FACTS OF THE CASE Southern Fairway Investments Pty. Ltd.‚ and Jakabar Pty Ltd (second defendant‚ and it being a wholly subsidiary company from the First Defendant) performed a Memorandum of Understanding or “MOU”. The MOU was executed in the way of a “deed” on the 12 of June 2008 where the parties would “use reasonable endeavours to negotiate by 30 august 2008 (and in any event no later than 30 October 2008) a Gas Supply Agreement” with the purpose to end of entering into a GSA (Gas Supply Agreement)
Premium Contract Law Corporation
Winch-It Industries Pty. Ltd. Board Report Sarah Ahmed Tutor: Suzanne Fawcus Date Due: May 6‚ 2011 Executive Summary As the board have agreed to go international‚ there are many International Human Resource Management aspects to be taken into consideration before Winch-it Pty. Ltd expands their business. There are several areas of interest to be analysed that requires specific attention to assist in commencing an international
Premium Human resource management Management Recruitment
The courts enforce a liquidated damages clause even if the final result of a case seem to be not fair for any of the parties. This is because of the set out they have agreed on in a contract. However‚ the courts will not enforce a bargain that leads to a penalty. The liability of proving that a clause is a penalty is dependent on the person trying to deny the liquidated damages application. Therefore‚ there are indicators and teste for a penalty in law. The test for penalty is known as the Dunlop
Premium
Case study6.2 Aroma Australia Pty Ltd goes to Japan Overview of case study Aroma Australia Pty Ltd is a successful company which performed very well in instant coffee industry. To prepare for a move into Japanese market‚ Ken Ishiguro who is the marketing manager of Aroma did amount of marketing researches on the instant coffee in Japan. Originally he came to the conclusion that it would be difficult for Aroma to enter Japanese market‚ due to the culture difference between Japanese and western
Premium Marketing Brand
For the case of Sopov v Kane Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009]‚ the appellant engaged the respondent as contractor in a construction project. The appellant repudiated the contract by wrongly calling on the respondent’s bank guarantee‚ in response to which the respondent terminated the contract and claimed damages for quantum meruit. The Court of Appeal applied the NSW Court of Appeal decision in Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 which provided that
Premium Law Appeal Jury
CASE NOTE Gammasonics Institute for Medical Research Pty Ltd v Comrad Medical Systems Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 267 New South Wales Supreme Court‚ heard by Fullerton J Gammasonic v Comrad[1] demonstrates the reluctance of the courts to interpret the Sale of Goods Act to include software downloads as a “good”‚ preferring to leave the matter up to statutory review. It primarily discusses whether a software package delivered by online download is effectively classed as “goods" for application of
Premium Contract
identified the different risk/loss exposure of the Zillion Builders Pavilion. Giving importance to the risk identification‚ this involves the risks or threats that were found and are likely to affect the firm. In addition‚ the analysis and evaluation of the identified risk/loss measures the frequency and the severity of the risk of Zillion Builders Pavilion. The analysis is determined by how the identified risk may affect the Zillion Builders Pavilion. IDENTIFICATION CHOOSING THEIR WALK-IN CUSTOMERS
Premium Risk Risk Risk management
Question 4 (Two Points) Prepare a first draft BPMN diagram that shows the Boat Sales Insurance Process. Be clear about how the customer interacts with the Insurance Company. Reading 5 In working up the BPMN flow diagram‚ you will notice that there are several occasions where the Registration Clerk has to update policies. As this occurs often‚ it’s important to get it right‚ so the BPM team decides to define this specific process in more detail. To do this‚ they interview the supervisor of
Premium Process management Change Insurance
Billabong Financial Review Review of Billabong Financial information for 2005-2008 Note: tables are shown in $’000s (excluding $ values expressed with decimal places) Note: revenue is expressed and revenue from the sale of goods. Question 1 – Revenue and Revenue Margin 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Revenue $ (From the sale of goods) $840‚701 $1‚018‚227 $1‚222‚911 $1‚347‚618 % Change from previous year 24.60% 21.12% 20.10% 10.20% % Change from base year (2004) 24.60% 50.91% 81.24% 99.73%
Premium Financial ratios Financial ratio Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Shell Cove Boat Harbour Development‚ NSW Greg Britton1 Director‚ Haskoning Australia (a company of Royal HaskoningDHV)‚ Sydney‚ Australia 1 Abstract Shell Cove is a large scale‚ masterplanned‚ beachside‚ urban development originally approved in the 1990s located on the New South Wales South Coast in the Shellharbour City region (Figure 1). The Boat Harbour element of the project is proposed to be developed in three stages and includes an Inner Harbour‚ Outer Harbour‚ Entrance Channel
Premium Management Sydney