murder of Mrs. Parkers who was battered to death in Northwood Street. Adams was accused of the murder when four witnesses saw him or someone with his appearance coming out of Mrs. Parker’s house holding a hammer on the day that she was murdered. The case is muddied by the fact that while Adams is standing in the dock there is another Adams‚ his identical twin sitting at the back of the court with his wife. The witnesses are all called to give their testimony and the final witness‚ Mrs. Salmon‚ who
Premium Murder Academy Award for Best Actress English-language films
(Node 4) = (600 000 X 1.0) = $600 000 EV (Node 2) = (400 000 X 0.1) + (825 000 X 0.4) + (600 000 X 0.5) = $670 000 EV (Node 1) = (400 000 X 0.1) + (825 000 X 0.4) + (600 000 X 0.5) = $670 000 2. I recommend that Allied should not accept the offer of $750 000 from John. It is because‚ based on the expected value at node 1‚ it show that $670 000 which is much cheaper than from the offer of $750 000 from John. So‚ the strategy to counteroffer of $400 000 is better than accepting
Premium Decision theory Expected value Random variable
A Case for the Defence -Graham Greene Revision Questions and Answers 1. What does his ‘wearing gloves’ suggest? When Mrs. Salmon saw Adams‚ he was at the steps of Mrs. Parker’s house and he was wearing gloves and had a hammer in his hands. Wearing gloves suggests that he had committed the crime and did not want to leave any evidence in the form of finger prints behind‚ that might put him into trouble. 2. What is the role of the ‘hammer’ in the trial? The hammer plays a vital role
Premium English-language films Witness Evidence
When looking for resources I came across a critical review to my story “The Lawsuit” by Naguib Mahfouz I came across a post which gave me a better insight of the story. My story was about a man who had trouble within on rather or not to help his step mother who he feels stole everything from him and his family. My article tried to evaluate his character and why the son wouldn’t try to get a better understand on why his step mother was asking him for money. The author of the article also tried to
Premium Family Naguib Mahfouz
Introduction to Business Law and Ethics Timothy Riley Grand Canyon University Module 2 May 5‚ 2013 Instructor: Pedro Moreno Chapter 5 Garelli Wong‚ Inc. v. William M. Nichols‚ Case 1:07-CV-06227 The court found in favor of Nichols. Due to the fact‚ that Garelli Wong’s complaint did not warrant any merit. All three counts were dismissed. The decision was based on‚ that due to its sole jurisdiction over the case‚ they dismissed the Garelli Wong’s claims based on “When a district court dismisses
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Jurisdiction Court
the act of causing Tony’s death‚ the actus reus of the cirme will be established. The mental element of the offence is also straightforward as Bill very obviously had the intention of killing Tony. Bill could try and rely on the defence of private defence. The defence would operate if the defendant (Bill) thought he was facing an unjust threat from the victim and to avoid such a threat used a reasonable level of force in circumstances. Section 3 of the Criminal Law Act 1967 states that ‘a person
Free Criminal law Law
1. Defence of India and every part thereof including preparation for defence and all such acts as may be conducive in times of war to its prosecution and after its termination to effective demobilisation. 2. Naval‚ military and air forces; any other armed forces of the Union. 2-A. Deployment of any armed forces of the Union or any other force subject to the control of the Union or any contingent or unit thereof in any State in aid of the civil power; powers‚ jurisdiction‚ privileges and liabilities
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Business Ethics Case BUS 415 February 26‚ 2012 Business Ethics Case: Lawsuits In every business ethics lawsuit there are many questions that must be answered. The first question that a person or organization wanting to sue must ask is if he or she has standing to sue. According to this law “the plaintiff must have some stake in the outcome of the lawsuit” (Cheeseman‚ 2010‚ p. 43). If the plaintiff does not have this they cannot bring the suit to court. The next question that must be determined
Premium Lawsuit Plaintiff Question
ASSESSMENT 2: Decision-making in a business scenario Introduction It is an analysis of case 3. Firstly Porter’ Generic Strategies will be used to confirm future strategy. Following this strategy and synergy effects‚ two criteria will be raised (including raising one framework which could be used to rate synergy effects). After rough screening‚ five force analysis will be made to test whether this cooperation would enhance any advantages. At last‚ two possible traps in process will be evaluated
Premium Strategic management Decision theory Porter five forces analysis
Exam Case Study Analysis „Google Hit with Job Discrimination Lawsuit“ 1. Beief description of the situation.Christina Elwell was the national sales director for Google in 2003. In April 2004 she informed her supervisor‚ Timothy Armstrong‚ that she bad become pregneat with quadruplets. By May she felt she was being discriminated against and filed a lawsuit with the US district court in New York. She felt this way due to the following instances:According to the lawsuit Armstrong was concerned about
Premium Employment United States Gender