1 LS 220 Constitutional Law ASSIGNMENT ONE ‘ADVISE THE MP ON THE LEGALITY‚ IN PARTICULAR‚ THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE MIGRATION BILL 2014.’ UNIT CO-ORDINATOR: DR OTTAVIO QUIRICO WORD COUNT: 1925 I INTRODUCTION The proposed Migration Bill (hereafter referred to as the Bill) raises a number of issues that must be analysed in order to ascertain the constitutionality of the proposals within the Act. The main considerations arise from sections 180‚ and 181 which state ‘that an officer must detain
Premium Law United Kingdom Human rights
African Consolidated Resources Plc and Others Minister of Mines and Mining Development and Others (HC 6411/07) [2010] ZWHHC 86 (6 September 2010) Download original filesPDF format RTF format | | Bookmark/share this page | [Context] [Hide Context] HH 205-2010 HC 6411/07 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE HELD AT HARARE In the matter between:- AFRICAN CONSOLIDATED RESOURCES Plc and DASHALOO INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD and POSSESSION INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD and HEAVY STUFF INVESTMENTS
Premium Appeal Court Judge
Facts: A Case of Cold Pizza Lee Chambers‚ the Defendant was driving 10 km over the speed limit while making pizza deliveries using the company van. To avoid hitting a dog‚ he had incidentally skidded sideways on a patch of ice and crashed into another vehicle. Alice White‚ the plaintiff who was not wearing a seatbelt at the time had suffered numerous injuries. The Plaintiff had sued Lee Chambers and Vinnie’s Pizza Ltd. for general and special damages along with cost of car repairs‚ and loss of
Premium Tort Tort law
wCASE LAW * STILK v MYRICK (Law Of Contract: Rules of Consideration-m/s 18) Facts: the captain of a ship promises his crew that if they shared between them the work of two seamen who had deserted‚ the wages of the deserters would be shared out between them. Held: the promise was not binding because the seamen gave no consideration. They were already contractually bound to do any extra work to complete the voyage. * HEARTLEY v PONSONBY (Law Of Contract: Rules of Consideration-m/s 18) Facts:
Premium Contract Contract law
21:19 http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl... IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL POIARES MADURO delivered on 30 September 2009 1(1) Case C 135/08 Janko Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany)) (European citizenship – Loss – Lapse of the nationality of the Member State of origin upon acquisition of the nationality
Premium European Union Law Citizenship of the European Union
Law Case Analysis Material Facts and Source of Law The plaintiff William Shelensky was a director who owned a minority stockholder of Defendant Corporation called Chicago National League Ball Club‚ which operated Chicago Cubs. The Cubs had been suffering operating losses from direct baseball operations from 1961-1965. The director defendant Philip K. Wrigley who owned 80% stock shares did not install lights at Wrigley Field so that the Cubs could not play at night when at home‚ even though the
Premium Law Decision making Chicago Cubs
a memorandum addressing the following matters in detail‚ and including relevant case law to support your arguments: What are Buyer ’s potential claims against Seller? What are Seller ’s potential defences? Who is likely to prevail in the event this case goes to court? Assume Buyer prevails in his lawsuit against Seller. What damages is Buyer likely to receive from the court? SUMMARY AND RELEVANT FACTS In this case Buyer is plaintiff whereas Seller is defendant. October 1: Buyer saw courier
Premium Contract Breach of contract Law
Case – British Railways board Vs Herrington Relevance - Trespasser duty of care - Common humanity - Occupiers liability act 1984 Facts - Railway line operated by BRB ran through property open to public - Fences were in poor repair - 1965 children seen on line - Child severely injured when he stepped on line after passing through broken fence - Plaintiff claimed damages for negligence Ruling - House of lords held over trespassers‚ a duty to take steps as common humanity to avert
Premium Tort law Tort Law
Tort law is defined as a body of rights which are applied by courts in civil proceedings to provide relief for persons who have suffered harm from the wrongful acts of others. Since businesses have high amounts of money which can provide them with multiple lawyers‚ it makes it almost impossible for an average customer to not only defeat but even have a fair fight in court. Tort law protects the customer’s best interest and provides them the highest level of justice in these types of cases. Although
Premium Law Negligence Tort
Legal Issues in Management Final Case Study Christine Stout Southern Oregon University Business law – case study The case study of John and Stacey has so many complicated elements that apparently all the stakeholders involved apart from the two mentioned could sue or be sued against. This paper assumes that this is the scenario for this paper. The characters involved are John and Stacy‚ a restaurant owner‚ the owner of a townhouse‚ the owner of the mink on which John tripped and subsequently
Premium Contract Law