Lawsuit LAWS310 December 14‚ 2011 Factual Summary: Provide a succinct and accurate description of the scenario at hand. Summarize the scenario to include all relevant facts. A neighborhood group called NICE is utilizing the principles of common law-private and public nuisance and trespass- to bring attention to the problem of air‚ ground‚ and water pollution which is occurring on adjoining land to the Northfield Dairy Farm. This farmland is very expansive and requires much manure to ensure the
Premium Tort Law Property
Part A Question 1: In this case‚ there were two parties. Mrs MARTIN FRANCIS BYRNES is the appellant who filled the case. Mr JOAN WILHELMINA BYRNES is another appellant and son of Mrs MARTIN FRANCIS BYRNES. Mr JOAN WILHELMINA BYRNES is also solicitor on behalf of his mother and regularly gave legal advice to his mother regarding to property and affairs. Mr CLIFFORD FRANK KENDLE is the responded. Mrs Byrnes and MrKendle married in 1980 when Mrs Byrnes was 60 years old and MrKendle was 57. It was
Premium Law Appeal United States
Dawn Slavinski 1/3/05 Constitutional Law Supreme Court Case Write-Up Case: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1976) Source: Internet http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=438&invol=265 http://texascivilrightsreview.org/phpnuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=129 http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/324/ Issue: Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
COMMERCIAL TENANCY LAW IN AUSTRALIA AJ BRADBROOK CE CROFT BUTTERWORTHS (1990) [1.04] the doubt which has been created results from a series of English decisions given in the course of the 1950s and 1960s. In 1952 Denning LJ (as he then was)‚ expressed the view that the test of exclusive possession was by no means decisive: Errington v Errington [1952] 1 All ER 149 at 297; [1952] 1 KB 290. His Lordship said that the difference between a tenancy and
Premium Law Common law Property
case study of company law I. Sarah’s business act and Richforth Ltd. constitution A company is a legal entity that is separate and distinct from its members and shareholders. When a company is legally formed‚ it has become ‘incorporated’ (Wild and Weinstein‚ 2009). As a legal person‚ a company must act in compliance with existing laws and in accordance with the terms of its constitution. Section 33 (1) of the CA 2006 provides: “The provisions of a company’s constitution bind the company
Premium Law United States Constitution Constitution
FINANCIAL AID FOR LAW SCHOOL: A PRELIMINARY GUIDE LSAC.org INTRODUCTION Legal education is an investment in your future and is a serious financial investment as well. As with any investment‚ it is important to consider the pros and cons of entering into such a large expenditure of effort‚ time‚ and money. Particularly in uncertain financial times‚ a realistic assessment of why you are seeking a legal education and how you will pay for it is critical. The single best source of
Premium University Education Law
Case Report Worksheet Case name including citation? Fisher V Bell [1961] 1 QB 394‚ [1960] 3 WLR 919‚ [1960] 3 All ER 731‚ HKSAR V Chow Kwong Chun (unrep.‚ HCMA No 836 of 2001) and HKSAR V Wan Hon Sik [2001] 3 HKLRD 283 were cited in the judgeme Is it a civil case or criminal case? It is a criminal case as Yu Wai Chuen was charged by HKSAR. Who are the parties? The plaintiff (prosecutor) was HKSAR and defendant was Yu Wai Chuen. This was an appeal by Yu Wai Chuen against HKSAR (respondent).
Premium Ratio decidendi Stare decisis Appeal
Why we have laws- The law is a legal set of rules that the government and courts have made for everyone to follow. Without laws‚ confusion and chaos would occur. In extreme cases of conflict‚ a state of anarchy would develop. The person with the most strength will start to dominate and the weak and helpless would suffer. However‚ when laws are enforced‚ a sense of order is created resulting in a society where everyone can live peacefully. Why laws change-? Societies’ perceptions have changed over
Premium Law Legislature Statute
Employment Law Compliance Plan: Landslides Limousines University of Phoenix HRM 521 October 14‚ 2013 Debbie Long Employment Law Compliance Plan Memorandum TO: Bradley Stonefield FROM: Esther Jording DATE: October 14‚ 2013 SUBJECT: Employment Law Compliance for Landslides Limousines Dear Bradley‚ The following memo is an Employment Law Compliance Plan for Landslides Limousines. The plan summarizes key federal and Texas State employment laws. This report also includes recommendations
Premium Road Management Employment
Drake and Keeler employer could argue the employment-at-will law was the reason for their discharge. According to Lisa Guerin‚ if Drake and Keeler are employed as at-will employees‚ then his or her employer does not need to have a good cause to fire him or her. In fact‚ if Drake and Keeler employer did not make it clear as to what kind of employee he or she was‚ then according to the law he or she is presumed to be hired as at-will. The only way Drake and Keeler can avoid being an at-will employee
Premium Employment National Labor Relations Act Tort law