me in doing a lot of Research and I came to know about so many new things. I am really thankful to her. Secondly I would also like to thank my parents and friends who helped me a lot in finishing this project within the limited time. TABLE OF CASES Reid v Rigby‚ (1894) 2 QB 40.......................................................................................................... Weigall S & Co v Runciman & Co. (1916) 85LJKB 187 (CA)...............................................
Premium Contract
Essential Elements of Contract Contract represents the instrument to enforce promises. Not all statements amount to enforceable promises or contracts. To enforce statements there are a number of elements which courts look for and these mainly include the presence of offer‚ its communication‚ its unconditional acceptance and communication of the acceptance. Once this has taken place then the element of consideration gives the badge of enforceability to the contract and the contract is then enforceable
Premium Contract
Contract Law Introduction In the following case note I will examine the High Court case; Smart Telecom Plc. V Radio Teilefis Eireann & Glanbia Plc. [2006] IEHC 176. The essence of this case is one involving a request for tenders put forward by RTE for sponsorship and the subsequent refusal of Smart Telecom’s referential bid thereto. The questions raised were (1) whether referential bidding was a permissible term of RTE’s offer and (2) if not‚ were they were obliged to re-tender the contract
Premium Contract
Introduction A contract is formed when one of the parties has to accept an offer made by the other. Here‚ David places an advertisement in the local newspaper of a reward‚ £1000 for the safe return of each of his six cats. This shows he is making an offer to all the readers of the Daily Bungle. An offer is defined as follows: “An offer is a statement of the terms upon which the offeror is prepared to be bound if acceptance is communicated while the offer remains alive1.” The critical aspect of
Premium Contract Contract law
of void contract under Nepalese Contract Act by illustrating the cases. Any contract which is not enforceable by law is said to be void. A void contract is one which has no legal effect whatsoever owing to the fact that a transaction which is void. Even if they satisfy some of the conditions of a valid contract‚ they are not enforceable. In the eye of law such contract is no contract at all. There are some contracts which have been declared as void by section 13 of Nepalese Contract Act 2056. Section
Premium Contract Law Contract law
Law assignment Name: Chang Jun Han Student ID Number: Identification card number : Group : Lecturer’s name: The issue in this case deals with invatition to treat ‚ offer ‚ counter-offer ‚ conditional acceptance and acceptance . It also deals with the elements of valid contract. General rule for a binding contract is an offer and an acceptance of the proposal. There must be effective communication to the proposer. It is very important to differeciate a proposal from an invitation to
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance
INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE OF QUASI CONTRACTS:- Under the general heading of the Quasi contract there has been grouped a number of cases which have little or no affinity with contract. A simple illustration is afforded by the action to recover money paid by mistake. If the plaintiff on an erroneous interpretation of the facts‚ pays to the defendant a sum of money which he does not really owe‚ law‚ no less than justice‚ will require he defendant to restore it. But his obligation is manifestly not
Premium Contract Common law Quasi-contract
2(a) of the Contract Acts 1950 provides that: “when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything‚ with a view to obtain the assent of that other to the act or abstinence‚ he is said to make a proposal”. Eg: Ali advertised in Malay Mails that he will give a reward of RM100 to anyone who finds his pet. He signified his willingness to do an act‚ which is to pay a reward‚ upon certain terms‚ with a view of obtaining the other’s assent to the act and ready to
Premium Contract Contract law Hajj
elements required for formation of valid contract The contract law is a situation where law is related to business transactions. In the situations good are purchased‚ sold‚ as well as moved through the contract. The employees are hired‚ land are developed‚ sold‚ bought leased or financed under the contract. Most of the businesses are based under contracts. Generally‚ the contracts represent foundation of the most of the commercial activities and therefore contract law stands for one of the crucial areas
Premium Contract
Voidable contract is a contract that has legal effect and force when it is made‚ but is liable to be subsequently annulled or set aside by the courts through the process of recission. Due to the section 10 of the Contracts Act provides‚ all agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of the parties competent to contract. As what i’ve been thought and my understanding‚ there are five causes which lead to the voidable contract. They are : 1. Coercion (S.15) 2. Undue influence (S.16)
Premium Contract Contract law