"Carlill v carbolic smoke ball co" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 5 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asfar and Co v Blundell (1896) 1 QB 123 Court of Appeal (Lord Esher MR‚ Lopes and Kay LJJ) Dates no longer merchantable as dates Facts A vessel‚ on board which dates had been shipped‚ was sunk during the course of the voyage‚ and subsequently raised. On arrival at the port of discharge it was found that‚ although the dates still retained the appearance of dates‚ and although they were of some value for the purpose of distillation into spirit‚ they were so impregnated with sewage and in such a

    Premium Shipping Cargo Transport

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bàitập 1 – Chương 1 HãyđọccácđoạntríchtrongbảnánvàxácđịnhcácnguồnluậtvàTòaánđãsửdụng Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Broderip v Salomon) Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 is a landmark1 UK company law case. The effect of the Lords ’ unanimous 2 ruling was to uphold 3firmly the doctrine4 of corporate personality‚ as set out in the Companies Act 1862‚ so that creditors of an insolvent company could not sue the company ’s shareholders

    Premium Corporation

    • 1326 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoke Detector

    • 3378 Words
    • 14 Pages

    1 Smoke Detector ∗ Sardar Nimisha Sankhe∗ ‚ Nisarg Vinod† and Ekta Vira Patel Institute of Technology‚ Mumbai-400058‚ India‚ nimisha.sankhe@yahoo.com † Sardar Patel Institute of Technology‚ Mumbai-400058‚ India‚ naughty.nisarg@yahoo.co.in ‡ Sardar Patel Institute of Technology‚ Mumbai-400058‚ India‚ ekta vira@ymail.com Abstract Most of the smoke alarms available in the market use one or another kind of smoke sensor which increases the cost and also require complicated interfacing circuitry

    Premium Integrated circuit Smoke Alarm

    • 3378 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Smoke Survey

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Do you smoke? -Yes‚ it doesn’t cost me very much because I smoke a packet in one month. Do you know the dangers of tobacco? -Yes‚ the risks are having lung cancer‚ oral cancer‚ chronic cough‚ etc. Have you ever tried to quit? -No‚ because I know I’m not addict When/why do you smoke? -Social occasions because I love how it tastes with alcohol. Have you ever had health problems as a result of smoking? -No Does your addiction affect other people? -Not really because I don’t have

    Premium Tobacco smoking Nicotine Addiction

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leonard V. Pepsico

    • 2311 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Leonard v. PepsiCo an Offer Too Good To Be True American InterContinental University Abstract In this week’s Individual Project we are asked to consider specific questions in regards to the case of a Seattle man who took on a soft drink giant in regards to a Harrier Jet. The following pages will discuss first the four elements of a valid contract and then move into a discussion of the objective theory of contracts. The objective theory of contracts will then be applied specifically to the

    Premium Contract

    • 2311 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoke Camels

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Doctors Choose to Smoke Camel Brand Cigarettes Devry University Doctors Choose to Smoke Camel Brand Cigarettes Camel is a brand of cigarettes developed by R.J. Reynolds‚ an American company‚ in 1913. The company has had many advertising slogans since its development. The first noted was “I’d Walk a Mile for a Camel”. In the 1940’s‚ the pitch was that Camels were “Slow Burning” and this helped reduce nicotine levels. With the U.S. entering WWII‚ the ads started to include soldiers and suggested

    Premium Nicotine Cigarette Tobacco

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Keighley‚ Maxted & Co v Durant (1901)‚ A was authorized by P to buy wheat at 44s 3d a quarter on a joint account for A and P. Wheat was unobtainable at this price and‚ therefore‚ A agreed to buy from T at 44s 6d a quarter. Though he intended to buy it on behalf of himself and P‚ A contracted in his own name and did not disclose the agency to T. The next day P ratified the purchase at the unauthorized price but‚ in due course‚ P and A failed to take delivery. It was held by the House of Lords

    Premium Appeal Contract

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Not to Smoke

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ruin your life. It has to be one of the least healthiest things you can do. Smoking causes many different types of cancer and disease‚ such as lung cancer and heart disease‚ both can be fatal. To inspire cigarette smoke‚ even if inhaled by second-hand smoke (inhaling cigarette smoke from another person’s cigarette) can deteriorate your lungs. Smoking also causes loss of brain cells‚ which can be cause to serious injury later. Smoking also makes you look repulsive‚ almost unbearable to look at

    Premium Tobacco smoking Cigarette Poison

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smoke Signal

    • 1898 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Smoke Signal The “Rechartering of the Feminine Space” inspects the results of a father’s lack on an individual’s development. Abandonment at a young age hints to internal refusal and conceded worth‚ concluding in a rotation of “a lack of self assertion”. Subsequently Victor’s scar has been wreaked‚ causing him to not be able to acknowledge or deal with agony triggered by his father. Internalizing all his emotions‚ he relives his pain daily‚ gaining strength in anger and lashing

    Premium

    • 1898 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Leamon Johnson & Wales University Law 2001 Professor Bertron 01 Feb 2014 Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Martinez Briefly explain the opinion. Which of Martinez’s claims were successful and which were not? Why (what was the court’s legal explanation)? In this case‚ Martinez brought forward three claims. First‚ he claimed strict product liability based on defective design of the tire. Martinez also claimed negligence and gross negligence. In their ruling‚ the jury found that the defective design

    Premium Jury Tort Law

    • 758 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50