Hyde v Wrench(1840) Hyde v Wrench [1840] EWHC Ch J90 is a leading English contract law case on the issue of counter-offers and their relation to initial offers. In it Lord Langdale ruled that any counter-offer cancels the original offer. Wrench offered to sell his farm in Luddenham to Hyde for £1000‚ an offer which Hyde declined. On 6 June 1840 Wrench wrote to Hyde’s agent offering to sell the farm for £1000‚ stating that it was the final offer and that he would not alter from it.[1] Hyde offered
Premium Contract Common law Invitation to treat
PART A – Four Step Process (20 marks) Question (a) 10 marks The legal issue in question was the elements of agreement that are required for the formation of a legal contract. The elements of an agreement that are required for the formation of a legal contract is that it should consist of both offer and acceptance. This being said‚ there are principles that constitute an offer and acceptance. An offer consists of the element of promissory. This means that there must be an undertaking or promise
Premium Contract Contract law
Introduction A contract is defined as an agreement enforceable by law. Hence for all contracts there should have an agreement. The agreement arises by one of the parties making an offer and its acceptance by the other party. Both offer and acceptance create an agreement. In simple contract should first contain an offer made by one party to the other. What is an offer? As per Sec 2(a) of the contract act “When one person signifies to another his
Premium Contract
Mrs. C used the smoke ball and caught Influenza‚ then claimed the $100 from the company. a- How were the facts of Carlil v. Carbolic Smoke Ball different from the usual situation involving an advertisement? ( relate it to the elements of a contract ) The statement has all the elements of a formal contract: two (or more) parties‚ an “offer‚” in this case a reward by Carbolic Smoke Ball Company‚ and “acceptance‚” in this case by Mrs. Louisa Elizabeth Carlill’s dutiful use of the product three
Premium Contract
The Games Café: Legal Advisory The Games café is an internet café with an innovative edge‚ diversifying into the market for computer games and consoles unlike any other known competitors. The business is currently experiencing legal issues and is in need of updating its policies and practices; the café has recently joined the small business federation and have been assigned with legal advisory for best practices on contractual and consumer matters. The Games Cafe needs to improve on how it
Premium Contract
the offer‚ and it was regarding to offer and acceptance. It had similar with the cases of Powell v Lee (1908). Offer is define as proposal under Section 2(a) of the Contract Acts 1950 and the principle of an offer can be found in the cases of Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. Beside that‚ offer and acceptance means of analyzing the process of negotiation to decide whether and when a contract has been made and what therefore constitutes its item. In the cases Dahari make offer to James in order
Premium Contract
In this essay‚ I am going to analyse the rules of offer and acceptance and then come to a conclusion as to how satisfactory I think each of them are and why. In its general sense‚ an offer is an indication or proposal by one person or party (offeror) to another (offeree). It consists of one party promising to do or give something for the other party’s promise to do or give something in return. There must be willingness to contract on certain terms‚ made with the intention that it shall become
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance Invitation to treat
Meeting of minds: Clarke v Earl of Dunraven and Mount Earl: Yacht races. Letters sent in Communication (in writing‚ speech and conduct): Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co: pay back 100 if you get influenza. Deposit 1000 The Acceptance: Strictly in response to offer: R v Clarke: arrested‚
Premium Contract
Carlill v. The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. The case of Carlill v. The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company‚ centred around an advertisement which was placed in the Pall Mall Gazette on November 13‚ 1891. The advertisement was entered by The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company and was promoting a “medical preparation”1 which the company had developed‚ called the Carbolic Smoke Ball. The advertisement clamed that “During the last epidemic of influenza many thousand carbolic smoke balls were sold as preventatives
Premium Contract Invitation to treat Offer and acceptance
Explain the facts‚ issues and reason in the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. FACTS The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company made a product called the "smoke ball". It claimed to be a cure for influenza and a number of other diseases‚ in the context of the 1889-1890 flu pandemic (estimated to have killed 1 million people). The smoke ball was a rubber ball with a tube attached. It was filled with carbolic acid (or phenol). The tube would be inserted into a user’s nose and squeezed at the bottom
Premium Invitation to treat Contract Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company