Spenser Garrison Strategic Management 3/17/10 Case 1: Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2006 The soft drink industry is very competitive for all companies involved. Recently the competition between established firms has only increased with the market nearing its saturation point. All companies in the industry‚ especially those thinking about entering‚ have to think about Porter’s 5-Forces model and the pressures it outlines; rivalry among establish firms‚ risk of entry by potential
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink
Case Study: Coke & Pepsi learn to compete in India Timing of entry into the Indian market brought different results for PepsiCo and Coca-Cola India. What benefits or disadvantages accrued as a result of earlier or later market entry? Coca-Cola (1990) Benefits: advantages as „Early-Follower“‚ possibility to use reliable market information that´s already existing take-over of standards position as international market leader Disadvantages: expert knowledge of competitors has to be overtaken
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Marketing
Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India CASE STUDY 2 International Marketing 1. The political environment in India has proven to be critical to company performance for both PepsiCo and Coca- Cola India. What specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? Could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? If not‚ could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? There are several specific aspects of the political environment
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 A case discussion note January 17‚ 2012 1. Historically‚ why has the soft drink industry been so profitable? Historically‚ the soft carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been valued at $74 billion in the United States. In order to understand the reasons why the industry has been hugely profitable despite the ‘Cola Wars’‚ an examination of the CSD industry with Porter’s five forces analysis will be conducted. As market leaders‚ the analysis will
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola
soft drinks in the industry‚ and most like will remain the leaders in the upcoming years. Financial Analysis The purpose of this paper is to provide a financial analysis comparison between PepsiCo and the Coca-Cola Cooperation. Many companies are forever finding ways to improve market value to increase sales‚ and income. Consumers will always look for deals or special buys to not only save them money but also‚ give them better quality. Companies are always looking for ways to make profits when
Premium Balance sheet Coca-Cola
09 Pepsi & Coke 08 Fall In May‚ 1886‚ Coca Cola was introduced by John Pemberton a pharmacist from Atlanta‚ Georgia. John Pemberton started brewing his coca cola formula in a three legged brass kettle in his backyard. Pharmacists Caleb Bradham in New Bern‚ North Carolina first made competitor Pepsi in the 1890’s. The brand was trademarked on June 16‚ 1903. These companies have brand identification and customer loyalties that have made them a historical landmark. Today Pepsi and Coke control
Premium Coca-Cola Marketing Soft drink
wondered if the sugar content in Coke and Pepsi has altered you or your friends preference? In this experiment‚ we tested to see if the sugar content changes peoples preference over Coke and Pepsi. We chose this experiment because we would like to see how people change their opinions of their favorite soda‚ after we have informed them of the sugar content. This experiment of Coke vs Pepsi is tied into chemistry by the percentage of the compound/sugar in each can of soda. Background Information On
Premium Coca-Cola Diet Coke Thums Up
The monthly giving programs have become very popular among non-profits because of their potential for long term financial commitments. This recurring giving is a monthly donation that happens automatically using a process that’s referred to as E.M.T (Electronic Money Transfer.) This valuable program provides a predictable source of income that a non-profit can depend on every month without question. Recruiting monthly donors is inexpensive and affordable. Once set up‚ the donation process is electronic
Premium Non-profit organization Giving Gift
debating whether Pepsi is better than Coke or if Coke is better than Pepsi. A few articles say Coke wins the battle between Pepsi and Coke. The other articles state Pepsi wins the controversy. Some articles state that nobody wins the Coke vs. Pepsi battle. Pepsi apparently has a softer fizz than Coke. Pepsi’s characterized is a citrusy flavor burst‚ while Coke has more of a raisiny vanilla flavor. Pepsi’s flavor is more sharper than Coke’s flavor. Coke has 160 calories while Pepsi has 10 less
Premium
company from the case. 5. How can Pepsi and Coke confront the issues of water use in the manufacture of their products? How can they diffuse further boycotts or demonstrations against the products? How effective are activist groups like the one that launched the campaign in California? Should Coke address the group directly or just let the furor subside? 6. Which of the two companies do you think has better long-term prospects for success in India? 7. What lessons can each company draw from its Indian
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Carbonation