of Business and Public Management Department of Management and Leadership March 3‚ 2014 TESCA CASE STUDY SUMMARY RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed refrigerator manufacturing and sales project for Tesca Works‚ Inc. is a financially complicated project which on the surface‚ given the increase in energy costs and customer demand may seem like a winning proposition. However‚ when we delve further into the details of the financial projections along with projections of
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow
Net present value In finance‚ the net present value (NPV) or net present worth (NPW) of a time series of cash flows‚ both incoming and outgoing‚ is defined as the sum of the present values (PVs) of the individual cash flows. In case when all future cash flows are incoming (such as coupons and principal of a bond) and the only outflow of cash is the purchase price‚ the NPV is simply the PV of future cash flows minus the purchase price (which is its own PV). NPV is a central tool in discounted cash
Premium Net present value
m. sole proprietorship n. partnership o. corporation p. limited liability partnership 5.) Maddux‚ Inc.‚ has completed its fiscal year and reported the following information. The company had current assets of $153‚413‚ net fixed assets of $ 412‚331‚ and other assets of $83‚552. The firm also has current liabilities worth $65‚314‚ long-term debt of $178‚334‚ and common
Premium Net present value Time value of money Rate of return
benefits $60‚ useful life 7 years b) Alternative B: initial cost $60‚ annual benefits $20‚ useful life 7 years Which alternative is preferable if i = 12%? a) PV = $173.84 b) PV = $31.28 Select option a 7. Project A and B have
Premium Money Compound interest Interest
* There are various reasons for the use of open approach. Since the outcomes of these projects are highly unforeseen‚ according one interviewee‚ the application of quantitative tools is not plausible. Therefore‚ companies tend to apply the rule of thumb methods rather than standardized quantitative models. The justification for not applying quantitative models is some times attributed to the nature of a project. Capital inv appraisal of new technologies: Problems‚ misconceptions and research directions
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Discounted cash flow
Assignment “Net Promoter Score: a strong indicator of loyalty and growth?” 2 Table of Content Page Introduction…………………………………………………………………………3 1 Main advantages of the NPS……………………………………………...4 1.1 1.2 1.3 2 Simple and understandable – the calculation of the NPS……...4 Simple categorization of the customer groups - …………………. application of the NPS……………………………………………...5 Motivating Change - customer-focused management by NPS...6 Main disadvantages of the NPS ................................
Premium
limited liability‚ ease of transferability‚ ability to raise capital‚ and unlimited life. 2. Evaluate the following statement: Managers should not focus on the current stock value because doing so will lead to an overemphasis on short-term profits at the expense of long- term profits. Presumably‚ the current stock value reflects the risk‚ timing‚ and magnitude of all future cash flows‚ both short-term and long-term. If this is correct‚ then the statement is false. 3. Could a company’s cash
Premium Net present value Cash flow Asset
TecOne investors want a 40 percent rate of return on their investment‚ calculate the venture’s present value. B. Now assume that the Year 6 cash flows are forecasted to be $900‚000 in the stepping stone year and are expected to grow at an 8 percent compound annual rate thereafter. Assuming that the investors still want a 40 percent rate of return on their investment‚ calculate the venture’s present value. C. Now extend Part B one step further. Assume that the required rate of return
Premium Net present value Rate of return Cash flow
Caledonia Project Caledonia Project FIN/370 Julie Vogt January 9‚ 2012 Week 4 Team project was to answer question 12 a-e on page 363‚ Chapter 10 of Financial Management: Principles and Applications. 12. Caledonia is considering two additional mutually exclusive projects. The cash flows associated with these projects are as follows: YEAR | PROJECT A | PROJECT B | 0 | -$100‚000 | -$100‚000 | 1 | 32‚000 | 0 | 2 | 32‚000 | 0 | 3 | 32‚000 | 0 | 4 | 32‚000 | 0 | 5 | 32
Premium Net present value Cash flow
Net Present Value/Present Value Index The management team at Savage Corporation is evaluating two alternative capital investment opportunities. The first alternative‚ modernizing the company’s current machinery‚ costs $45‚000. Management estimates the modernization project will reduce annual net cash outflows by $12‚500 per year for the next five years. The second alternative‚ purchasing a new machine‚ costs $56‚500. The new machine is expected to have a five-year useful life and a $4‚000
Premium Net present value Variable cost Cash flow