Project Management Course IV School of Management Engineering Dept. of Production Systems and Business Economics Project Management Project Financing Instructor: Alberto De Marco Project Management Phase FEASIBILITY DESIGN PLANNING DEVELOPMENT CLOSEOUT OPERATIONS Financing&Evaluation Risk Analysis&Attitude Alberto De Marco 1 Financing Project Management Course Project Financing Context Evaluating and financing as precursor to decision d i i to proceed (feasibility
Premium Net present value Debt Cash flow
of Business and Public Management Department of Management and Leadership March 3‚ 2014 TESCA CASE STUDY SUMMARY RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed refrigerator manufacturing and sales project for Tesca Works‚ Inc. is a financially complicated project which on the surface‚ given the increase in energy costs and customer demand may seem like a winning proposition. However‚ when we delve further into the details of the financial projections along with projections of
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Cash flow
does project management apply to Adventures Unlimited? Each tour established by Adventures Unlimited could be considered as a single project. Each tour has the destination‚ and is not routine and repetitive. The project begins when the consumer and Adventures Unlimited reach the same agreement‚ and ends when the consumer goes back. Each tour is unique and never been taken before. That is to say‚ each tour has the specific time‚ cost‚ and performance requirements. The tour‚ as one project‚ can
Premium Management Project management Net present value
Financing the Mozal Project Table of Content 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Project Valuation ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 2.2 3 Should Alusaf/Gencor invest in the Mozal Project? ............................................................... 4 What are the greatest risks
Premium Investment Risk Finance
Project Proposal - Ford Motor Company Annette F. McGee FIN 575 March 11‚ 2013 Gabriel Renero Project Proposal - Ford Motor Company PROGRAM OR PROJECT BUDGET PROGRAM/PROJECT: INCREASING WORKER SAFETY Fiscal Year: __2012______ EXPENSE $25 mil CASH FLOWS Year 2: $5 mil Year 3: $10 mil Year 4: $15 mil Year 5: $12 mil Business Overview Ford Motor Company is known for its vehicles and
Premium Net present value Ford Motor Company Finance
Faculty of Business and Law SIM335 Managing Projects Level: 3Module: SIM335 Managing Projects Assignment code: SIM335Contribution to the module assessment: 100% This is an individual assignment-please complete both tasks 1 and 2 Both tasks relate to the units in the module guide and the attached case study. It is advised that you read the case study thoroughly before attempting the tasks. Task 1 (40% marks) 600 words (+/- 10%) each short answer question requires a response in a few sentences
Premium Project management
2: VALUING CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROJECTS CORPORATE FINANCE GROUP Y Growth Enterprises‚ Inc When valuing any project‚ the free cash flows must be determined in order to be able to successfully implement any method of capital budgeting. Growth Enterprises is currently considering four projects. Each has an equal required initial investment of $10‚000‚000 which is followed by a set of cash flows different for each project. Depreciation figures for each project were calculated on a straight-line
Premium Net present value
Project Feasibility Analysis Principle of Planning and the Project Approach Planning What is Planning? * Future Making * Shortcut to the future Why Planning * Scarcity of resources * Unlimited Wants of people * Welfare Maximization in the long run How or Technique of Planning 1. Short term Planning Technique “Empirical Approach” Data>Problems>Needs 2. Long term Planning Technique a. “Model and Programming Approach Planning Process 1. Plan Formulation
Premium Project management Net present value Cost-benefit analysis
WACC is 12.0%. All of Division A’s projects are equally risky‚ as are all of Division B’s projects. However‚ the projects of Division A are less risky than those of Division B. Which of the following projects should the firm accept? (Points : 10) A Division B project with a 13% return. A Division B project with a 12% return. A Division A project with an 11% return. A Division A project with a 9% return. A Division B project with an 11% return. 6. (TCO D) Assume
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return Corporate finance
Ans: 1(a) Unemployment Rate = Unemployed Employed + Unemployed In January 2012‚ 141‚608 thousand were employed and 12‚748 thousand were unemployed. Unemployment rate = 12‚748 ÷ (141‚608 + 12‚748) = 8.26% In January 2013‚ 143‚322 thousand were employed and 12‚332 thousand were unemployed. Unemployment rate = 12‚322 ÷ (143‚322+12‚332) = 7.92% 1(b) Employment-Population ratio = In January 2012‚ 141‚608 thousand were employed and total population was 244‚663 tnousand. Employment-Population ratio
Premium Inflation Unemployment