Analogical Argument 2. Analogue: doctors and lawyers Primary Subject: travel agents Similarity: jobs that give public service with years of training Property: must also give the most safety and comfort in service Although there are many relevant similarities between the analogue and the primary subject (e.g. jobs that give public service with years of training)‚ they are outweighed by the relevant dissimilarities‚ most important of which is the difference in the level of training and
Premium Law Lawyer Common law
1. Who is considered the author of the Ontological argument? ANS: Saint Anslem 2. The first 3 “Ways” by St. Thomas Aquinas (to prove the existence of God) are called: a. argument from design b. argument from perfection c. cosmological argument d. none of the above. ANS: Cosmological argument 3. Explain the thrid way by Aquinas...which is called the argument from contigency. (2 or 3 sentences) ANS: Contingency can be explained as the possibility of things that come into being and go out of being
Premium Metaphysics Existence Ontology
Two thumbs up for Hard Incompatabilism Through Perebooms arguments we see how he argues against compatibilism‚ and how he presents to us four cases that will support his rejection against compatibilism. We will see how he delivers a way in which the agents will not be morally responsible for their actions‚ and succeeds in planting that seed of dought in us. Summary: In Pereboom’s argument‚ he discusses that it is because casual determinism is true that we lack this sort of free will that is required
Premium Free will Determinism Libertarianism
Strawson’s attempts to break down the Basic Argument into conversational language which‚ while helpful‚ does not lead me to agree with his idea. His adjusted argument goes a bit like this: one does what one does because one is oneself. The only way to adjust oneself is to act‚ but since one acts according to oneself‚ one would have to make infinitely expounding choices about who one is and how to be and how to change. This would lead one to suppose that it’s impossible to create oneself and as such
Premium Morality Philosophy Ethics
Visual Argument: Purpose and audience: In today’s society‚ images play a large role in defining who we are‚ in communicating ideas‚ and in shaping what we think. For instance‚ controversy surrounded the President using images of the World Trade Center tragedy for purported political gain. The advertisement for drinking more milk (“Got Milk?”) is a popular image‚ while MTV moved young people toward small visual sound bites. Think about what type of images “speak” to you. Think about what certain
Premium Computer graphics
characteristic the degrading and demeaning portrayal of the role and status of the human female...as a mere sexual object to be exploited and manipulated sexually (p.43)." Helen Longino ’s definition can be used as the basis of numerous arguments dealing with pornography. In this paper‚ I will deal with only one controversial aspect of pornography. That aspect is the censorship of pornography. Although Wicclair raises several reasons for being wary of the censorship of pornography‚
Premium Censorship First Amendment to the United States Constitution Definition
Factors For and Against Marijuana should be legalized in the United States. Reasons for legalization (ranked from strongest to weakest) 1. Medical benefits for terminal illnesses such as cancer. 2. Police and court resources would be freed to pursue more serious crimes. 3. The FDA could regulate the quality and safety of the drug. 4. This drug has fewer side effects that most currently legal narcotics. 5. Legalization would lower prices‚ thereby reducing crimes such as theft. 6
Premium Drug addiction Law Ethics
Prosecuting Argument Paper In presenting its case against‚ Mr. Stu Dent involving the deceased victim‚ Uma Opee‚ the prosecution intends to show the elements of crime are present in each of the charges lodged against the defendant‚ Stu Dents. Members of the team will provide a specific law for each charge which may be found in one of the following states; Indiana‚ Minnesota‚ and Texas. However‚ the prosecution team has decided that it will pursue this particular case in the great State of Texas
Premium Criminal law
The Bible has been proven to be true by historical evidence It’s so important to know why to believe the Bible. Christians base so many arguments and their whole belief system off of what the Bible says. When a Christian is asked why they believe what the Bible says though they are speechless. They can argue with the Bible and make points with Scripture about issues‚ but when they are asked what makes the bible reliable they don’t know what to say. The majority of people these days
Premium New Testament God Logic
Glossary An argument web is an argument which is both multi-reason and multi-layer. A chain of reasoning is a multi-layer argument. Usually the term is applied to arguments with more than two layers. A claim is a proposition put forward by somebody as true. A proposition is an idea which is either true or false. Collectively exhaustive (CE): Within a group‚ considerations should cover all the relevant‚ serious arguments; they should leave no gaps. CE is the second aspect of the MECE rule. A conclusion
Premium Logic Argument map Argument