Business Law Introduction A business consists of trade of any profession or vocation. Business law looks at the formation of the business and the contracts plus legislations within it. The body of a business has rules and regulations that business law enforces enabling it to govern the transactions between business entities. In relation to that is commercial law. Marketing‚ Bankruptcy‚ contracts and trade in general are all under commercial law. In this assignment I will be assessing that
Premium Contract
Business Law “The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 has to be watched very carefully. It has often been supposed to cast a veil on the personality of a limited company through which the courts cannot see. But that is not true. The courts can‚ and often do‚ draw aside the veil. They can‚ and often do‚ pull off the mark. They look to see what really lies behind” - Lord Denning in Littlewoods Mail Order Stores v Inland revenue Commissioners [1969] 3 All ER 422.
Premium Corporation Law
judiciary to apply statutory interpretation‚ to interpret words of a given Act‚ to give them an exact meaning and to give them legal effect. Statutory interpretation is an integral part of the court ruling process‚ as the role of a judge is to apply the law‚ not make it. When trying to establish Parliament’s intention within an Act‚ there are various aids available to help. Firstly‚ there are three approaches to interpretation. The first of these is the literal rule‚ where‚ according to Martin (2007)1
Premium Law Common law
Jonah Watson Business Law Case Analysis #3 IN YOUR COURT A remedy is the relief provided for an innocent party when the other party has breached the contract. There are two types of remedies; remedies in equity and remedies at law. Remedies in equity are only awarded only if the remedy at law is inadequate. Remedies at law normally award monetary damages Ken‚ the owner of a famous candy store‚ and Sweet‚ Inc. have entered into a contract‚ essentially designating Sweet‚ Inc. as his
Premium Damages Tort Contract
faith‚ statement which are only partially true or distort the truth‚ and the statement which are true at the time of making but change before the contract is entered into. There must be a false statement of fact or law as oppose to opinion or estimate of future events in the case of Bisset v Wilkinson3. At the same time the representation must be untrue. And the person making the representation must know that it is false‚ or not believe in its truth‚ or be recklessly careless. And the representation
Premium Contract Contract law
------------------------------------------------- Prepared for: ------------------------------------------------- Mr John M. Andre (Lecturer) ------------------------------------------------- Unit 5: Aspects of Contract and Negligence for Business ------------------------------------------------- Banking Academy‚ Hanoi ------------------------------------------------- Submission Date: 19th November 2012 ------------------------------------------------- No of words: 3100 words -------------------------------------------------
Premium Contract Contract law
“something for something” or the exchange of promises from each party-from the promisor to the promise-which turns the agreement into a contract. Contracts are the basis of the business and therefore understanding the law of contract is essential for persons wishing to engage in business. There would be no business without contracts. To make a contract legally enforceable six prerequisites should be followed. They are intention to create legal relations‚ agreement‚ consideration‚ legal capacity
Premium Contract Common law
Washington Mutual Bank vs. Superior Court Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court Breach of Contract by the Washington Mutual Bank In most cases‚ a breach of contract takes place in circumstances whereby one party does not perform exactly and precisely his or her contract obligations. These cases have been recorded mostly in the real estate industry. This is because the majority of sellers normally wish to vacate the house they are selling hastily. The Washington Mutual Bank victimized
Premium Law Contract United States
question is whether Micky has a contract with Ureach Mobile Co. Section 11 of Contracts Act 1950 provides who are competent to contract‚ that is those who are of the age of majority according to the law to which she is subject‚ have sound mind‚ and not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject (KrishnanL‚ RajooL‚ & VergisA.C‚2009). On the other hand‚ the Age of Majority Act 1971 states that the age of majority is 18 years and above‚ and anyone below that age would be regarded
Premium Contract
concept in Business Law. However this does not stop the courts from lifting or piercing the veil to see what lies beneath. Critically discuss this statement citing the relevant case law. As is evident with most principles of law there are exceptions to the doctrine of separate legal personality. The courts will generally depart from the principle separate corporate personality in certain instances where tools such as enemy‚ agency and fraud are used to pierce the corporate veil. Debdor v Wilkinson
Premium Corporation Subsidiary Holding company