contract who is of age of majority according to law to which he is subject‚ and who is of sound mind‚ and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.” It means that the following three categories of persons are not competent to contract. 1. A person who has not attained the age of majority‚ i.e.‚ one who is minor. 2. A person who is of unsound mind 3. A person who has been disqualified from contracting by some law. Although the above mentioned categories of
Premium Contract
Part A (a): Ethical dilemma Should Tom tell Michael that Brenda is breaking the rules/law. Ethical egoism Under ethical egoism‚ Tom should tell Michael what Brenda is doing‚ as he is feeling worried and guilty and this would ease his mind. He could also gain benefits from Michael. Tom would do this because he is promoting his well being above everyone else’s (QUT‚ 2011). Utilitarianism Under Utilitarianism‚ Tom should tell Michael about Brenda and Mary’s arrangement‚ because Utilitarianism
Premium Ethics Morality Virtue
QUESTION Running late for his exciting evening law class‚ Sam desperately seeks out a car park in the CBD of Melbourne‚ state of Victoria Australia. He spots the car park operated by Citipark Ltd. Sam drives up a ramp which has raised concrete barriers on either side. As it is rush hour‚ there are a few cars in front of him and soon some more line up behind him. Sam stopped his car at the barrier entrance of the car park which had a mechanical arm preventing cars moving into the parking
Premium Parking Parking lot Parking space
oppressive and unfair scenario. Therefore‚ the motion for preliminary injunction was denied in favor of the defendants. Facts: The defendants‚ upon being hired by Russell‚ entered into contracts which contained three relevant covenants in this case; not to compete with the plaintiffs‚ not to solicit the plaintiff’ customers‚ and not to disclose the plaintiffs’ confidential information. The defendants‚ for many alleged reasons‚ separated themselves from the plaintiff and began working for a competitor
Premium Legal terms Defendant Plaintiff
The preliminary issue in the question is fast food restaurant is vicariously liable for the Cathy’s negligence. Since the concerns about the law of tort‚ the following analysis will focus on the possible tortuous liability instead of the potential breach of the contractual obligation and the criminal acts. In principle of vicarious liability‚ to make an employer liable for a wrong committed by an employee‚ the plaintiff must establish that: 1. defendant is an employee ( as opposed to an independent
Premium Tort law Employment Vicarious liability
Field course ‘Developing for Markets’ 2011 Case 2 BD Group: Introducing the Chicka Phone 1 Contents Introduction: 3 Part 1 - Influencing market acceptance in a consumer market 3 1.1 Knowledge phase 3 1.2 Persuasion phase 4 1.3 Decision phase 4 1.4 Implementation phase 4 1.5 Confirmation phase 4 Part 2 - Influencing market acceptance in a B2B market 4 2.1 Influencing individual members of the DMU 5 2.2 Influencing the customer firm 5 2.3 Influencing a whole market segment
Premium Marketing Decision making Diffusion of innovations
Final Paper Case Study 11 In the Final Paper (Case Study) it speaks to the following case and circumstances. Knarles and Barkley are father and son respectively. Barkley is seventeen years old. They operate a facilities maintenance company that regularly does business in the District of Columbia‚ Maryland and Virginia. The company is based in Maryland. They have a number of contracts with building owners where they have agreed to provide building maintenance to both residential and commercial
Premium Contract
AB107 Business Law Written Assignment Advise whether the terms of the Licence Agreement apply and whether the Exclusion of Liability clause is valid and effective in protecting UcanB007 from liabilities. [pic] The foremost issue pertaining to this case is that of whether the terms of the License Agreement are part of the contract between Ah Siong and UcanB007‚ and hence the enforceability of the terms should Ah Siong decide to sue UcanB007 in contract for his losses. Due to the nature of this
Premium Contract
Requesting approval for payment; on 03/27/17 we received a payment request totaling $1‚491‚390 ($1‚225‚000 Loss & $266‚390) involving our Public Auto XOL contract effective 01/01/13. Our current o/s reserve is $1‚451‚950‚ an increase of $35‚558 in the loss adjustment expense is required‚ which will increase our total incurred to $1‚491‚390. The required pay time form has been tasked to K. Haniff. IAT issued a commercial auto policy effective 10/01/13 – 10/01/14 with limits of $5‚000‚000‚ the date
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Investment Driving under the influence
When Should Your Business Offer Health Insurance? Since the introduction of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)‚ health insurance has changed drastically. If you operate a business‚ a lot of these changes affect you‚ regardless if you offer health insurance or not. If you are considering offering health insurance to your employees‚ then you should take these changes into account along with other information that may affect your decision. Certain Employers Are Required to Offer Health Insurance Once the
Premium Health care Health insurance Medicine