think about why do we have laws? and do we really need them? Frank Trippetts explains why many people today don’t follow the laws he also talks about the importance of the laws. Trippetts argument is to show people why they should not break the law no matter how big or small the law is. He goes on explaining how millions of americans never think twice before breaking the law. The author’s tone is critical to the millions of americans. Some people might think that the laws are unnecessary and people
Premium Firearm Gun politics in the United States Gun
I would not say that breaking the law is morally wrong because everyone has their perception of reality. Some individuals may think that breaking the law is morally wrong because of how they were raised while others may disagree. However‚ a particular situation may require breaking the law may be the only option to get the desired result that one may need to live a full life. In certain situation‚ peoples’ actions‚ can be justified if they provide the enough evidence as to why they did what they
Premium
There were times in history when breaking the law was justified: great leaders like Gandhi and Martin Luther King broke the law and changed the world for the better. Breaking the law is morally justifiable and acceptable when the law in itself is iniquitous and if that law violates human rights and conscience; Certainly‚ rules are established for us to follow but we as human beings should be able to differentiate the right and the wrong and incase laws need to be violated for the right cause even
Premium United States World War II Nonviolence
Anav Pradhan (GP2) Can breaking the law ever be justified? Imagine a world without those brave people who dared to not abide by the law and fight for a right. A world without Gandhi would be a world without independent India; without Mandela there would be white superiority in Africa; without freedom fighters‚ there would be no democracy in Nepal. I believe that all the actions of such law breakers are good‚ even though they were against various laws‚ and such actions can be justified to some extent
Premium Law Human rights Ku Klux Klan
after Dr. Moreau died the beast-men did not fear punishment of the Law since there was no one to punish them. The beast-men’s animal characteristics seemed to come back quicker because it was what felt more natural. So without society and rules to follow‚ the beast-men started becoming less civilized and reverted back to their
Premium Frankenstein Mary Shelley KILL
political system where people can choose and replace officials through free and fair elections‚ the active participation of the people as citizens‚ in politics and civil life‚ the protection of the human rights of all citizens‚ and a rule of law where all laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens. Physical torture techniques (strikes to the body and using everyday instruments to inflict physical torture) were first recorded in “military punishments‚ especially among British lists of punishments;
Premium Torture September 11 attacks
Can breaking the law ever be justified? Any country or a place has its set of rules or laws. They are made in order to keep the place safe and peaceful. Some may have a set of rules while others may have rules that are open to changes and additions. These rules are set to govern people and keep them in discipline. However‚ as the saying goes ‘rules are meant to be broken’. Many people are found breaking these laws. No one in the world always follows the rule. It might be a small rule they might
Premium Law Crime Criminology
Before a person breaks a law in an attempt to accomplish a greater good‚ he or she should exhaust all options available under the law. In an attempt to accomplish a greater good‚ a person should not cause serious harm. A person must have sufficient knowledge and authority before acting on behalf of another person (or animal‚ in this case). No one is obliged to obey unjust laws that suppress one group while elevating others. In breaking the law in an attempt to accomplish a greater good
Premium Debut albums English-language films Psychology
Is murder ever justifiable? “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”. This universal phrase‚ used by Ghandi many years ago‚ is still used to reinforce the fact that if one murders another they don’t deserve to be killed. If people thought like this the human race would come to extinction. Many believe that if someone was to kill your loved one‚ you would have the right to kill in retaliation. If someone kills (who do they kill) do they deserve to be killed? The answer is no‚ because regardless
Premium Murder Capital punishment Life imprisonment
might led to terrible consequences. The term justifiable homicide can be defined as the killing of another individual as a self-defense in order to protect oneself against or another person. According to the textbook “… (1) whether the defendant reasonably feared that he or she needed to use force to defend himself or herself” (2014‚ p. 306). In addition‚ if an individual feels imminent threat‚ excessive force‚ or reasonable fear or force justifiable homicide can be used as a form of defense when
Premium Crime Murder Capital punishment