TITLE: Eastman kodak company: funtime films QUESTION: is kodak doing the right thing with the decision to have line extension: kodak gold plus‚ kodak royal gold and kodak funtime? Support your statement. On my opinion that is good and right movement to have line extension and repositioning. The problem in this case is that Kodak enjoyed its overwhelming power through the years in US market without really doing anything. There was steadily decreasing market share and shareholder value in the
Premium Stock market Stock
Kuzņecovs To: Inese Eglīte RBS Professor‚ Marketing Management Riga‚ 22nd of October‚ 2009 Case Study 4 Summary: Eastman Kodak Company – Funtime Film Question: Is Kodak doing the right thing with the decision to have line extension: Gold Plus‚ Royal Gold and Funtime? If we consider protection and growth of Kodak’s total market share to be the key objective then the introduction of a new brand in the Economy price-tier is a strategic MUST. It is crucial to be presented in the Economy tier
Premium Marketing Brand
Title: Eastman Kodak Company: Funtime Films Question: Is Kodak doing the right thing with the decision to have line proliferation: Kodak Gold Plus‚ Kodak Royal Gold and Kodak Funtime? Support your statement if yes‚ if no‚ please provide practical suggestions what to do instead. Kodak is (in 1993) the dominant market player in U.S. with market share of 70%. In last 5 years the market share of Kodak decreased by 6 %. The main competitors are Fuji Photo Film Co (11% market share) and Konica
Premium Photographic film Marketing Fujifilm
Problem of the case CEO of Kodak had to set out new strategy for film products‚ because during January 17 and January 24‚ 1994‚ Kodak lost 8% in value on rumors if a price cut. Kodak was still a dominant in photo film market‚ but he had a lot of competitors like Fuji Co. and Konica Corp. They were offering consumers lower priced products. Market share of Kodak was falling from about 76% to 70% over the past five years. Kodak introduced new product‚ Funtime Film‚ which would be priced at lower
Premium Brand Marketing Advertising
Kodak: Funtime Film Case Analysis Marco Cader Prof. Fruzzetti MRKT 4001 12/13/2012 I. Situation Analysis Eastman Kodak Company‚ founded in 1889 by George Eastman‚ was the prime manufacturer and distributor of easy-use cameras and films. Films being their main product of grandeur; Kodak stood out above all competitors by all means. By the first hundreds of years‚ Kodak had the highest market share in the film industry‚ both globally and in the United States. Things were about to change
Premium Photographic film Brand Advertising
INTRODUCCION Eastman Kodak sufre un significativo declive en su cuota de Mercado a manos de productores de marcas de bajo precio y marcas propias. Este caso presenta la propuesta de George Fisher‚ CEO de Kodak para lanzar una nueva marca economica para combatir esos rivales. Categorizada por Fortune 500 con $20 millones en ganancias en 1994‚ Kodak es una empresa estadounidense dedicada a proveer equipos de fotografia y suministros. Hoy en dia‚ la compania involucra cada vez mas la tecnologia digital
Premium Conocimiento Segmentación de mercado Empresa
In year 1994‚ KODAK had important strategic decisions to make in order to ensure that a bright future is waiting for KODAK. At that time‚ although Kodak was dominating the consumer photographic film market‚ it had been facing a 6% decline in market share over a five year period. The reasons for KODAK’s market share loss could be examined in two major parts; supply effect and demand effect. SUPPLY EFFECT DEMAND EFFECT -Attractive
Premium Brand Strategic management Marketing
Eastman Kodak – Case Analysis Problem The problem in this case is concerned with Eastman Kodak losing its market share in film products to lower-priced economy brands. Over the last five years‚ in addition to being brand-aware‚ customers have also become price-conscious. This has resulted in the fast paced growth of lower priced segments in which Kodak has no presence. Kodak plans to address this issue by introducing a new brand‚ “Funtime” in the economy brand segment. Kodak also proposes to replace
Premium Brand Marketing Revenue
To: David Tsiklauri Case: Eastman Kodak Company: Funtime Film Problem Definition: From the beginning of the case Kodak’s problem is clearly seen. During January 17 and 24 Kodak stock had lost 8% in value. Also Kodak market share fell by 6%‚ from 76% to 70% over the past five years. Also the market annual unit growth rate averaged only 2% while the main competitors’ averages were much more impressive – 15% of Fuji and Polaroid and 10% private labels. The problem is that Kodak is losing its market
Premium Marketing Brand
Eastman Kodak Company: Funtime Film 1. Diagnose the reasons for Kodak’s market share loss and make your assessment of the likely development of the market if Kodak maintained the status quo. Kodak has been losing market share for the past five years to the point it has gone from 76% to 70%. The underlying causes that have generated such losses and have ultimately led consumers to favor competing brands with larger growth are: I. Consumers are tending to view film as a commodity‚ often
Premium Brand Marketing Brand management