Case Study 3 a) What events or condition above may cause substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern? Events or condition that may cause substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern are the first one‚ because of the high competition in the industry‚ it has affected the sales of the Fast Go. The effect of vigorous competition in the markets has makes it difficult for Fast Go to attract and retain customers and to grow their customer
Premium Auditing Audit External auditor
show that the loss suffered by the claimant was reasonably foreseeable. In the case of Hedly Byrne and Co vs Hedler and Partners Ltd‚ where there was a special relationship between parties‚ there could be a duty of care for financial loss caused by a negligent misstatement. However‚ there was a valid disclaimer as the advice given by Heller was headed without responsibility and the defendant was not liable. In this case‚ Aiman & Co were not liable since there is no special relationship between parties
Premium Audit Auditing External auditor
a going concern audit issue. Participants in Experiment One involve 92 auditor from multiple offices of three Big 4 audit firm which is 48 seniors‚ 29 managers and 15 senior managers. The range of audit experience are 3 to 13 years with a mean experience of 5.4 years. Overall‚ 80 percent of participants reported being involved in audit engagements where substantial doubt existed about the client’s going concern aassumption. While two-thirds of participants shown at least one audit engagement where
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Management
time to see if they are reasonable. Most auditors should have detected this kind of material misstatement in company’s financial results‚ because this defalcation is caused by a personal factor. c) We should forecast its audit procedure in order to eliminate the risks in audit progress. Thus‚ control procedure would have been effective in preventing or detecting the defalcation could have been a separation of duties. 2. a) Since the purchasing agent usually set up wrong purchase orders to factious
Premium Internal control Financial audit Balance sheet
WorldCom The Story of a Whistleblower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5 Hollinger International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Realities of Audit-Related Litigation instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute a day in the life of brent dorsey staff auditor Professional Pressures inS tr uc t ional o b je c t ive
Premium Ethics Auditing Audit
Abstract: The audit function creates several important relationships among the various parties. One of the most significant and potentially problematic relationships is between the audit firm and the audit client. The decision by the audit firm to accept or retain a client is crucial because of the potential risk of being associated with certain clients. Engagement risk is considered to be composed of three components: client’s business risk‚ audit risk‚ and auditor’s business risk. Client’s
Premium Audit Financial audit Auditing
Recovery Audit Contract Prior Government Accountability Office work has helped identify problems with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service’s actions to address improper payment vulnerabilities‚ and Department of Health and Human Service states that “prior Office of Inspector General(OIG) work identified problems with CMS’s inability to address referrals of potential fraud” (URL 2011). Hence‚ Congress created the Recovery Audit Contractor Program that was designed specifically to protect Medicare
Premium Health care Medicine Health economics
Audit Case- Tommy O’Connell The audit case I chose was case #1‚ Tommy O’Connell- Audit Senior. O’Connell is a newly appointed senior auditor for a big 5 firm‚ and he was given the tough audit engagement for the Altamesa Manufacturing Company. Tommy figured this engagement would help him get in good with the partner that was in charge of the audit‚ Jack Morrison. The only problem was he was assigned Carl‚ who is a fresh-faced staff accountant who has been working at the company for less than three
Premium Audit Financial audit Auditing
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.5 Collins Harp Enterprises 5.6 Sarbox Scooter‚ Inc. 5.7 Société Générale Recommending IT Systems Development Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Scoping and Evaluation Judgments in the Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How a Low-Risk Trading Area Caused a $7.2 Billion Loss instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute instructor resource Manual
Premium Internal control Auditing Audit
Gale A. Norton‚ Attorney General Martha Phillips Allbright‚ Chief Deputy Attorney General Richard A. Westfall‚ Solicitor General Merrill Shields‚ Deputy Attorney General Linda A. Siderius‚ First Assistant Attorney General Victoria R. Mandell‚ Assistant Attorney General Regulatory Law Section Denver‚ Colorado Attorneys for Petitioner Isaacson Rosenbaum Woods & Levy‚ P.C. Sheldon E. Friedman Scott S. Evans Denver‚ Colorado Attorneys for Respondent Kevin O. O’Brien Boulder‚ Colorado
Premium Colorado Accountant Certified Public Accountant