In the mid 1990’s Nike started facing criticism after several articles were released showing the poor labor conditions of its workers in sweatshops in places like China‚ Japan‚ and other Asian countries. As early as 1993 reports started being released about the poor working conditions. One such report was a CBS exposé by Roberta Baskin describing the working conditions of the Indonesian women working in the factories‚ explaining that they were making only $1.30 a day. During the report she criticized
Premium Ethics Business ethics Utilitarianism
the world’s focus on manufacturing methods‚ specifically the use of sweatshops. The term ‘sweatshop’ in today’s world has gained a predominantly negative connotation due to the Western perspective of this establishment. It evokes a variety of emotions from people without a great deal of understanding of what the term describes or the reasons for its existence. As always‚ every issue has two sides‚ and in the case of sweatshops‚ it can be viewed as either the violation of human rights and dignity
Premium Employment Wage Economics
Interpersonal Behavior in the Workplace: Trust Nike Inc.‚ the sports apparel multinational company has been under suspicion and scrutiny for their practice of the unfair treatment and negligent labor habits in their offshore factories. They have been criticized for human rights abuse‚ child labor law violations‚ as well as minimum wages and trade union relations violations within a number of Asian countries. They subsequently misguided the public in an attempt to make one believe there is no
Premium Wage Minimum wage Employment
Sweatshops need to be stopped‚ they are manufacturing establishments where employees are forced to work long hours‚ under terrible conditions to create products for minimum wage just so transnational companies can make their fortunes. They are a horrific way to produce products‚ and need to be banished. There are three reasons why sweatshops should be stopped‚ and they are‚ that sweatshops have horrible working conditions‚ Unfair wages and unfair hours‚ and children aren’t able to experience a normal
Premium Sweatshop United States Industrial Revolution
Nowadays‚ sweatshops are becoming more and more obvious all around the world‚ especially in the developing countries. In the article “Two cheers for sweatshops”‚ Nicholas D Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn note that sweatshops play an important role not only in people’s daily life but also in the national economy‚ even though there are some shortages of them. However‚ Tom Hayden and Charles Kernaghan give their idea in “Pennies an hour and no way up”‚ that the conditions of workers in sweatshops should be
Premium Working class Nicholas D. Kristof Wage
The treatment slaves endured were inhumane in that they were treated like animals. One way this can be seen is through the marks placed upon them like brandings. Sethe has whip lashes that she perceives as a chokecherry tree while her mother was burned with a circle and cross on her rids. This is also the only true interaction Sethe had with her mother. This could also be seen as to why Sethe does not wish to become attached to any important people in her life probably due to her mother’s non existent
Premium Slavery Slavery in the United States Family
"Free Exchange for Mutual Benefit: Sweatshops and Maitland ’s "Classical Liberal Standard" " Thomas Carson ’s article criticize Ian Maitland ’s arguments in defense of sweatshops‚ based on Ian ’s view of "the Classical Liberal Standard" published in 1997‚ in the Brithish Academy of Managment Annual Conference Proceedings. Ian ’s central thesis‚ is a defence of the sweatshops in the poor countries in the third world‚ statinig that "A wage or labor practice is ethically acceptable if it is
Premium Corporation Third World Multinational corporation
Case study: Nike: the Sweatshop Debate 1) Should Nike be held responsible for working condition in factories that it does not own‚ but where sub-contractors make products for Nike? Nike doesn’t own any manufacturing facilities and outsource its production. Therefore‚ it can’t be directly blamed for terrible working conditions. Nike can influence indirectly on working conditions at contracting factories thorough refusing to work with sweatshop factories. However‚ Nike‚ like any other capitalistic
Premium Labor Business ethics
Ethics and sweatshops Companies want to maximize profits‚ while employees want to maximize salaries and benefits. Unfortunately these two desires do not always go hand in hand. The best way for a company to treat its employee how they wish to be treated. Make decisions that are in the best interest of all stakeholders. The Golden Rule still holds true. Companies have a responsibility to its employees and employees have a responsibility to its employer. When leadership treats its workers unfairly
Premium Ethics Business ethics
The Benefit of Sweatshops Robert Gelber Integrative Seminar 300 Professor Duclos Alegue April 28th‚ 2011 Abstract: Many countries‚ industries and people are becoming more affected by sweatshops in different ways because of they’re continuous increase in growth. Sweatshops benefit many developing countries as they provide opportunities of employment to the people living in poverty and benefit the community at large by creating an economic infrastructure that utilizes the country’s resources and
Premium Minimum wage Developing country Third World