Apportionment Using the Hamilton Method Dawn Ambrose Argosy University- On-line MAT109 A01 Instructor: Marcus Vandiver Apportionment Using the Hamilton Method Using the Hamilton method of apportionment‚ determine the number of seats each state should receive. Using the numbers you just calculated from applying the Hamilton method‚ determine the average constituency for each state. Explain your decision making process for allocating the remaining seats. As can be seen in the chart above
Premium Decision theory State Decision making
The apportionment method and its constant revamping is a true sign of a democracy trying to obtain equal representation for all of its citizens. Over the last 230 years‚ the reapportionment of the congressional districts has changed approximately five times. All of these changes occurred because the number of people represented increased and also because of the addition of three states‚ New Mexico‚ Alaska and Arizona. The types of apportionment methods had their plusses and negatives. The Jefferson
Premium United States President of the United States Voting
CHAPTER 14: APPORTIONMENT I. Basics Example 1: Suppose a country consists of five states (North‚ South‚ East‚ West and Central) and representation in the National Assembly should be in proportion to each state’s population. The latest census figures are: |North | 9279 | |South | 7217 | |East | 5155 | |West | 3093 | |Central | 2062 | |Total |26‚806 | If there are 26 seats in the Assembly‚ how should they
Premium Thomas Jefferson United States State
Mitt Romney‚ Republican presidential candidate for the 2012 presidency‚ is a very interesting individual to examine. His conservative background is evident based on his current platform. I use the word current because he does tend to flip-flop on his beliefs. In regards to abortion‚ Romney opposes abortion and does not support embryonic stem cell research. He supports the repeal of Roe vs. Wade. Ironically‚ he is in total support of capital punishment. Continuing to look at health care‚ Romney
Premium Embryonic stem cell Stem cell Roe v. Wade
The Apportionment Problem Module 5 Assignment 1 Bobbi Brooks Argosy University‚ Seattle For this assignment‚ I needed to find out how many representatives are going to be assigned to each of the 10 states in the newly democratic nations. The first step was to add all of the state’s populations together. The total population is 532‚188. The next step was to divide each individual states population by the total population to see how many seats that each state should receive for representation
Premium United States House of Representatives State World population
Allocation and Apportionment of Overheads / Job and Batch costing solution Question 1 (a) Overhead Analysis Sheet Overheads Basis of apportionment Total Machining Assembly Stores Canteen Indirect Wages Number of indirect employees 232000 ( X 232000) ( X 232000) ( X 232000) ( X 232000) 61867 123733 30933 15467 Machinery Maintenance Budgeted machine hours ( X 94000) ( X 94000) 94000 87935 6065 Machinery Insurance Value of machinery ( X 9050) ( X 9050) 9020 6380 2640 Rent
Premium Costs Machine Variable cost
Hamilton begins by highlighting the common misunderstanding that mythology depicts the blissful state of man in his original harmony with nature. On the contrary‚ Hamilton notes‚ the lives of ancient people were not romantic and beautiful‚ but full of hardship‚ disease‚ and violence. For Hamilton‚ the Greek myths are remarkable in that they show how far the Greeks‚ an ancient civilization‚ had advanced beyond a primitive state of savagery and brutality. By the time Homer wrote his epic‚ the Iliad
Premium Religion Greek mythology God
Technology 100 (2009) 1192–1196 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Bioresource Technology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biortech Optimization of culture conditions for hydrogen production by Ethanoligenens harbinense B49 using response surface methodology Wan-Qian Guo a‚ Nan-Qi Ren a‚*‚ Xiang-Jing Wang b‚ Wen-Sheng Xiang b‚ Jie Ding a‚ Yang You a‚ Bing-Feng Liu a a b State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment‚ Harbin Institute of Technology‚ Harbin
Premium Hydrogen Acid 2008
CASE # 1 – HAMILTON POWER TOOLS CORPORATION (abbreviated) (read this brief case and attempt all questions at end – original thinking backed by logical and creative use of marketing and business related concepts learnt in classrooms and drawn from real world success/failure situations is expected) On July 13th ‚ 1978‚ Mr Campagna‚ the marketing manager for Hamilton Tools‚ was anxiously awaiting his meeting with the marketing research firm. He felt the findings from the marketing research would change
Premium Marketing
Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center‚ Inc.‚ 555 P.2d 696 (1976). Facts: The appellee was terminated from the Lovington Good Samaritan Center‚ Inc. on June 4‚ 1974. On June 12‚ 1974 Mrs. Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits. She was initially disqualified from seven weeks of benefits by a deputy of the Unemployment Security Commission. Mrs. Mitchell then filed an appeal‚ and the Appeal Tribunal reversed the deputy’s decision. Mrs. Mitchell’s benefits were reinstated on
Premium Court Appeal Appellate court