search the vehicle. Darisse found cocaine‚ and Heien was arrested and charged with attempted trafficking.” After denial of his motion to suppress‚ defendant entered a guilty plea in the North Carolina Superior Court… the North Carolina Court of Appeals reversed…The North
Premium Appellate court Supreme court Appeal
(acquittal) in the District Court‚ could an appeal could be brought to the Circuit Court by the prosecution as provided for in S. 310 of the Fisheries (Consolidation) Act 1959? • The relevant precedent: The People (DPP) v O’Shea [1982]. • 3-2 majority of the SC: an appeal against an acquittal lies to the Supreme Court from the Central Criminal Court. • Two members of the majority (O’Higgins and Walsh JJ) suggested the SC could order a retrial if the appeal was successful; other majority judge (Hederman)
Premium Law Tort Jury
The purpose of this report is to evaluate the performance of the Hamilton county judges‚ in three different courts. The data is compiled from information gathered over a three year period and includes a total of 182‚908 cases handled by 38 judges in Common Pleas Court‚ Domestic Relations Court‚ and Municipal Court. The information presented should help determine how many cases have been appealed‚ reversed‚ or a combination of stated variables which will help determine the amount of errors made
Premium Court Appeal Judge
Court visit report My first court visit was a civil appeal case under the hierarchy of appellant jurisdiction at the Intermediate court and my second visit was a criminal case under the original of criminal jurisdiction at the district court. Both courts are found in Port Louis‚ Mauritius. The difference between the two courts is that the appellant jurisdiction was already heard in a lower court whereas the criminal jurisdiction was heard for the first time in the lower court. The atmosphere and
Premium Appeal Criminal law Court
awarded back pay and compensatory damages‚ as well as court costs and attorney’s fees. On appeal to the Fifth Circuit‚ U.S. Court of Appeals‚ the City of Houston challenged the judgment on the grounds that it did not have notice of the harassment until April 1992 and that her notification to her supervisor should not have constituted notice to the city. The District Court’s ruling was affirmed by the Appeals Court. 3. Main Issue: Can a supervisor’s knowledge of harassing behavior be imputed to the
Premium Police Appeal Constable
Common law reasoning and institutions Study Pack page 11 6 ‘The Judicial Practice of Precedent’ Adam Gearey Staff and students of the University of London External Laws Programme are reminded that copyright subsists in this extract and the work from which it was taken. This copy has been made under a licence from the Copyright Licensing Agency of the UK (www.cla.co.uk). Any digital or printed copy supplied to or made by you under the terms of this licence is for use in connection with this course
Premium Common law Appeal Law
|Procedures under State Vat law applies to |CST Act and Rules prescribe very few procedures like forms for registration and concessional | |CST in many cases |rate of purchase. In case of other procedures like returns‚ appeal‚ refund‚ interest‚ penalties‚| | |recovery etc.‚ provisions as per State laws apply. | |Registration of a dealer |Every dealer who effects inter-state
Premium Value added tax United States Appeal
benefits where she was denied by the deputy of the Unemplyment Security Commission; July 24 1974‚ Mrs. Mitchell applied for an appeal‚ where she then received a reinstatement of benefits on August 28 1974. On September 13 1974 appealed the decision of the Appeal Tribunal to the whole Commission pursuant to s 59-9-6(E)‚ N.M.S.A..1953. The commission overruled the Appeal Tribunal an re-instated the seven week disqualification period. Mrs.Mitchell applied for and was granted ceritiorari from
Premium Appeal Law Court
of Polly Baker‚” a sardonically aggressive tone reflects the speaker’s attitude towards the charges being made for having a fifth “bastard child.” The tone feeds her persuasive appeals. By appealing to pathos and ethics‚ she convinces the Court to not punish her for her actions. Baker’s use of diction furthers her appeal to pathos. Being an “unhappy” woman‚ she pleads the “Honourable Bench” to relieve her of the “heavy fine” she now faces. The repetition of “Fine” emphasizes her never ending debt
Premium Rhetoric Appeal Court
the most professional manner‚ as the surgeon did not perform carelessly. Thus‚ the surgeon did not increase the risk and should not be held liable. 4) Decision/ Result It was a split decision‚ 3:2 (Lord Bingham & Lord Hoffman dissenting). The appeal was dismiss‚ thus the court was in favor of the plaintiff. 5) Reasoning/ Rationale During the original trial‚ the judge found that the plaintiff would have not undergone the surgical procedure so soon‚ if she had knew
Premium Appeal Surgery Law