THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE MELBOURNE LAW SCHOOL CORPORATE LAW BLAW20001 2013 Subject Coordinator: Associate Professor Helen Anderson |A. WELCOME TO CORPORATE LAW | |B. INTRODUCTORY MATTERS | |C. LECTURE OUTLINE‚ READING GUIDE and TUTORIAL PROGRAM | |D. SKILLS ASSIGNMENT |
Premium Board of directors Corporation Corporations law
T he Sisyphean Corporation The Sisyphean Corporation is considering investing in a new cane manufacturing machine that has an estimated life of three years. The cost of the machine is $30‚000 and the machine will be depreciated straight line over its three-year life to a residual value of $0. The cane manufacturing machine will result in sales of 2‚000 canes in year 1. Sales are estimated to grow by 10% per year each year through year three. The price per cane that Sisyphean will charge
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Accounts receivable
ANSWERS TO AICPA QUESTIONS CHAPTER 10 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE INTERNET 1. (a) Computer software is covered under the general copyright laws and is therefore usually copyrightable as an expression of ideas. Answer (b) is incorrect because copyrights in general do not need a copyright notice for works published after March 1‚ 1989. Answer (c) is incorrect because a recent court ruled that programs in both source codes‚ which are human readable‚ and in machine readable object
Premium Contract Contract law
Lecturer’s expectations In this section‚ one of your lecturers - Loretta Inglis - sets out what she expects from student assignments on this topic. I expect that you will read all the information that has been given in the subject outline to help you to write the case study. There is a wealth of information there. Ideally‚ I expect consistent quality throughout all the sections of the report. You need to leave enough time to plan and write each section carefully. I expect that your Problem Identification
Premium Problem solving Case study Scientific method
THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE COMMLAW 7011 CORPORATE LAW (M) BUSINESS SCHOOL Week 3‚ Semester 1‚ 2012 TUTORIAL QUESTIONS WEEK 3 (Commencing Monday 12 March) Acknowledgement: These Tutorial Questions were originally devised by Martin Markovic‚ Senior Lecturer‚ Business School‚ University of Adelaide. Question 1 A‚ B and C are long time friends from University days. They share common interests especially with respect to
Premium Corporation Business Computer
1. What is the Corporate Level Strategy that Viacom is using? Give examples of Operational Relatedness and Corporate Relatedness to back up your answer. The Corporate Level Strategy that Viacom is using: Several business level strategy‚ they are using the decentralize approach to management and providing the high powered incentive for divisional managers‚ which mean employ a separate business-level strategy for each product market area to dealing with product and geographic diversity
Premium Economics MTV Management
BABCOCK UNIVERSITY‚ ILISAN-REMO‚ OGUN STATE AN ASSIGNMENT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE COURSE: CORPORATE LAW 1 ASSIGNMENT TOPIC: CRITICALLY EXAMINE THE EXTENT TO WHICH A COMPANY IS BOUND TO A PRE-INCORPORATION CONTRACT SUBMITTED BY: EYESAN ORITSEMOLEBI MATRIC NO: 10/0399 SUBMITTED TO: MR. ABANGWU NZERIBE
Premium Common law Contract
Question 1 (1) The maintenance of share capital principle is share capital. Share capital is the contribution made by shareholder by subscribing shares of the company. A company’s creditors can only look to the share capital for payment in the event of a winding up. A general rule known as the rule in Trevor v Whitworth was established in order to protect shareholders and creditors. It prohibits a company from reducing its share capital due to a reduction in capital would prejudice the rights of
Premium Corporate governance Board of directors
The issue of this case is whether the board of Katia was in breach of the director’s duties. In determining this issue‚ the legal principles in Corporate Act section 181 as well as Howard Smith v Ampol Petroleum‚ Whitehouse v Carlton Hotel‚ Mills v Mills‚ Ngurli v McCann‚ Harlowe’s Nominees v Woodside Oil and Winthrop Investments v Winns should be considered. S 181 states that directors should exercise their powers in good faith and proper purpose. Subjective tests (which concerns whether the
Premium Stock Takeover Fiduciary
Werribee. He leaves it parked there overnight‚ intending to drive it to a remote dump the next day. A municipal inspector sees the truck in the yard and discovers that the soil in the truck is toxic waste. The inspector tells Alex that the law forbids storing such materials near a river or river bed without a special permit. Alex admits that the soil is contaminated and says that he cannot produce a permit. The Werribee River is three kilometres from the haulage company’s yard.
Premium Contract