would be a such thing as ’good’ if there were no rules. There would be nothing to compare it to. If there were no models for people to say "okay‚ this is a good person‚ and this is a bad person" then we couldn’t really say what’s good or bad. I think the existence of rules keeps people from deviating from the norm for fear of consequences‚ but if there were no negative consequences for people’s actions‚ people could ideally‚ do whatever they wanted without fear of retribution or being outcasted. Imagine
Premium Thought Mind English-language films
Deiparine -2MKB A World without Laws… Imagine a world without any laws. No rules‚ no commands and in fact we only follow rules of our own. Try to think of it. Fun! Isn’t it? Now‚ imagine a world without any laws. No rules‚ no commands and just your rules to be followed. It’s also crazy isn’t it? To have a world without any laws means not only to be free but also to be in a world with chaos. For example‚ the traffic rules‚ Without any traffic rules‚ how can we determine whether
Premium Law Human Human rights
A WORLD WITHOUT LAWS WOULD BE A WORLD WITHOUT SIN According to one of the Holy Books‚ the Bible‚ when God created the first man and woman‚ He knew as the author and finisher of man that he has mind‚ a conscience which is 2-sided. It could be destructive or constructive‚ it could embrace good or shun evil‚ it could love or hate based on the outline that he knows what is wrong and or right. That was the basic reason why God warned them or gave a strict Law against the act that lead to the very first
Premium Law Plato Sin
Without the rule of law‚ anarchy would prevail. Discuss. Brónagh Buchanan. Morning Short Access. The first thing a person thinks of when they hear of anarchy is‚ Chaos‚ mayhem‚ and lawlessness. There is another side to this‚ a positive side. Revolutions‚ fighting for civil rights‚ standing up for what u believe in. In this essay I am going to discuss how this is a very flippant statement. Anarchy is not necessarily a negative thing. Law needs anarchy to exist. Humanity needs law to exist
Premium Law Management Ethics
A Life Without Rules Throughout history we constantly try to break away from society’s norm‚ in an attempt at living a fuller life. It seems as though it is almost human nature for there to be that one person to break free and really challenge the norm. Laws and their implementation determines the success of a society. So what would happen if society simply broke away from its rules and regulations and conformity was lost: orange polka-dot houses‚ no landscape maintenance ‚ and animals
Premium Maslow's hierarchy of needs Sociology Civilization
The value of structure and rules for children Tina Dillard English 101 Instructor: Linda Lyle December 17‚ 2013 When there are no rules‚ children cannot learn the appropriate way to behave. When there is no structure‚ children cannot develop security or the ability to master self-discipline. When structure and rules are present daily this tends to provides children the necessary assistance that will aid them in growing up to be responsible‚ realistic and well-behaved individuals within society
Premium Family
The rule of law is a legal maxim stating that no person is above the law‚ that no one can be punished by the state except for a breach of the law‚ and that no one can be convicted of breaching the law except in the manner set forth by the law itself. The rule of law stands in contrast to the idea that the leader is above the law‚ a feature of Roman law‚ Nazi law‚ and certain other legal systems. Albert Dicey British jurist A. V. Dicey popularised the phrase "rule of law" in 1885. Dicey emphasized
Premium Law Human rights
violations of the law by complaints from private citizens. Equality before the law was an important value in their system. Then philosopher Aristotle wrote “Now‚ absolute monarchy‚ or the arbitrary rule of a sovereign over all citizens‚ in a city which consists of equals‚ is thought by some to be quite contrary to nature;....That is why it is thought to be just that among equals everyone be ruled as well as rule‚ and therefore that all should have their turn. And the rule of law‚ it is argued‚ is
Premium Law Magna Carta
RULE OF LAW In course of Twentieth century‚ the emergences of democratic legislations and state welfare laws have lowered the effect of natural law and common law. These laws are bit liberal and sometimes puts limitations on the rule of Law in the name of nation’s Interest. This principle of ‘Rule of Law’ has been a matter of discussion and analysis since a long time in the realm of Jurisprudence and Legal theory. But‚ very less interest has been shown towards the exact definition of ‘Rule of Law’
Premium Law
extreme national emergency [the Second World War] there was one voice – eloquent and courageous – which asserted older‚ nobler‚ more enduring values: the right of the individual against the state duty to govern in accordance of law; the role of the courts as guarantor of legality and individual right‚ the priceless gift‚ subject only to constraints by law established‚ of individual freedom.”(Lord Bingham of Cornhill‚ The case of Liversidge v Anderson: the Rule of Law Amid the Clash of Arms‚2009) From
Premium Law