to reduce recidivism. Earlier the role of a federal court system was to bring together the administration and judges (Cohen and Spitzer‚ 1996). The role of a judicial official is to administer procedural justice that helps a defendant to accept accountability. The Procedural Justice Theory suggests that a person will see rulings as legitimate‚ and adopt the court’s value and goals (Wales et al.‚ 2010). O’Scannlain (2010) states the role of the federal judge is to apply the Constitution of the
Premium Law United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Ideas of social justice are both changeable and contestable. These ideas differ between individuals and societies. The term social justice is ambiguous but can briefly be summed up as - social justice involves having the capabilities to voice feelings and opinions but also for these to be heard. To do so‚ there has to be an active participation within society in order to shape it. In short‚ social justice focuses on the individual and their values and beliefs. Social harm refers to the harm
Premium Sociology Justice Political philosophy
Imperative which is the central philosophy of his theory of morality‚ and an understandable approach to this moral law. It is divided into three formulations. The first formulation of Kant’s Categorical Imperative states that one should “always act in such a way that the maxim of your action can be willed as a universal law of humanity”; an act is either right or wrong based on its ability to be universalized. This belief is part of the “universal law theory” and states that to determine if an action is
Premium Discrimination Immanuel Kant Morality
the reader: a) an understanding of the different definitions that reparative justice can adopt; and b) the functioning of the reparatory regime in the International Criminal Court (ICC) as established in the legal instruments which is based on. Reparative justice: theoretical definitions In order to create a wider scope of what reparations are or should be like and their ultimate finality‚ different reparative justice perspectives are exposed . These viewpoints comprehend various authors stemming
Premium Law Crime Criminal law
Theory of Justice Analysis Jearline Berry CJA 530 Ethics in Justice and Security January 17‚ 2010 Eddie Keon‚ Instructor Theory of Justice Analysis The Theory of Justice Analysis‚ to talk about theory of justice you need to know what crime analysis is to ensure that the current justice analysis is in place accordingly. Crime analysis is an emerging field in law enforcement; it makes it hard or difficult to determine the focus for the agencies for criminal analysis that are new to this particular
Premium Crime Criminal justice Sociology
Liberalism is an answer to the most common criticism of his Theory of Justice as Fairness where critics argued that it was just another conception of justice that is incompatible with other doctrines. It failed to clarify the concept of the good in a reasonable pluralist society by not distinguishing between an independent political theory and a comprehensive moral theory addressing the problem of Justice. This leads Rawls to refine his initial theory in Political Liberalism and ground it in a political
Premium John Rawls Political philosophy
Chapter I RAWLS THEORY OF JUSTICE 1.1) Introduction John Rawls‚ a modern and one of the most influential philosophers‚ who held the James Bryant Conant University Professorship at Harvard University and Fulbright Fellowship at Christ Church‚ Oxford‚ published several books and many articles. He wrote a series of highly influential articles in the 1950s and ’60s that helped refocus on morals and political philosophy on substantive problems. He is widely regarded as one of the most important political
Premium Political philosophy John Rawls A Theory of Justice
restorative justice has many different branches that one must understand in order to fully grasp the reasoning and objectives of restorative justice. There are many different theories that helped mold the structure and belief in the theory of restorative justice. In this paper we will discuss: - The differences between the structural theory of restorative justice and the instrumental theory of restorative justice. - The concept‚ as well as‚ the pros and cons of the power-control theory‚ and
Free Criminology Crime Sociology
The Enlightenment philosophy was a group of thinkers who stated that classical theory was the “scientific” worldview based on reason. (Bohm & Vogel‚ 2011) “The classical theory in criminal justice suggests that an individual who brakes the law does so with a rational free will‚ understanding the effects of their actions” (Schatz‚ 2017). It is believed that people are freewill and responsible for their actions; however‚ people behaviors were different; considering‚ they are believed to be motivated
Premium Crime Criminology Sociology
Plato’s theory of justice is about equality and that one deserves punishment if they do commit an unjust action. During the Crito‚ Socrates tries to correct a lot of points that Crito is trying to argue with him about‚ what it means to be justice. To be justice‚ means a human being that does good based on the laws that are emplaced according to the state. Good people according to Socrates are only worth considering. People that do good are considered moral people‚ and have opinions that should be
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy