Preview

‘Marxism Is No Longer Relevant to Our Understanding of Crime & Deviance in Society’

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1254 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
‘Marxism Is No Longer Relevant to Our Understanding of Crime & Deviance in Society’
In order to answer the question, the terms Crime & Deviance must firstly be defined. Crime is an act against the Law (robbery, murder etc), thus the act is known as illegal, whereas Deviance is an act that is not against the Law but an act seen as ‘abnormal’ and going against the norms & values o f Society, such as cross-dressing etc. Marx developed the idea of Marxism (a conflict theory between Upper and Lower social classes) in the 18th Century, when social classes were very clearly defined- the ‘Bourgeois’ and the ‘Proletariat’. For this very reason, what is known as ‘Traditional Marxism’ is now quite evidently outdated, mainly due to the emergence of the ‘Middle Class’ throughout the 20th Century and the ‘Digital Revolution’ also in the late 20th and 21st Century, which has blurred the lines between the different social classes, particularly the ‘Digital Revolution’ which has seen the birth of the Post-Modernist theory of Pick ’n’ Mix Identity, in effect allowing people to ‘choose’ their ‘Class’. Due to these reasons, Marxism has developed and produced more relevant theories. Traditional Marxism saw Crime & Deviance as a result of Capitalism and the resulting oppression and exploitation of the ‘Proletariat’, as previously stated, this itself is outdated, due to the continuing ambiguity of Social Classes. However, some aspects of Traditional Marxism still hold true to this day, such as its views on white collar crime and unfairness of the Court System and Police force. There exists much evidence (mostly provided by the ONS) that’s supports this idea of ‘unfairness’- for example the number of prosecutions for dole fraud are 14,000 annually and cost the British economy £500 Million, while tax fraud costs £5 billion to the economy, but annually there are only 20 prosecutions. It could be argued that tax fraud is much more profitable than dole fraud; however, Marxist’s would argue tax fraud is a White-Collar crime and therefore performed mostly by the upper

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In sociology, the term deviance depicts a social judgment and not a moral judgment and since a deviant behavior is one that defies the expectations of a particular community, but not necessarily immoral. As such, one community might perceive a certain behavior as a crime while other communities perceive the behavior a norm. For example, the popular culture resonates closely with deviant characters such as sociopaths and psychopaths with Hannibal and Sherlock Holmes being ideal examples, in spite of the fact that such individuals have inherent social control and manipulative skills which enable them to blend with the rest of the society, making them that much more dangerous (Hare,…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxist sociologists utilise Marxist concepts in order to provide a framework for understanding the cause and effects of crime and deviance in a capitalist society. These sociologists see power as being controlled by those who own and maintain the means of production. The superstructure of a capitalist society the agencies of social control, the law, politics as well as crime all reflect and serve ruling-class interests.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6 Study Questions

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Deviance is behavior or characteristics that violate important social norms. The difference between how the dictionary defines deviance and how sociologist define deviance is what may be deviant in one place, at one particular time, may not be deviant in another place and time. Basically with times changing something may or may not be tolerated as acceptable behavior.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One way in which Marxism is a useful theory for explaining the causes of crime is the concept of capitalism, criminogenic capitalism. Criminogenic capitalism is based on the exploitation of the working class- using them for a means to an end. Crime is not confined to the working class, greed and self interest cause white collar crimes such as tax evasion and breaches of the health and safety laws. An example to highlight this can be seen from Gordon 1988 who studied the response to the anti capitalist system and found that it is apparent that it can be found in all social classes. This analysis shows that Marxism is useful to a large extent.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess the usefulness of Marxist approaches to an understanding of crime and deviance (21 marks)…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxists theorists provide explanations how crime is dealt within society, in order to maintain the status quo. Capitalism inevitably plays a large role in this, as they divert attention of the masses away from the causes of crime and the capitalist controlled judiciary system aids capitalist society play on this, as society views young working class white/black males as criminal/deviant groups. This instills a moral panic in society when capitalist controlled journalists write cases based on where black working class youth have wronged white upper class people, i.e. cases such as mugging and assault. Society will then watch the news and read newspapers and make assumptions and stereotype all black youth they come across as bad news.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marxist sociologists argue that in order to understand crime and deviance, one needs to realise that it is the nature of exploitative economic systems that capitalist societies have in place that is primarily responsible. This is because the bourgeoisie and ruling classes oppress and exploit the working classes, which drives them into poverty. This causes a rift between the “haves” and the “have-nots” as the workers try to end exploitation whilst the owners of the means of production aim to keep the system to maintain profits. Most Marxists agree that crime is the result of poverty created through this system, for example people steal because they are materially deprived which is a result of low wages being paid by the ruling classes. This is a reason Marxists would give for the over-representation of the working classes in official crime statistics.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx was seen as an economic determinist, as he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx says that is why there was a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. Therefore, even though the Bourgeoisie were exploiting the proletariat and the proletariat could have walked away to stop being exploited, they never walked away as they needed the money. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. The reason why these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn fuelled capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a hard laboured, low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr Stefan Sledmore

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pease (1994) said, ‘Crime comprises those actions which are deemed so damaging to the interest of the community that the state determines that it must take a direct role in identifying and acting against the criminal.’ Downes and Rock (1998) said ‘Deviance may be considered as banned or controlled behaviour which is likely to attract punishment or disproval.’ In short, ‘Deviance’ is a asocial construct that can change across time and place and ‘Crime’ is an action that breaks the law.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a pleather of research regarding the issue of crime and deviance. A definition of crime and deviance can be explained in relative terms which are dependant on any particular society’s interpretation of crime and deviance. Cultures differ from one society to another and the general consensus of right and wrong can also evolve throughout time. Definitions of crime and deviance can evolve with factors such as time, pace and society. However the general definition of crime is that its an act that breaks the law and deviance refers to behaviour that most people see as differing from acceptable social norms or standards of society. The purpose of this Essay is to outline and assess what each perspectives view of crime and deviance is. The perspectives that will be in this essay are Functionalists, Interactionists and conflict theories.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime as a whole appears to be a working-class phenomenon due to selective reinforcement and mass media. Traditional Marxists argue that the state often ignores ‘white collar crimes’ such as…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Marxists crime is bound to happen in a capitalist society, and the reason behind this is because capitalism is ‘criminogenic’, meaning capitalism itself causes crime. Marxists explain that capitalism is based on the oppression of the working class; they argue that the ruling class use them as a way to make profit which is damaging on the working class. Marxists explain this causes crime as poverty may mean crime is the only way the working class can survive and crime may also be the only way they can obtain the consumer goods encouraged by capitalist advertising, resulting in theft and other utilitarian crimes. However Marxists note that not only working class people commit crime, Gordon (1976) argues that crime is a rational response to capitalism found in all social classes Capitalism is a ‘dog-eat-dog’ system of fierce competition among capitalist competing with each other for profit, encouraging them to commit white-collar crime and corporate crimes such as tax evasion. However the usefulness of this Marxist explanation of crime has been criticised as not all capitalist societies have high crime rates, for example Japan & Switzerland have a much lower crime level than the USA.…

    • 673 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ttraditional Marxists see crime as inevitable in capitalist society because it breeds poverty, ccompetition and greed. All classes commit crime, but because the ruling class control the state, they make and enforce laws in their own interests, criminalising the working class while escaping punishment for their corporate crimes. Traditional Marxism is criticised for ignoring non-class inequalities that affect crime and for determinism whereas neo-Marxism is less deterministic and sees crime as a conscious and meaningful choice with a political move- a rebellion against capitalism.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Youth Suicide in Australia

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There are types of deviant behaviour which are called delinquency. This refers to acts that are criminal, or are considered anti-social, which are committed by young people (Harambolos & Holburn, 2004, p.331). However, many deviant acts that are disapproved of are not defined as criminal. For example suicide and alcoholism are not illegal in Australia.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Deviant behavior is defined as human activity that violates social norms, (pg. 5 Schmalleger).” A number of crimes can be classified as deviant. Some people who commit deviant crimes may not see their crimes as being deviant like others would. Certain individuals consider the way others dress as being deviant if it’s not within social norms. Deviant behavior is not accepted by the general public and is seen as abnormal behavior compared to the rest of society.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays