Preview

‘Events in Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939 Played a Greater Part in Causing War in 1939 Then Did the Nazi Soviet Pact.’ How Far Do You Agree? Explain Your Answer.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
‘Events in Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939 Played a Greater Part in Causing War in 1939 Then Did the Nazi Soviet Pact.’ How Far Do You Agree? Explain Your Answer.
‘Events in Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939 played a greater part in causing war in 1939 then did the Nazi soviet pact.’ How far do you agree? Explain your answer.

Ultimately, the events in Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939 played a major role in contributing to the outbreak of world war 2 as it ended the appeasement policy and led to Britain’s realization that war was the only solution. However, the nazi soviet pact is also a factor as it gave germany the confidence to invade Poland, a move that guaranteed war. After the anschluss, Czechoslovakia was next on hitler’s list of expansion. The Czech government felt threatened, and sought support from Britain and france should Hitler invade Czechoslovakia, and both Britain and france felt bound to help them. On 15 september 1938, Hitler told chamberlain that he would risk war to bring the Sudeten germans into germany. Chamberlain found his demands reasonable, and decided that areas in which more than half the population was germans should be handed over to Hitler. However on 22 sep Hitler stepped his demands and asked for the whole of Sudetenland. Originally, chamberlain rejected his demands. Eventually, in an attempt to avoid war, he, along with Mussolini and the prime minister of france decided that Sudetenland would be given to germany. This was known as the munich agreement (29 sep). Czechoslovakia was not consulted, and it had felt betrayed. Following that, Hitler then assured chamberlain that he had no further claims in Europe. However, in march 1939, Hitler took over the rest of Czechoslovakia, showing that he could not be trusted. Following that, Britain and france both abandoned the appeasement policy and announced that it would declare war on germany in event that Hitler invaded Poland. However, the nazi soviet pact was also an extremely important factor as it enabled Hitler to avoid a two frontwar, and allowed him to continue to provoke the western countries as stalin now secured his eastern

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Through the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939, Stalin was advancing his own hostile outside arrangement in eastern Europe by making 'mystery conventions' inside the agreement with Germany, utilizing those conventions to progress into free Finland, Estonia, Latvia and other Baltic States and effectively supporting Germany in the war with the Western forces to meet his own particular…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within Europe leading up to World War II, the Nazis and Soviets made the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression pacts which negligible of the pact it seems inevitable that the war would have existed as there were many other major factors that provoked the war in Europe. These factors include the unresolved issues of World War One, with the Treaty of Versailles being the main one, Hitler’s actions, one of these being the invasion of Poland, the failure of appeasement and the failure of the League of Nations. With these major factors the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact was only a minor factor in the war in Europe and so without it the war would have still broke out.…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He also points out that his policy served to repair the damage caused by the Treaty of Versailles. Chamberlain further states: “Really I have no need to defend my visits to Germany last autumn, for what was the alternative? Nothing that we could have done, nothing that France could have done, or Russia could have done could possibly have saved Czecho-Slovakia from invasion and destruction.” There existed no other solution to German aggression against Czechoslovakia. With the Munich Agreement signed, Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. On the other hand, without an Agreement, it still would have been likely that Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. Thus, Chamberlain remains blameless for German aggression because the German Empire would have invaded Czechoslovakia in either case. After establishing his innocence, Chamberlain states the inevitability of war against the German Empire: “Does not the question inevitably arise in our minds, if it is so easy to discover good reasons for ignoring assurances so solemnly and so repeatedly given, what reliance can be placed upon any other assurances that come from the same source?” How can any of the European powers trust the German Empire after the Munich Agreement was so abruptly ripped up? Any further peace talks will not produce satisfying results because there will always be doubt regarding the German intent to expand its territory. Chamberlain…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 19

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1939 the world was plunged into World War II because of the Munich Agreement. The Munich Agreement was an agreement regarding the Sudetenland Crisis between the major powers of Europe after a conference held in Munich in Germany in 1938. The Sudetenland was an important region of Czechoslovakia. The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty created as a result of six months of negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which put an official end to World War I between the Allies and Central Powers. The Munich Agreement caused many disagreements between European countries. Collective security was a more effective response to aggression than appeasement because more European countries disagreed than agreed with the decision made during the Munich Conference for various reasons and Germany had many ways of keeping its territories under control.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ world war 2

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Actions were taken that moved Europe toward war. The debate over the causes of World War II provides…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    18.1) Assess the view that the disagreements about the Second Front were the most significant cause of tension between Russian and the West between 1941 and 1945.…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin's effects on WW2

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On August 23rd of 1939, Soviet Union ruler Joseph Stalin agreed to sign a non-aggression, or neutrality pact with Adolf Hiter, this prove to have a huge influence on the decisions of the Germans. Part of the non-agression pact was that the Soviets would not come to aid Poland if it was attacked, Stalin agreed. This non-agression pact insured Germany that it would not be fighting on two fronts in the coming war, for signing this pact the Soviet Union was given land that included part of Poland and some Baltic States[1]. Just a couple days before the non-agression pact was signed, Vyacheslav Molotov, the Chairman of the Council of People's in the Soviet Union made an economic agreement with the Germans, agreeing to provide food products and raw materials to Germany in exchange for machinery from Germany, this in combination with the non-agression pact helped Germany bypass the British blockade. These pacts were supposed to last ten years, they only lasted two.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that in order for the Nazi Regime to have stayed in power, it was essential that they maintain high popularity. On the other hand, though popularity is needed, it can be debated that the use of terror was a more important aspect to the regime as it ensured that the German people would not question or speak out against the regimes policy and actions. The view in source four appears to provide the view that the regime was dependant on its popularity and also agrees with the statement provided. However, if you were to compare this with source five then you would see that it gives the impression that the regime depended solely on terror, thus disagreeing with the statement. Furthermore, it would appear that source six provides a balanced view on the subject and to some extent supports both source four and five. It can therefore be debated as to whether or not the Nazi Regime depended more on its broad popularity than on terror in the years 1933-1939.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles has been said to be the most important, indirect cause of WWII. After Germany was defeated in World War I, they were forced via the Treaty to pay heavy reparations to the victors. Their economy could not take the pressure from the harsh reparations and it quickly fell…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Additionally, everyone thought that Hitler wanted peace and nothing more than that because of the speeches that he gave to the public. Hitler true motives were started to show in the speeches that he delivered. At the start of 1937, he assured all Germans that Germany was running out of space because they were getting over populated and they needed to expand Germany. Acording to History.com “ On September 30, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, French Premier Edouard Daladier, and British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain signed the Munich Pact, which sealed the fate of Czechoslovakia, virtually handing it over to Germany in the name of peace.” The Munich Pact was signed because Hitler believed that most of the people in the border of Czechoslovakia are…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes of World War II

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two causes of World War II were the harsh provisions of the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War I and the rise of nationalist leader Adolf Hitler.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremiah

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The main causes of World War II were nationalistic tensions, unresolved issues, and resentments resulting from the World War I and the interwar period in Europe, plus the effects of the Great Depression in the 1930s.The culmination of events that led to the outbreak of war are generally understood to be the 1939 invasion of Poland by Germany and Soviet Russia and the 1937 invasion of the Republic of China by the Empire of Japan. These military aggressions were the result of decisions made by the authoritarian ruling Nazi elite in Germany and by the leadership of the Kwantung Army in Japan. World War II started after these aggressive actions were met with an official declaration of war and/or armed resistance.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Timeline of Holocaust

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Munich Conference: Great Britain and France agree to German occupation of the Sudetenland, previously western Czechoslovakia.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler demanded Danzig be given back to Germany so Britain offered protection to Poland. Britain and France realized their only hope was the Soviet Union. They were facing a German invasion much like other countries had previously. Hitler had promised a Thousand-Year Reign to his empire. However, Hitler got to them first and developed a pact with the Soviet Union. World War II began in 1939 with the German invasion of Poland. Two days later Britain and France retaliated and declared war on Hitler’s Nazi states (Duiker & Spielvogel,…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stuff and things

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After WW I Europe was in ruins and new countries started to form. Some of these new counties were formed right out of German territory but later would fail due to the lack of collective security. These countries were named Rhineland and Czechoslovakia. Both countries played an important role on keeping a buffer between France and Poland. These countries had an alliance with the Allies and were also allies with the League of Nations. Even though Hitler was raising an army, the League of Nations did nothing to stop him. When Hitler was satisfied with his new army, he decided to start his plan for lebensraum. He had conquered Rhineland in a short amount of time. However Czechoslovakia started to worry and asked for the League of Nations help. The outcome was really poor since the League of Nations did nothing to help Czechoslovakia. Many Czechoslovakians were angry such as radio broadcaster William Shirer. William Shirer said that “It took the Big Four just five hours and twenty-five minutes here in Munich today to dispel the clouds of war and come to an agreement over the partition of Czechoslovakia” (document 4). Also George F. Kennan of Russia offers his view of the Munich agreement. George said that “The Munich Agreement was a…. desperate act of appeasement at the cost of the Czechoslovak state performed by Chamberlin and French premier,…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays