Preview

Why the Antifederalists Were Opposed to Ratifying the Constitution Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
791 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the Antifederalists Were Opposed to Ratifying the Constitution Essay Example
Why Were the Anti-Federalists Opposed to Ratifying the Constitution? In 1788, the ratification process began for the Constitution. Previously, in 1787, the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia drafted the document. It was signed by forty-two of the original fifty-five delegates at the convention. The remaining members refused to sign and returned to their states to stand firm against ratification. Those who did not agree with the ratification of the Constitution were known as anti-federalists. Those who wanted it ratified were federalists. The anti-federalists were against the Constitution because it did not contain a Bill of Rights, they believed it created a centralized government with too much power, and that big states would dominate small states. One of the most popular arguments against the Constitution was that there was an absence of a Bill of Rights. The basic rights of all citizens were not listed in the Constitution. Anti-federalists feared that government would become too powerful and would abuse their power if the rights of the people were not clearly stated in the Constitution. They also thought that the absence of a list of rights went against the initial believes held by Americans during the Revolution. During the Revolutionary War, basic freedoms such as freedom of speech, the press, and religion were important to most Americans who fought. Anti-federalists saw not having these freedoms protected in our government as disregarding all America had worked for. Anti-federalists demanded a Bill of Rights, and they were not going to consider ratification until an agreement was made between them and the federalists. The anti-federalists also believed that the Constitution made government too strong. Under the Constitution, the government could levy taxes, raise an army, and control trade and commerce. This took away a lot of the power that the individual states had had under the Articles of Confederation. Anti-federalists also believed that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way Anti-Federalists saw the fate of the states was that the general government outlined in the proposed Constitution would swallow up the states, reducing them to administrative districts at best, and thus destroying the people's liberties and right of self-government. The Federalists, citing the history of government under the Confederation, insisted that the possibility was that the states would continue to infringe on the…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was being written and ratified, there were two main political factions, each having ideas that were vastly diverse from each other. While Thomas Jefferson was an anti-Federalist, many of the other Constitution makers were Federalists. John Adams, a Federalist, was elected as the second American president in 1796 and served in office until 1800.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Anti federalist was more convincing because, Anti-Federalists fight that the Constitution gave lot more ability to the federal government, although speaking too much control away from state and local governments. Many perceive that the federal government would be too long removed to represent the ordinary citizen. Anti-Federalists scared that the nation was too large for the national government to answer to the anxieties of people on a state and local basis. The Anti-Federalists were also feared that the real text of the Constitution did not consist of a bill of rights.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists and anti-federalists had a very intense debate during the ratification of the constitution. Both sides had to make several compromises in order to be able to do something better for the people. I myself agree more with the views of the anti-federalists. They believed that the power should be shared by the states in order for things to be fair. If the Federal government had all the power, chaos would rule our way of life. The individual rights and shared power is what makes things flow smooth in our government.…

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A collection of essays called, The Federalist, were published in 1787 and 1788 and basically supported the ratification of the constitution and the idea of a national authority without the fear of tyranny in the new government. The anti-federalists responded to this with what they considered to be the dangers of a more powerful central government.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and believed that it gave the federal government too much power, while taking away the power of the individual states. They also wanted a bill of rights to guarantee certain liberties, which the Constitution did not have at the time. They also thought the federal government created would not represent the normal citizen very well. In addition, they argued that as a federal government,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists v. Anti-Federalists The Federalists; John Day, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and James Madison, were supporters of the constitution. They believed that our nation needed a strong federal government. The reasoning behind their belief was because they found it was necessary that a strong federal government be made for the entire country. As said in the Federalist Paper number it mentions the idea of checks and balances which would prevent one branch from growing too strong and it would limit the governments power.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many antifederalists did not want the government to have so much control over America. Amending the articles would require the confirmation of every state legislature. Unlike the king of Britain, the antifederalists were against one person ruling America and so they refused to appoint one single president under the Articles of Confederation. This created a weakness in the government. Under the Articles, the individual states would be represented by one to seven delegates with each state holding only one vote in Congress. The Articles gave the individual states more power than the federal government. When Congress needed money, it would have to ask the individual states to contribute money to the federal government. This complicated the government and made it extremely inefficient. Additionally, all of the judicial power would be given to the states. Regulation of commerce would be regulated by treaties that would hold no check on conflicting state regulations. The Articles of Confederation essentially gave much more power and control to individual states than to the federal…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti-Federalist were opponents of the Constitution who saw it as a limitation to both state and human rights. “Anti-Federalists repeatedly predicted that the new government would fall under the sway of merchants, creditors, and others hostile to the interests of ordinary Americans” (Foner 272). But they lacked the leadership of the Constitution’s defender. Fearful that their influence would have diminished, there were some state politicians that were involved with the Anti-Federalists which were the “revolutionary heroes as Samuel Adams, John Hancock, and Patrick Henry” (Foner 272). Liberty was the Anti-Federalist’s watchword and they felt that it was being threatened by the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists pointed out that the Constitution…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    was the Anti-Federalists. They of course were opposed to the Federalists on how they viewed how the government should be conducted. These men, Mercy Otis Warren, Richard Henry Lee, Samuel Adams, among many others, drafted their own works which made up the Anti-Federalists papers. The Anti-Federalists party was based on the fact that the central government should not be very strong and that more power should reside to the states. Their main cause of this thinking was because they believed that if the country gave too much power to the federal government, it would become too powerful and they would end up where they started before the Revolutionary War, the government in control of everything and the people not having a say about any of it. The main reason the Anti-Federalists were tolerant of the passing of the Constitution was because they were able to have a bill of rights put into…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The anti-federalists were in favor of protecting the people with a Bill of Rights, whereas the federalists thought it was dangerous and would backfire on the country. Individual rights are not absolute because if they were, any person could do whatever they wanted which could possibly lead to complete and total anarchy. The Constitution protects these rights, but also limits them by creating laws that diminish terrible behavior. I am writing this email to you because several problems have come up in my community which I am very worried…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Anti Federalists

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anti Federalists wanted our government to remain the same; a monarchy. This would cause distrust in the government because of the possible corruption. Federalists felt we should have a central government. They preferred a government with three branches. I feel they cared more about the feelings of the people. Which is why I have sided with the federalist.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays