Preview

Week 3- Legal, Political, Ethics Dim of Business Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
632 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Week 3- Legal, Political, Ethics Dim of Business Essay Example
1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points)
Free speech
2. What court decided the case in the assignment? (2 points)
Supreme Court
3. Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)
The plaintiff and several other bridal photographs were published in a newspaper. The radio show decided to have an “Ugliest Bride” contest and made some derogatory comments about the plaintiff and her appearance. The radio show allowed the public to call and make comments about her as well. In addition, they release her full name and other personal information, which was heard by her and her co-workers. The plaintiff proceeded to try to sue the radio show broadcaster for intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation of character.
4. According to the case, why was this not defamation, and what tort did the court approve a filing for? (5 points)
The court determined this was not defamation because the comments made were the broadcaster’s opinion. The court approved filing for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
5. In the decision, why does the court state further proceedings will be required? (5 points)
The court confirmed the plaintiff can proceed to pursue a lawsuit.
6. Do you agree with this decision? Why or why not? (5 points)
Yes, I agree with the decision made in this case. The plaintiff’s name and other personal identifiable information was released to the public as they proceeded to degrade her. She listened to these negative comments made while with her co-workers and was embarrassed. The broadcaster does have a right to his opinion and freedom of speech, but it doesn’t have to be announced to the world. The 1st Amendment does protect freedom of speech with a list of provisions and exceptions to the rule.

a. the name and citation of the case (5 points)
B-S Industrial Contractors, Inc., Respondent, v.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Hopkins, W. Wat. Actual Malice: Twenty-Five Years After Times v. Sullivan. New York: Praeger, 1989…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WIRETIME has committed an intentional business related tort known as Defamation. In this case all four elements of defamation are present. A defamatory statement was made, it was spread to a third party, the statement was very definite to one company, and it caused damages to BUGusa business.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first rule applied in this case was the rule of libel and slander, which states that the cause of defamation must include four elements: “1) a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff; 2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; 3) fault by the defendant amounting at least to negligence; and 4) special harm of the actionability of the statement irrespective of special harm.” (822) Libel is the defamation of one’s character in written form, and slander is the…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case we received was Ed Franklin, a former teacher at public and private schools in Minersville, pled guilty to state criminal charges of sexually molesting several of his former students. One of Franklin's victims was invited to appear at Franklin’s sentencing hearing in order to testify about the impact of the molestation. While the hearing was open to the press and public, the judge ordered the reporters present not to identify any of the sexual assault victims in press accounts of the sentencing. None of the reporters present at the hearing raised any objection to the judge’s order. Despite the order, a reporter for the American Press news syndicate included the victim’s name in coverage of the hearing.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issues: Did Ms. Akre’s claims meet the whistle-blower statue? Was the “news distortion policy” adopted as rule by the FCC?…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has a fairness doctrine requiring all radio and television broadcasters to present public issues over the airwaves in a civil and balanced way. The fairness doctrine is composed of two main requirements related to personal attacks in the context of public issue debates and political editorializing. The political editorializing rule requires that when a broadcaster endorses or opposes a political candidate, they must notify the opposed candidate and give them reasonable opportunity…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case was dismissed due to the state of New York not having a common-law claim for invasion of privacy. Also, the plaintiff’s claim for violation of civil rights law 50 and 51 was dismissed because the plaintiff’s name and likeness was not up for trade or being advertised. The claim for defamation was dismissed because the statement “flagrant opportunist” was the opinion of the defendant.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The plaintiff Sullivan, Commissioner of Public Affairs in Alabama believed he was defamed by an article printed out in the New York Times pertaining to the tragedy that was aimed toward those who took part in the civil rights movement at a college in Alabama. The article stated how African Americans were punished by the police for things they had the right to, like peacefully protesting for the right to vote. Although the article didn’t directly mention Sullivan’s name, he felt it was referred to him because he was responsible for the police. Sullivan requested the article be moved based on the false information…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The passage above also discusses one court case. Who were the parties involved in the case?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mrs. Esposito’s bridal photo was published in a newspaper alongside other brides. The SFX radio station disc jockey’s, during one of their aired segments called “The ugliest bride contest” discussed Esposito’s photo commenting on how she looked and other factors that would qualify her for the winner of the “ugliest bride.” The radio also opened the floors for other to vote on the photos as well. The disc jockeys announced Esposito’s full name over the radio and her superiors’ names. Esposito heard the comments along with her coworkers. Esposito sought out for emotional distress and was deemed to receive compensation. SFX then appealed the decision where they lost again.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the media says things that decimate the character of a person or business, They are at risk of being sued. Broadcasts and Publications have to pay close attention to the wording so that it is just plain facts and make sure that what they are saying is completely true.…

    • 966 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Media Study Guide

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Explain the key elements of New York Times v. Sullivan (1964). What were the legal issues involved, and what was the U.S. Supreme Court’s rationale for its ruling? As a result, what does a public official have to establish in order to win a libel suit?…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hillsborough Disaster

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Defamation law has been most pronounced in the British media industry. While it has influences the media both in a positive and negative ways, journalists are now more cautious about what they write. On the other hand, celebrities and other public personalities are now very concerned of what is being written about them. For Instance, Geoldof Peaches sued the Daily Star tabloid for damages after the paper alleged that she practiced prostitution at night. Geldoff complained to Press Complain Commission about the allegations that had a potential of damaging her colourful career. The Daily Star publishers on their part agreed that their story on Geldof lacked accuracy and was damaging to her reputation[3].…

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Paper

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Balter-Reitz, S. (2003). Free Speech on Trial: Communication Perspectives on Landmark Supreme Court Decisions. Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Authority

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case was heard by three lower courts before it reached the United States Supreme Court. List those three courts in order, beginning with the court that has the most authority and ending with the court that has the least amount of authority.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays