Preview

U.S. Criminal Justice System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1020 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
U.S. Criminal Justice System
U.S. Criminal Justice System

HSIN-CHIEH LIN BLACK STUDIES 100 JANUARY 13, 1997

In order to keep a safe society, it is important to establish a nation with good education to teach people judging from right or wrong , excellent police force to keep our street safe, and most of all, a good criminal justice system to carry out the justice. United States is a place with little crimes, a nation with nice houses, beautiful beaches, and expensive shops without property just like what I seen in the American movies in my opinion before I arrived here. The very moment I stood in my dream street, Hollywood boulevard, I was shocked at the scenario. I then realized that this is a place no different from other countries The United States has many problems too, especially in crimes and its criminal justice system.

The major feature of the U.S. criminal justice system is the jury system which is found nowhere else in the world except here in the America. The jury system originally was designed such that a decision of whether a person is guilty or innocent will not fall only into one individual's hand but a group of people. This feature gives the U.S. criminal justice system a lot of strength in a way that in order for 10 people to agree on a person being guilty or not, the court must supply sufficient amount of evidence so that no one will be punished by mistake. Moreover, since the jury selection is done so secretly and strict that it is not possible to judge any one in court in the favor of any side, it is the decision of the jurors who were selected from regular citizens to find any guilty or innocent. However, the major weakness of the jury system is that will the defendant get the fair trial if jurors are being prejudice. As I observe several years in the United States, racism do still exist in the United
States unlike what I though before coming here. It is impossible to get a fair trial for African Americans who is being trial in a white

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ADJ Midterm

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    which consisted of eight men and four women, before they deliberated the verdict. From what…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Koror Jail Rehabilitation

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    respect and how to get there lives in order and lower the recidivism rate. This too is…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cja Courtsystems

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    | |and whose official duty is to conduct criminal |before they even know if they are taking a case. The |…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The initial conflict of the men was that not all of them voted that the victim was guilty, one person did not agree.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminals are tried in our court system everyday for crimes they are accused of committing. In these court cases, witnesses are called to give an account of what happened in the particular incident and then a jury of twelve members decides the criminal's ruling on the case. The jury does not listen to just one witness; it takes into account the stories of many witnesses in order to decipher the truth. "The Story of an Hour" by Kate Chopin and "Richard Cory" by Edwin Arlington Robinson show one cannot fully rely on what other people say in certain situations.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    or parties their innocents they must prove the guilty is guilty. Prosecutors can do this by…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These two objectives are important because they ensure a safe community and a fair trial for all. The courts and the police work together to investigate a crime and apprehend the offender while at the same time ensuring that the accused has their due process. These two objectives can collide when the police want to get an offender off the streets and control crime by charging them even though there is not enough evidence for the court to fully convict. The police choose to control crime by removing an offender from the street and into the system even if it is only for a limited time. On the other hand the courts wish that they didn’t have to shift hopeless cases and get to series ones where a criminal has the potential of a conviction. The true way for these two components to work effectively together is to ensure a thru investigation of every…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus with these situations of the judge instructing the jury to choose a verdict, there would need…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most countries in the world today do not use juries, and only a small percentage of cases in the United States are decided by juries. So why exactly do Americans have juries? What role do they play in our system? And does it make sense for modern America?…

    • 588 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ountries that have never had a jury system, or have had one in the past, have turned to citizens to decide criminal cases. The jury system could be helpful, but it can also be a huge problem in a serious case. A Jury is a group of citizens which hears the testimony in legal disputes and determines what it believes is the truth. Jury trials should remain an option. Without Juries in my opinion it would be totally unfair to go off of what one person thinks. There are 3 main reasons why the jury system should remain an option.…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the United States, our court system is operated by a dual court system. The two types that make up the dual court system are federal and state. The dual court system is advantageous and desirable because it parallels federalism, a system of government where power is constitutionally divided between a central governing body and various constituent units (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, p. 5, 2011). The federal courts deal with cases of a broader degree, while the states courts deal with cases involving crimes within their own state borders. Even though England was the original founders, our nation was in desperate need of changes within the criminal justice…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie, “12 Angry Men” there were 12 men who were deciding whether this guy was guilty or not and 11 of them chose guilty and only one chose not guilty. Then the guy who chose not guilty started giving examples on why the guy wasn’t guilty, although he may be wrong he still made points that were very justable and convince the other 11 men to change their vote to not guilty one by one. At the end he convinced all the 11 men to vote for not guilty and the guy on trail was free. From this I learned that if I have enough proof and am smart enough I can convince anyone to change their mind about something.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film “12 Angry Men” is a 1957 drama consisting of a dozen men on jury, who attempt to reach a verdict involving a teenager in a murder case. A guilty verdict was initially predicted, but the jury members start questioning and reasoning the testimonies given in court. Was the boy being accused of stabbing his father really guilty? All the information regarding the timing of the train, the timing of the murder, and the testimonies did not add up. Through much debate, a complex voting process, and many concepts learned through SCOM, the jury managed to attain a not-guilty ruling due to the inadequate testimonies and facts gathered.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fonda, the one man who voted ‘not guilty,’ remains consistent with his original vote and continues to present facts to the group in hopes of changing their minds. After the group takes additional votes using ballots, more men slowly begin to change their vote. It is apparent that the men are now realizing that they will not be the odd man out if they decide to vote ‘not guilty’, because others are doing it too…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The movie “Twelve Angry Men” opens up with a sequence which justifies the above stated quote. The storyline follows the story of two random people chosen as jurors who have been asked to give a verdict on a murder case. The case involves the murder of a father by his teenage son. The verdict can be held legal and valid only if it is unanimous. At the start of the movie, everyone except a gentleman votes as ‘guilty’ for the boy. The gentleman expresses his desire to go over all the facts after which he would make his decision whether the teenager is guilty or not. After several deliberations, re-questioning of the stated facts and witness testimonials, slowly the jurors start changing their verdict from ‘guilty’ to ‘not-guilty’. The story ends with the unanimous verdict in the favor of the teenager.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays