Preview

Short Response to DeCartes' Meditation II

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
321 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Short Response to DeCartes' Meditation II
Cogito comes from the Latin phrase "Cogito ergo sum" which means "I think, therefore I am." I came up with this formula from DeCartes statement on Meditation II, Doubting=Existence, Doubting=Thinking, Thinking=Existing, Doubt=Existence. Doubting serves as double purpose: to eliminate false beliefs and a mechanism to discover the truth. Although some some philosopher thinks that Cognito is flawed since what will happen if we stop thinking, I think he was misunderstood because existence in human form is, at least in my opinion, means you thought for even for just a moment. I can say that when I do not think about who am I, who I want to become, what I like, what I dislike, etc, I can personally state that I don't know what am I made of nor the reality of myself. Say I am being self-critical, yet I do feel I am valuable when I know myself, I think, I give opinions, and I care about stuff.

I think DeCartes in a way is perfectionist that he does not want to come always sum up to conclusion but rather he formulated the Cartesian method where: first is to start with an empty mind, second is to divide the problem, third is to reflect upon the problem (combine the divided the problem and also proceed from simple to complex), fourth is to repeat the procedure again and again to make sure no errors are made. When you think, analyze, formulate, create hypothesis, create a solution... Often times great results, perhaps great truth, is revealed. Of course, not all the time there is one final answer to everything. It's inevitable for a lot of people to seek for divine intervention and DeCartes, after all his doubts and meditation, still ended up believing in God as the master planner. Also, in Meditation V, he stated that science and religion are not necessarily contradictory but rather maybe complimentary entities.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Descartes struggled to trust his senses and believed that God or an evil demon could deceive him. Despite the questionable realities in each text, Meditations on First Philosophy differs from The Allegory of the Cave and The Matrix in that Descartes begins and ends in the same true reality and comes to the conclusion that he is certain of his own existence. Descartes also ascertains that God exists as a perfect being and would not deceive him. In The Allegory of the Cave and The Matrix, the main characters move from false realities into what the authors of each text portray as true…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Decisions are made without thought. This could cause stress to build and affect the way people deal with life. Everyone needs to stop and take a few minutes to calm down. So if life is stressing you out, it’s time to slow down. Meditation can help relieve stress and worries. The practice of meditation is a way to be still for a while and let our minds become focused until we become calm enough to deal with the daily pressures of life.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Other than the Cogito stating ‘so long as I continue to think I am something,’ which was determined to be a first principle in the First Meditations, another self-evident truth arises in the beginning of the Third Meditation that is a crucial antecedent for Descartes’ belief system regarding the existence of God. This first principle explicitly states that everything Descartes’ thinking being clearly and distinctly perceives is true. A few other important claims are made in the Third Mediation that are especially relevant to the Fifth Mediations, such as the claim that ideas considered alone in their own right cannot be outwardly false. Accounting for intuitive error, Descartes elaborates that even though ideas might have proceeded from things outside him, it does not follow that these ideas must resemble those outside things. An idea for a substance however, or something that exists in itself, has a greater objective reality than ideas without a substance, because it is more clear and distinct. It is from this foundation that Descartes’ idea of God is defined as, “a certain substance that is infinite, independent, supremely intelligent and supremely powerful.”…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Cogito ergo Sum”( ….) . This conditional statement translates to “ I think, therefore, I am” and he presents that his ability to have consciences confirms his existence. After doubting God Descartes proves his existence in his Meditations on First Philosophy, he affirms the existence of God with an ontological view. This view suggests that the ability of one to think…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes, a French philosopher attempted to craft groundwork to establish further scientific developments. He rationed that once one knows the foundations of a belief and one builds upon that, much of what one believes can be doubted. He held that through using math’s methods, he could apply these same methodologies to other ideas. Descartes believed that nothing can be perceived more easily and evidently than his own mind. By applying his theory, that he knew nothing for certain but was aware of his own thought, he started to combat already instituted ideas and conjured up the existence of…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes talked about the true and the false, and how we make mistakes in Meditation Four. Descartes believed that error as such is not something real that depends upon God, but rather is merely a defect. And thus there is no need to account for my errors by positing a faculty given to me by God for this purpose(546). He thought that the reason why we make mistakes is that the faculty of judging the truth, which we got from God, is not infinite(546). When Descartes focused more closely on more closely on himself and inquired into the nature of his errors, he noted that errors depend on the simultaneous concurrence of two causes: intellect and will(547). He didn’t believe that God ought to have given us a greater faculty of knowing than he did(547). So we cannot make no mistakes like God. Then Descartes raised a question that can he complain that the will or free choice he have received from God is insufficiently ample or perfect(547). After using paragraphs talking about it, Descartes perceived that the power of willing is not the cause of his errors, for it is most ample as well as perfect in its kind(548). This idea is similar to Augustine’s ides in On Free Choice of the Will. Then he thought if he held off from making a judgment when he do not perceive what is true with sufficient clarity and distinctness, it is cleat that he was acting properly and not committing an error(548). In the end, he said he would indeed attain it if only he paid enough attention to all the things that he perfectly understand, and separate them off from the rest, which he apprehended more confusedly and more obscurely(549).…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rene Descartes begins Meditations on First Philosophy by explaining his basic purpose and how he plans on going about accomplishing this project. Descartes hopes to discover truth and justify human knowledge and belief. In order to find the fundamental truths of life, Descartes believes he must start from scratch so that he may discern truth from false beliefs. All of Descartes' beliefs, everything he has learned and grown to believe is now cast under the shadow of doubt, as he explains to us, "I will attack straightaway those principles which supported everything I once believed" (14). Descartes further explains the task which he faced as he says, "I had to raze everything to the ground and begin again from the original foundations, if I wanted to establish anything firm and lasting in the sciences" (13).…

    • 2451 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “he for whom this bell tolls may be so ill, as that he knows not it tolls for him; and perchance I may think myself so much better than I am, as that they who are about me, and see my state, may have caused it to toll for me, and I know not that.”-Donne on the subject of his sickness.…

    • 786 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes vs Hume

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    René Descartes realized that many of the things that he have accepted as the truth was false opinions, and consequentially the principles that were built upon them. He wanted to start anew by try to find out “the truth”, and then build upon that, because the foundation of science requires absolute certainty. In his attempt to find “the truth,” he started to criticize all of the things he had formally believed: applying the method of doubts, and then remove from the foundation what he found to be doubtable or deducible. He did this as he believed as his doubt increase, certainty decrease and vice versa. By the end of Meditation I, he was in a state called “Abyss,” where he was skeptical of all things and decided that the empirical world was presented to him by an evil demon He then reasoned that for him to be deceived by the demon, he must exist as something, a mind or a thinking thing…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Meditation one, Descartes initially writes about a blanket of ignorance that he feels he’s been trapped under for his entire life up until this point. He says “I had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true.” With this statement, Descartes decides to do a spring cleaning of sorts of all his beliefs that he has reason to doubt. He makes a point to mention though, that not all of his beliefs are false or able to be refuted.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes begins his first meditation by calling all our current beliefs to suspicion. His purpose of this practice was to stripe away all the falsehoods that we have acquired since childhood by the use of our senses. He also wanted to build anew a stable foundation of beliefs that he can be certain are of undeniably truths.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes’ first meditation, his main objective is to present three skeptical arguments to bring doubt upon what he considers his basic beliefs. Descartes believes this to be an intricate part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes skeptical arguments are not intended to be a denial of his basic beliefs. On the contrary, he uses these arguments to help prove one of his main theses, which is the existence of God. One of the main premises that Descartes uses in his proof for the existence of God comes from the evil demon argument, which he proposed, in the first meditation. It is this evil demon argument, which will be the topic of the following discussion.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy of I, Robot

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “I think there I am” is a famous quote used by Descartes which basically tell us if we are thinking then we are alive. He further state that our senses can deceive us so what we need to do is focus on the mind, which he stated when he said “All that I have, up to this moment, accepted as possessed of the highest truth and certainty, I received either from or through the senses. I observed, however, that these sometimes misled us; and it is the part of prudence not to place absolute confidence in that by which we have even once been deceived.” We often make more judgements on perception than we make perceptions in life even in our moment of sleep. When we are sleeping we tend to dream of things which represent to ourselves in the same situation or circumstances, or even sometimes others less probable, which the insane things are presented to us in our waking moments. This is clearly stated when Descartes “I perceive so clearly that there exist no certain marks by which the state of waking can ever be distinguished from sleep, that I feel greatly astonished; and in amazement I almost persuade myself that I am now dreaming.” The mind is where we experience the universe so we need to have close distinct ideas, whether we make an accurate or false judgement it is that if the mind. Even though our bodies play a major part in what we do along with the mind, hence dualism, Descartes stated that if we are stripped from everything we can still think, therefore gives great meaning to the term “I think therefore I am”.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes' Meditations

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “I think, therefore I am” is the popular saying that comes from Descartes. What Descartes means by this is that…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I think, I am.” This is the premise that all of Rene Descartes’ beliefs and ideas are based off of. He believes these four words are the foundation for his existence and what he suggest all truth stems from. Descartes believes that the only thing he knows for certain is that he is a thing and that he thinks. He does not even accept his own body or the tangible world as he feels that these may very well be illusions. Descartes would attempt to better understand this theory by spending long hours in solitude. I will argue Rene Descartes’ attempts to isolate himself at times in order to think freely and examine his individual being proves that his beliefs directly correspond to the modern Western philosophy of this time period.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays