Preview

Sectional Conflics in Early America Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
820 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sectional Conflics in Early America Essay Example
The sectional conflicts within the United States affected numerous domestic polices and even caused, in part, Andrew Jackson's election. Andrew Jackson's election was greatly affected by sectional differences because he represented only a portion of the United States, yet it was the portion with a majority of Electoral College votes. The sectional differences of the United States caused a protective tariff to be levied. The Missouri compromise was also affected by the differences between various differences between the divisions of the United States. Even Texas was affected by the sectional differences of the United States. The political divisions of the United States greatly affected politics between the years of 1828-1837. Andrew Jackson's election was caused, in part, by the sectional differences between the north and the west and south. Andrew Jackson was representative of the west and south in his virtues and views on national policy prior to entering office. He was for no tariffs and states rights in general. This meant that the majority of southern and western states supported him and allowed him to win a majority vote in the Electoral College. While his election was effected by sectional differences, his policies were not so much affected because of a rapid turn around to a federalist look of government and supporting the north in most every aspect. Andrew Jackson's election, if not presidency, was greatly affected by sectional divisions. The Tariffs of this era are perhaps the most easily related to sectional differences. Tariffs had always been fought by the south. The south viewed tariffs as a way to tax the south because they would tax the south's imports and exports whereas little or nothing would be taxed in the north. This meant that there was an ongoing war in Congress of the sectional differences. The tariff of abominations was the boiling point for many southerners which resulted in South Carolina causing another

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Antebellum Period Essay

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What forces or ideas motivated and inspired this effort to remake and reform American society during the Antebellum years?…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The northern states loved Adams because he favored elites and their manufacturing industries. The south and west favored Jackson because he believed in equal opportunity for any citizen of the United States of America. Two states, Maryland…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    US1 DBQ

    • 298 Words
    • 1 Page

    In 19th century America during the time period of 1815 to 1858, there were two major groups openly in opposition with one another. These two forces were Nationalism, and Sectionalism. Sectionalism, or the excessive devotion to local interests, and nationalism, or the devotion and loyalty to ones country. Although the two were different and directly contrasted each other, both nationalism and sectionalism impacted the United States. The documents mentioned prove that sectionalism tears and shatters countries apart and nationalism brings countries closer. These contrasts included political, geographical, constitutional, economic, and diplomatic. Politically, nationalism is noticeable in the presidential election of 1828 between John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson. In this election, Jackson controlled the electoral votes. Sectionalism is noticeable in a different election however, the 1856 election between James Buchanan and John C. Fremont. In this election the electoral votes were very close, and the popular vote even closer. Economically, nationalism was greatened by the war of 1812. This strong nationalistic time encouraged more people to work for their country. This brought in many citizens to help support factories and railroads and banking systems. While the southern sectionalists’ cornerstone to their economy was slavery and southern agriculture.…

    • 298 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most remarkable changes surrounding the Jacksonian Period was the advent of universal white male suffrage. By the election of 1824, several western states had been admitted to the Union. These new states such as Alabama, Missouri, and Ohio lowered their property qualifications to vote thereby encouraging higher participation by the average farmer, merchant, or laborer sending the theory of “rule by the best people” out the window. Granting greater access to the common man upset the balance of power away from New England during the heated debates of the tariff in which the Vice President, Calhoun, was able to force a showdown with Jackson ultimately resulting in a…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Major Political Personalities such as Henry Clay, Andrew Jackson, William H. Crawford, and John Quincy Adams were all candidates for president in 1824. This is where the first split began. All four candidates were from the Republican Party. Andrew Jackson won the popular vote but failed to win the majority of the Electoral College. According to the constitution, the top three candidates would be voted on in the House of Representatives. Clay was eliminated as he received the 4th amount of votes. Clay used his power as speaker of the House to throw his support to John Quincy Adams. Shortly after Quincy Adams’ election he placed Clay in the position of Secretary of State, a known stepping-stone to the presidency. Jackson called this “foul play”, and many of Jackson’s followers called the Election of 1824 a “corrupt bargain.” When election time came again in 1828 Jackson ran as a democrat while Quincy Adams ran as Republican. Jackson won the election as a Democratic. Jackson faced many crises during this time, which made him quite a few friends as well as many enemies. The Tariff of 1828, which sought to drive up tariffs on many southern products, was widely disapproved by the people in the south but highly accepted by people in the north and could be seen as a power struggle between Daniel Webster who was Pro-Tariff and John C. Calhoun who was Anti-Tariff. Calhoun advocated a complete nullification of the bill in South Carolina. Jackson responded immediately by…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Horace Mann benefits of free public schools were tied to the individual and society. He said an educated people is always a more industrious people, and that intelligence is a primary ingredient in the wealth of nations. The more educated people were the more prosperous America will be. Its is also a necessity and a right for a child to be educated. not to would be the equivalent of a death sentence.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let me begin with Andrew Jackson’s positives. The man was a strong believer of individual rights. Jackson believed in a limited government supported by a strong dg president at the top; the states were to govern themselves with limited federal interference with the president as a representative of the country’s population.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tariff of 1828 was a major factor that contributed to the emerging sectional conflicts during Andrew Jackson’s presidency. Passed by Congress in 1828, it was aimed to protect the booming industries in the north and tax the south on imported goods such as wool, fur, liquor, etc. The South was angry at paying a high amount on imported goods, since it harmed their economy. As a result, South Carolina threatened secession from the Union. Congress, hoping to make things work better for the south, issued the Tariff…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    North and South The United States of America, the great democratic experiment, was just that. Not since the great Greek culture had a government of, for, and by the people existed. The entire world felt, that on a large scale, democracy would inevitably lead to anarchy; our founding fathers were determined to prove them wrong. But as the political stand off with the British became a secession issue, a great issue split the future nation. Slavery, a southern necessity, both social and economic, threatened the unity of our nation. A nation that would one day be the greatest the world had ever known. During the development of the thirteen colonies, diversity set in early. In the south the temperate climate made the growth of tobacco a suitable and very profitable business. Cultivation of this crop required a lot of land, and therefore settlers lived far apart. Northern Colonies, though, were much more dependent on small farms, with closely knit communities. These differences were the seed of a sectional division that would plague the nation for a century. During the late seventeenth century, this fissure in the ideals of the colonies became apparent. Following the constant political irreverence from Britain, a majority of colonial representatives felt the need for independence. The Declaration of Independence was the document written to do this. It called for an abolition of slavery as well as freedom from British rule. Unfortunately, the South would hear nothing of it. Being strong defenders of states rights, most of the Southern states adhered to their believe in a government less like a supreme authority and more like a dominion of independent states. They would rather stay loyal to their oppressive government than participate in one that shunned their way of life. In order to keep their dreams of independence, they North was forced to make the one cession they did not wish to make. In order to keep a unified nation, the slavery issue was deliberately absent from…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North introduced high tariffs in order to exploit the productions of slavery in the South. If they couldn’t prevent it, why not benefit from it? And who was to know, maybe some extra money would be beneficial in the future because of the constant political struggles. The number one cash crop was cotton, also known as “King Cotton.” The South was outraged about the tariffs.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Monroe’s two terms, sectionalism, an excessive regard for sectional or local interest, increased greatly. This increase in sectionalism is due to acts like the Tariff of 1816. A tell tale sign that the Tariff of 1816 was going to cause sectionalism was that in the U.S. House of Representatives, the bill was passed by representatives in every section of the country except for the south. (In the south, “23 votes in favor, 34 against”.) The Tariff of 1816 was a protective tariff made to protect manufacturers from foreign competition. This protective tariff however, only helped the north because basically all of the United States’ manufacturing was being done in the north east. Since this protective tariff drove up the prices of foreign goods, the south wasn’t able to trade cash crops for manufactured goods of Europe for the same low prices that they had in the past. This of course caused great tension between the two sections of the country because the south viewed the north as the only ones being helped by the national government. Another issue that caused sectionalism was the debate over slavery. The authors of the constitution believed that slavery would eventually die out with the abolishment of the slave trade in 1808. This of course couldn’t be farther from what really happened. With the invention of the cotton gin, cotton production became a staple part of the American economy, with this mass production of cotton came an increased need for slave labor. Debates over slavery and whether it should be legal would cause great…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Jackson was well known for universal white manhood suffrage. By 1824, many westerner states were admitted into the union. These states lowered their property qualification in order to vote, encouraging higher participation of farmers, laborers and merchants. Jackson too wanted to…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson also supported the ban of anti-slavery pamphlets in the mail because he was a slave owner as well. During Andrew Jackson's term of presidency, he confronted some of the issues that defined a nascent nation still searching for its identity. The removal of all the Native Americans off their home land, the rise of the corporations, and slavery. A great president is someone who is a very strong and confident leader. Someone who can make choices that will change the country for the better, and does what is best for the good of all the people. Some people might just consider Andrew Jackson to be a very good president because he did things such as revolutionizing presidential campaigning, which also made him the very first modern president, and using his presidential powers to veto some of the bills that he thought could be unfit or harmful. Some others would argue that The former president Andrew Jackson was an evil president because he did things like enforce the Indian Removal Act and abided the power to veto in an effort to take more control over and intimidate congress. Speaking of the Indian Removal Act, it is the one thing Andrew Jackson did that most people totally and completely disagree with. Andrew Jackson instated the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This act evicted thousands and thousands of Native American families, specifically Cherokees, from their homes in Georgia and the Carolinas so the white…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In early 1860’s the Civil war took place, against the North and the South parts of America. In the time that was taken to reach the civil war, many small disagreements and arguments took place that eventually led to having an immense war. However, around three decades earlier, South Carolina had been having disagreements with the federal government. On May 19, 1928 the Congress of the United States passed the Tariff of 1828. The tariff was designed to protect industries in the northern United States which were being driven out of business, by low-priced imported goods by putting tax on them. Well it seems as if this was a great idea, until, the south started to feel the effects of it, on their antebellum economy. The south called the tariff of 1828, “Tariff of Abominations”. “South Carolina felt that the protective features of tariffs were harmful to them and they also claimed that they were unconstitutional because they favored North over the South.” (u-s-history.com)A government should serve their people with equality and liberty. Instead the federal government chose to be unfair and help the north because that’s where they…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays