Preview

Science as Inquiry

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
51162 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Science as Inquiry
Copyright © 2008 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Edited by Julie Luft, Randy L. Bell, and Julie Gess-Newsome

Arlington, Virginia

Copyright © 2008 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.

Claire Reinburg, Director
Judy Cusick, Senior Editor
Andrew Cocke, Associate Editor
Betty Smith, Associate Editor
Robin Allan, Book Acquisitions Manager
Art and Design
Will Thomas, Jr., Director
Tim French, Senior Graphic Designer (cover and interior design)
Printing and Production
Catherine Lorrain, Director
National Science Teachers Association
Gerald F. Wheeler, Executive Director
David Beacom, Publisher
Copyright © 2008 by the National Science Teachers Association.
All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.
11 10 09 08
4321
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Science as inquiry in the secondary setting / edited by Julie Luft, Randy L. Bell, and Julie Gess-Newsome.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-933531-26-7
1. Science--Study and teaching (Secondary)--United States. 2. Inquiry-based learning. I. Luft, Julie. II. Bell,
Randy L. III. Gess-Newsome, Julie.
Q183.3.A1S3526 2007
507.1’2--dc22
2007042206
NSTA is committed to publishing material that promotes the best in inquiry-based science education. However, conditions of actual use may vary, and the safety procedures and practices described in this book are intended to serve only as a guide. Additional precautionary measures may be required. NSTA and the authors do not warrant or represent that the procedures and practices in this book meet any safety code or standard of federal, state, or local regulations. NSTA and the authors disclaim any liability for personal injury or damage to property arising out of or relating to the use of this book, including any of the recommendations, instructions, or materials contained therein.



References: Aarons, A. B. 1990. A guide to introductory physics teaching. New York: John Wiley and Sons. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1990. Science for all Americans American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Benchmarks for science literacy Ault, C. R., Jr. 1998. Criteria of excellence for geological inquiry: The necessity of ambiguity Ausubel, D. P. 1963. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton. Barman, C. R., and J. D. Stockton. 2002. An evaluation of the SOAR–High Project: A web-based science program for deaf students Bell, P. 2005. The school science laboratory: Considerations of learning, technology and scientific practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Bell, P., and M. Linn. 2000. Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). 1994. BSCS middle school science and technology, teacher’s guide Bishop, B. 1985. The social construction of meaning—A significant development in mathematics education Borron, R. 1978. Modifying science instruction to meet the needs of the hearing impaired Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, eds. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school Bruner, J. 1961. The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review 31: 21. Burgstahler, S. 2004. Universal design of instruction. Retrieved January 12, 2007, from the University of Washington DO-IT website: www.washington.edu/doit/ Bybee, R. W. 1997. Achieving scientific literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Caldwell, O. W. 1920. Reorganization of science in secondary schools (Bulletin No. Caldwell, O. W. 1924. Report of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Committee on the Place of Science in Education Carnap, R. 1995. An introduction to the philosophy of science. New York: Dover. Cartier, J. 2000. Using a modeling approach to explore scientific epistemology with high school biology students (Research Report No 25, 2007, from the Wisconsin Center for Educational Research web site: www. Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers. 1915. Report of the Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers Committee on the Unified High School Science Course. School Science and Mathematics 15(4): 334. Chinn, C., and B. Malhotra. 2002. Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks Collette, A. T., and E. L. Chiappetta. 1989. Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education. 1918. The cardinal principles of secondary education (Bulletin No Committee on Secondary School Studies. 1893. Report of the Committee of Ten on secondary school studies Dalton, B., C. Morocco, T. Tivnan, and P. Mead. 1997. Supported inquiry science: Teaching for conceptual change in urban and suburban science classrooms. DeBoer, G. E. 2000. A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Dewey, J. 1910. How we think. Mineola, NY: Dover. Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan. Donohoe, K., and M. Zigmond. 1988. High school grades of urban LD students and low achieving peers Donovan, M. S., and J. D. Bransford. 2005. How students learn: Science in the classroom Driver, R., and B. F. Bell. 1986. Students’ thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view Driver, R., and J. Easley. 1978. Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students Driver, R., J. Leach, R. Millar, and P. Scott. 1996. Young people’s images of science. Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms Erwin, E., J. Ayala, and T. Perkins. 2001. You don’t have to be sighted to be a scientist do you? Issues and outcomes in science education. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 95: 338–352. Ford, D. 2006. Representation of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43: 214–235. Frank, J., G. R. Luera, and W. B. Stapp. 1996. Air pollution ozone study and action. Giere, R. N. 1991. Understanding scientific reasoning (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    help 3.06

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What are the potential hazards associated with using and this resource? (include at least two)…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labpaq Answers

    • 4268 Words
    • 18 Pages

    When you complete them, you will be very proud of yourself and will wonder why you were ever afraid of the “S” word – Science! After their first science course most students say they thoroughly enjoyed it, learned a lot of useful information relevant to their personal lives and careers, and only regret not having studied science sooner. Science is not some mystery subject comprehended only by eggheads. Science is simply a way of learning about our natural world and how it works by testing ideas and making observations. Learning about the characteristics of the natural world, how those characteristics change, and how those characteristics interact with each other make it easier to understand ourselves and our physical environment and to make the multitude of personal and global decisions that affect our lives and our planet. Plus, science credits on an academic transcript are impressive, and your science knowledge may create some unique job opportunities. All sciences revolve around the study of natural phenomena and require hands-on physical laboratory experiences to permit and encourage personal observations, discovery, creativity, and genuine learning. As increasing numbers of students embrace online and independent study courses, laboratory experiences must remain an integral part of science education. This lab manual’s author and publisher are science educators who welcome electronic technology as an effective tool to expand and…

    • 4268 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cowens, J. (2006, Augest 01). The Scientific Method.. Teaching Pre K-8, 37(1), 42-46. Retrieved from http://www.TeachingK-8.com…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 7 Perd Task 1

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my placement I had to plan and provide two different activities to promote children’s understanding of science. I planned both of the activities under the headings:…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    [Adapted from Krajcik, Czerniak and Berger, 2003, p.87, Teaching Science in Elementary and Middle School Classrooms: A Project-based Approach]…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As children start immersing themselves into the experimental world, they will enter the scientific laboratory and learn how to conduct cool observations, understand scientific terms like ‘acid rain;’ and discover fun facts like how many latex balloons per day can be made from one rubber tree?…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thematic Unit of Study

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Carin, A., & Bass, J.E. (2009). Teaching science as inquiry (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc. ISBN-13: 9780131599499 (Available as eBook)…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fleer,M.,Jane,B.,&Hardy,T. (2007). Science for Children: Developing a personal approach to teaching. (3rd Edition).Australia: Pearson Education.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why do many find science concepts so difficult to learn? Evaluate theory and research that seeks to account for this, and also consider research that has sought to address this problem at the level of classroom instruction.…

    • 6062 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    EMA E207

    • 3554 Words
    • 15 Pages

    References: Study Guide Week 22 Science today and for the future Howe, A., Davies, D., McMahon, K., Towler, L., Collier, C. and Scott, T. (2009) Science 5–11: A Guide for Teachers (2nd edn), London, Routledge…

    • 3554 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reading Philosophies

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Wittrock, W.C. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education. Studies in Science Education 12: 59-87.…

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EDP 4122 (2012) Science at Key Stages One and Two Middlesex University- in bibliography.Harlen, W 1999 Effective Teaching of Science: A Review of Research Edinburgh: Publication…

    • 2696 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    a) Discuss Inquiry-based learning in primary science, indicating its characteristics and its implications to pedagogy.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Erdermir, Naki (Dec.2009) “Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning And Teaching”, Volume 10, Issue 2, Article I.www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/v10_issue2/erdemir/erdemir2.htm#two…

    • 4750 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science Literature Review

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Science involves an inquiry process that pupils utilize to understand the world around them. The inquiry process demands the use of both thinking skills and practical skills. Together, they help pupils to develop their understanding of science by combining scientific knowledge with reasoning and thinking skills. (Teo N. 2003) I note that inquiry in science begins with observation of a phenomenon that is sparked by curiosity. It then develops questions predominantly from the knowledge background. Following which, data is gathered as evidence before hypotheses is derived and communicated. At this juncture, findings are shared and can possibly be challenged if new evidence is prevalent. Thus the scientific knowledge that we come to know today is a result of communication of ideas, concepts and hypotheses that shaped the knowledge. The nature of human inquiry is congruent to the processes described earlier as we reflect by observing, gathering, assembling and synthesizing information.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics