Preview

Res sub judice

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1977 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Res sub judice
Res sub judice1+2*
Section 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deals with the stay of civil suits. It provides that no court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties and that the court in which the previous suit is pending is competent to grant the relief claimed.
Section 10 reads thus:
Stay of suit: No Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same title where such suit is pending in the same or any other Court in India having jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed, or in any Court beyond the limits of India established or continued by the Central Government and having like jurisdiction, or before the Supreme Court.
Explanation attached to the section mentions that the pendency of a suit in a foreign Court does not preclude the Courts in India from trying a suit founded on the same cause of action.
Meaning of Res sub judice:
The concept of res sub-judice might have started with the jury system, but some countries have extended the concept to Bench trials.
Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) deals with Res sub-judice and Section 11 with Res judicata. Res sub-judice means that a case already pending before a judicial authority for resolution cannot be raised before another judicial authority by the same aggrieved person, if the first forum is empowered to adjudicate upon the issues raised before the second forum.
It is a salutary rule designed to prevent judicial forum shopping and trivialisation of law.
Res judicata, on the other hand, prevents the same person from raising a matter already resolved by a judicial forum.
Nature and scope of Section 10:
Section 10 declares in plain words that no court should

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Final Judgment Rule

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    [3] [pic][4] [pic]The two concepts to which St. Paul alludes are somewhat intertwined. The “one final judgment” rule prevents piecemeal dispositions and multiple appeals by requiring a final (as opposed to interlocutory) judgment before an appeal may lie. (9 Witkin, Cal.Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Appeal, § 43, pp. 66-67.) The doctrine of res judicata also addresses the issue of finality: it gives conclusive effect to final judgments in subsequent litigation between the same parties over the same controversy. (7 Witkin, Cal.Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Judgment, §§ 188-189, pp. 621-622.)…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Studies VCE Unit 2

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judges can only develop or change the law when a relevant case is brought before them. A case will be brought by a person who feels aggrieved or injured and has decided to have the issue resolved in court. A person bringing a case must have ‘standing’, that is, be directly affected by the case.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australian Criminal Law

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “ In Common Law jurisdictions when a judge is called on to deal with a new set of circumstances he is at liberty to decide according to his own view of justice and expediency; however in Code jurisdictions a judge is bound to deal in accordance with the principles already established, which he can neither disregard nor…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    U.S History

    • 22373 Words
    • 118 Pages

    that the Judiciary Act should, could laws be written that allowed the courts to ignore the…

    • 22373 Words
    • 118 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Govertnment

    • 2432 Words
    • 10 Pages

    * A civil case involve a dispute between two or more parties (in a civil court)…

    • 2432 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trial courts and appellate courts have differences not only in their functions but also in what and who are involved in the proceedings.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, in order to fully understand how judges can develop the law through the doctrine of judicial precedent, it is necessary to understand the operation of the doctrine. At the end of every case, the judge will give a judgment and explain his/her decision and his/her reasons. These reasons are derived from the evaluation of the principles of law and the judge will explain them based on these principles which are also known as “Ratio Decidendi” in Latin, meaning the reasons for deciding (Lewis, 2012). This ratio is basically a binding precedent towards future cases of similar facts in lower courts or courts of the same level with certain exceptions such as the Practice Statement (1966) and distinguishing that allows the avoidance of precedents. In other words, judges from the higher courts are able to develop the law through overruling and reversing the decisions made by lower courts, as the lower court’s precedents do not bind them but instead act as persuasive precedents. While judges from the lower courts or the same courts are able to develop the law through avoiding precedents…

    • 2369 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The doctrine of judicial precedent has been at the heart of the English legal system being a form of certainty for judges to follow long standing precedent which in fact, only slowly evolved and nurtured. Judicial precedent refers to the hierarchical structure of the English courts within which a decision of a higher court will be binding on a court lower in the hierarchy. However, there have been occasions where the Court of Appeal departed from the decisions of the House of Lords this has been treated with hostility by the Supreme Court.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (1) The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a State may sue or be sued by the name of the State and may, subject to any provisions which may be made by Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of such State enacted by virtue of powers conferred by this Constitution, sue or be sued in relation to their respective affairs in the like cases as the Dominion of India and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian States might have sued or been sued if this Constitution had not been enacted.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common Law

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In practice, common law systems are considerably more complicated than the simplified system described above. The decisions of a court are binding only in a particular jurisdiction, and even within a given jurisdiction, some courts have more power than others. For example, in most jurisdictions, decisions by appellate courts are binding on lower courts in the same jurisdiction and on future decisions of the same appellate court, but decisions of lower courts are only non-binding persuasive authority. Interactions between common law, constitutional law, statutory law and regulatory law also give rise to considerable complexity. However, stare decisis, the principle that similar cases should be decided according to consistent principled rules so that they will reach similar results, lies at the heart of all common law systems.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    JURISDICTION – The power of the Supreme Court to take case suo moto and to punish for its own contempt has been granted by Article 129 of the Indian Constitution.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Show Cause Notice

    • 14620 Words
    • 59 Pages

    State of Uttar Pradesh v. Union of India — (2004) 137 SRC 620 (S.C.) — Noted…

    • 14620 Words
    • 59 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mass Media Law Notes

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    v. Preliminary Injunction: after case is done, the defiant is prevented from ever repeating action. Can be preventive or remedial…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unwritten Law

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the case of Mokhtar v Arumugam [1959] MLJ 232, Smith J in a dictum said that the court could not award damages in the nature of interest for delay in the return of specific goods on the basis that such relief had been provided by section 29 of the Civil Procedure Act 1833 (English). He added that by of section 3(1) of the Civil Law Ordinance 1956, such relief, being a creature of English statute, is not available here.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Department

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. Cases or matters heard by a division shall be decided or resolved with the…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays