Porter's Generic Strategies Framework

Topics: Strategic management, Porter generic strategies, Michael Porter Pages: 10 (3430 words) Published: April 10, 2012
Porter's generic strategies framework constitutes a major contribution to the development of the strategic management literature. Generic strategies were first presented in two books by Professor Michael Porter of the Harvard Business School (Porter, 1980, 1985). Porter (1980, 1985) suggested that some of the most basic choices faced by companies are essentially the scope of the markets that the company would serve and how the company would compete in the selected markets. Competitive strategies focus on ways in which a company can achieve the most advantageous position that it possibly can in its industry (Pearson, 1999). The profit of a company is essentially the difference between its revenues and costs. Therefore high profitability can be achieved through achieving the lowest costs or the highest prices vis-à-vis the competition. Porter used the terms ‘cost leadership' and ‘differentiation', wherein the latter is the way in which companies can earn a price premium. Main aspects of Porter's Generic Strategies Analysis

Companies can achieve competitive advantages essentially by differentiating their products and services from those of competitors and through low costs. Firms can target their products by a broad target, thereby covering most of the marketplace, or they can focus on a narrow target in the market (Lynch, 2003) (Figure 1). According to Porter, there are three generic strategies that a company can undertake to attain competitive advantage: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus.

Figure 1: Source: Porter (1985)
Cost leadership
The companies that attempt to become the lowest-cost producers in an industry can be referred to as those following a cost leadership strategy. The company with the lowest costs would earn the highest profits in the event when the competing products are essentially undifferentiated, and selling at a standard market price. Companies following this strategy place emphasis on cost reduction in every activity in the value chain. It is important to note that a company might be a cost leader but that does not necessarily imply that the company's products would have a low price. In certain instances, the company can for instance charge an average price while following the low cost leadership strategy and reinvest the extra profits into the business (Lynch, 2003). Examples of companies following a cost leadership strategy include RyanAir, and easyJet, in airlines, and ASDA and Tesco, in superstores. The risk of following the cost leadership strategy is that the company's focus on reducing costs, even sometimes at the expense of other vital factors, may become so dominant that the company loses vision of why it embarked on one such strategy in the first place. Differentiation

When a company differentiates its products, it is often able to charge a premium price for its products or services in the market. Some general examples of differentiation include better service levels to customers, better product performance etc. in comparison with the existing competitors. Porter (1980) has argued that for a company employing a differentiation strategy, there would be extra costs that the company would have to incur. Such extra costs may include high advertising spending to promote a differentiated brand image for the product, which in fact can be considered as a cost and an investment. McDonalds , for example, is differentiated by its very brand name and brand images of Big Mac and Ronald McDonald. Differentiation has many advantages for the firm which makes use of the strategy. Some problematic areas include the difficulty on part of the firm to estimate if the extra costs entailed in differentiation can actually be recovered from the customer through premium pricing. Moreover, successful differentiation strategy of a firm may attract competitors to enter the company's market segment and copy the differentiated product (Lynch, 2003). Focus

Porter initially presented focus as...

References: Barwise, P. & Meehan, S. (2004), Simply Better, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Buzzell, R.D
Dess, G.G. & Davis, P.S. (1984), Porter 's generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, p. 467-488.
Hall, W
Hawes, J.M. & Crittendon, W.F. (1984), A taxonomy of competitive retailing strategies, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 275-287.
Kay, J
Kim, E. & Nam, D. & Stimpert, J.L. (2004), The applicability of Porter 's generic strategies in the digital age: Assumptions, conjectures, and suggestions, Journal of Management, Vol. 30, No. 5, p. 569-589.
Lynch, R
Macmillan, H. & Tampoe, M. (2000), Strategic Management, Oxford University Press.
Miller, D
Parnell, J. A. (2006), Generic strategies after two decades: a reconceptualization of competitive strategy, Management Decision, Vol. 44, No. 8, p. 1139-1154.
Parnell, J.A
Pearson, G. (1999), Strategy in Action, Prentice Hall Financial Times.
Porter, M
Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage, The Free Press, New York.
Proff, H
The Wikipedia encyclopaedia [Accessed on October 8, 2006]
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Michael Porter's Generic Strategies Essay
  • Michael Porter’s Generic Strategies Essay
  • Essay about Porter's Generic Strategies
  • Porter's Generic Strategies and Limitations Essay
  • Porter's Generic Strategies Explained Essay
  • Porter's Generic Strategies Framework Research Paper
  • Generic Strategies Essay
  • Michael Porterメs Framework of Generic Strategies Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free