Preview

Plato's Argument for a Just Life Essay Example

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1704 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato's Argument for a Just Life Essay Example
Plato's Argument For A Just Life

Plato's argument for the benefits of a just life is intrinsically linked to his definition of good and its relation to people's desires. He begins by showing that when the objective of a desire is simple (e.g. quenching a thirst), the desire must be correspondingly simple. Since thirst is a simple desire, the man's objective must also be simplistic and should we assign an adjective to his objective, we would falsely complicate it. In addition, Plato believes that we would be seriously erring if we assign a value of good to an desire.

In common use, the adjective good would denote something that is good in relation to others of its kind. We consider a drink good if it contains characteristics that we look for in a drink (e.g. pleasantness or taste). Plato takes this a step further and states that something that is good must not only be good in relation to others but it must be wholly good. Thus a drink cannot be truly good if evil results from it. This poses an interesting question for
Plato's readers namely, since no one wants bad things to happen to them, why do people engage in self-destructive activities? The answer lies in the fact that the only reason that we desire to drink is that we anticipate the result of our thirst being quenched. Our appetites see no further consequences than the immediate fulfillment of our desires; they do not contemplate the results of the actions we take to fulfill our desires.

For this reason, Plato believes that we must separate the soul based on how it reacts to desires. There must be a part of the soul, Plato reasons, that contemplates the end result of our actions and makes decisions based on a higher reasoning than desire. So we see two distinct parts of the soul. The first is said to be appetite (which desires without reason) and reason (which considers the consequences). Reason may thus work against anything that is not for the total good of the man. Plato holds that if the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato’s theory of justice is about equality and that one deserves punishment if they do commit an unjust action. During the Crito, Socrates tries to correct a lot of points that Crito is trying to argue with him about, what it means to be justice. To be justice, means a human being that does good based on the laws that are emplaced according to the state. Good people according to Socrates are only worth considering. People that do good are considered moral people, and have opinions that should be regarded because their inputs are considered to be ethically correct. Being a human of ethical virtues means that they must not do wrong. Anything that is immoral, is considered immoral. We as humans may not intervene in activities that deem to be…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    are right and wrong no matter the content of the act. It should be completely wrong to not treat everyone with respect based on who they are. Race, religion, sex and even medical diagnosis shouldn’t matter. Plato was an absolutist and he thought that as well as things being right and wrong, he thought that goodness itself really exists even after life itself. The highest form, the form of goodness had brought up the question of ‘What is goodness itself?”. Plato thought that goodness itself was the highest form of reality, which is an objective or absolute thing that existed eternally, beyond our limited world. He valued goodness very highly, comparing it to having the same importance that the sun has. We can look at this as having values and realizing that everything is important and good as well as all people. All people have a meaning to our society. We are all different because if we was all the same, we would be complaining of how bored we was. Plato thought that every moral situation was either right or wrong, and that our minds which were “distorted between pleasure and pain” could not perceive circumstances correctly, because we could not…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not agree with this theory. For Socrates, the key to a virtuous life was knowledge of the GOOD. He believed, if one knew the Good one would choose it. One always chooses the best of the options available. The question is what is the Good? He would say, evil is the result of ignorance, and that Wrong doing is involuntary. Evil doers must be educated, instructed as to what truly is the GOOD and then they will choose it. If people knew what was the right thing to do they would do it. We always choose what we think is the best or good for us. So, if someone chooses to do what we think is wrong, then that person made a mistake and must be educated to see the error. They mistook evil for the GOOD. But, I believe that there are many people that do commit evil doings, while truly knowing that they are in fact evil. Again, Socrates would indeed argue that these poor souls were somehow shown that these ways were the right ways or the “good” ways. I would love to believe that there is no evil in the world. But, I believe that there is evil within all of us, but it only comes out if we allow it.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato Republic

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The idea of harmony is very important for Plato to definite justice. As Plato explains: “Justice, I think, is exactly what we said must be established throughout the city when we were founding it that everyone must practice one of the occupations in the city for which he is…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato makes the reader question reality. There is so much one does not know outside of what one is accustomed…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, Book 1, various interlocutors make arguments on the definition of justice. Cephalus proposes the definition of justice as “speaking the truth and paying whatever debts one has incurred” (Plato, 331c). I will prove Cephalus’ argument true by analyzing the structure and his use of examples, discussing possible errors in his reasoning and finally rebutting those who disagree. Justice is knowing right versus wrong and acting on that understanding.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Analogy of the Sun by Plato tells us more about the Form of the Good. Plato believed that sight was the “most…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato's fundamental claim, in the Republic, is that justice is so great a good that anyone who completely embraces it is thereby better off,…

    • 3158 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    that it all depends on the situation or incident of for example, stealing is right or wrong.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I learned that the only completely good thing is a good will that can be conceived to be good without qualification. A good will is intrinsically good; it is self-contained…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so asserted that embodied existence is incoherent, as he described the soul as being immortal, and the body as mortal. Unlike science, he argued that the soul is inseparable and wholly reliant on the physical body. He suggested the soul as being “imprisoned” in the body, as the body merely serves to encase and protect the soul, which will eventually be freed from the restraints of the physical body at the point of death. According to Plato’s theory of the Forms the soul already has knowledge of the real world, and with training can recollect experiences of the Forms from its previous existence in the real world before it was incarnated into a physical body on this world. Plato presented the argument from knowledge in an attempt to prove that the soul’s…

    • 2365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Soul and Ethics

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Plato believed that a healthy and virtuous soul is one that functions harmoniously. He thought of the soul as being divided into…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Plato |Dual realities. The lower |Knowledge is gained only by |If a human possesses a virtuous |Dual parts. The body and soul |The Form of the Good. If the |…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays