There are about 350-400 million people living below the poverty line in India in which the rural areas constitute 75% of the total…
8 Jacob John, study on Kudumbashree project :A Poverty Eradication Programme in Kerala :Performance, Impact and Lessons for other States…
Only three percent of Indians pay income tax; our tax-GDP ratio is among the lowest in the world. This must change. Our elites must realise that India’s poverty has damaging consequences for them, and that they can help decrease it. The food security bill, with all its limitations, will hopefully contribute to generating such awareness, says Praful Bidwai.…
Poverty and unemployment are two acute problems common to most of the underdeveloped economies for which the government, planners, economists, politicians, scientists and researchers in these economies are putting their heads together for a solution. India is not an exception in this regard. Attainment of higher economic growth is not possible without efforts at employment generation and income augmentation. The population of rural India is more vulnerable due to socio-economic backwardness. Due to lack of adequate gainful employment opportunities they become excessively dependant on agricultural sector, which further adds fuel to the fire.…
Poverty reduction has been always a strategic consideration for all Sri Lankan governments since independence. As such, there have been many programs addressing the issue of poverty over the years. The poverty reduction framework is based on three strategies: Creating opportunities for the poor to participate in economic growth; strengthening the social protection system; Empowering people to participate fully in the development process. The Janasaviya and the Samurdhi (prosperity) program can be identified as two of the major income transfer programs conducted by the government of Sri Lanka. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the efficiency of the Samurdhi program to accelerate the rural growth and empower the rural poor in Sri Lanka. The finding shows that the Samurdhi program will empower the rural poor and accelerate rural growth in the country through the achievement of its objectives, creating employment opportunities and alleviating poverty if implemented in the proper manner. In contrary, it is also argued that the Samurdhi program by it self solely may not be sufficient to bring about rapid rural growth and poverty reduction through the trickle down effect. This analysis is undertaken based on data and information from secondary sources. The paper initially focuses on the theme of the paper there by the efficiency of the Samurdhi program to…
Our leaders in the Government boast of a high growth of GDP, its benefits are not percolating the common man, particularly the lowest strata of society. In the Human Development Index we occupy one of the lowest positions. A good chunk pi our population is still living below the[pic] poverty line despite our claim that the economy appeared to have “decidedly taken off and moved from; phase of moderate growth to a new phase of high growth. The very honour 01 India is at stake and yet we find we are not yet wide awake to the seriousness of the situation. The measures adopted so far leave much to be desired and it is doubtful whether the measures contemplated to he adopted in future will be imaginative and sincere enough to bale India out of the present…
In India still millions of people live below the poverty line & as long as there is poverty in a country it can’t become a developed country. So Indian government must take some serious steps to eradicate poverty from the country so as to make it a super power.…
Covering economy and policy in India can be hugely frustrating. One day you can hear how government wishes to launch a great new welfare scheme, which uses the latest technology and aims at targeting the most distressed. The very next day you could come across enough evidence of how that scheme is considered vile and unacceptable by the most needy themselves. What reconciles these two polar opposites is a mix of politics, misinformation and the legacy of decades of poor administration.…
The idea was initially to be found in the Government of India’s Economic Survey for the year 2010-2011 and was re-affirmed with the Finance Minister making reference to forwarding a policy of replacing some subsidies on certain goods with direct cash being given instead. Eminent scholars have since remarked that while this may seem like an obviously simple solution to the complex problem of poverty and crippling under-development in parts of the country, i.e. to put poor people on a better bargaining position by making up the disparity by giving them additional cash, the realities of this is not so black and white.…
Now the question is can we overcome it? There was a time in the history of India where no one was poor, now the things have changed. It has been estimated that if we go on by the present rate of development "8%" per year, with no mass calamities or war we can attain freedom from poverty by 2040 completely. Though there may be unemployment, but at that time the Govt. will have potential to take care of such people.…
POVERTY: In broader sense to be poor is to be hungry, to lack shelter and clothing, to be illiterate and not schooled and not to be cared for. Progress in human development and poverty eradication is achieved through revolts, history is full of such uprisings. poverty is not only linked with lack of income but also lack of fulfillment of basic needs such as water, shelter, food and clothing and human suffering and poverty. In India, poverty is officially linked to a nutritional baseline measured in calories (food energy method). The Planning Commission defines poverty lines as a per capita monthly expenditure of Rs 49 for the rural areas and Rs 57 in urban areas at 1973-74 all India prices. Poverty line correspond to a total household per capita expenditure sufficient to provide, in addition to basic non-food items – clothing, transport – a daily intake of 2,400 calories per person in rural areas and 2,100 in urban areas. Individuals who do not meet these calorie norms fall below the poverty line.…
India suffers from a lot of poverty, which means that many people there do not have enoughmoney. 27.5% of the population was living below the poverty line in 2004–2005.[1] Monthly per capita consumption expenditure is below Rs. 356.35 for rural areas and Rs. 538.60 for urban areas. 1 out of every 4 Indians earns less than $0.40 per day. 75% of the poor are in rural areas. Most of them are daily wagers and landless labourers.…
INTRODUCTION India has been a welfare state ever since her Independence and the primary objective of all governmental endeavors has been the welfare of its millions. Elimination of poverty, ignorance, diseases and inequality of opportunities and providing a better and higher quality of life were the basic premises upon which all the plans and blue-prints of development…
India has been a welfare state ever since her Independence and the primary objective of all governmental endeavors has been the welfare of its millions. Planning has been one of the pillars of the Indian policy since independence and the country’s strength is derived from the achievement of planning. The policies and programmes have been designed with the aim of alleviation of rural poverty which has been one of the primary objectives of planned development in India. It was realized that a sustainable strategy of poverty alleviation has to be based on increasing the productive employment opportunities in the process of growth itself. Elimination of poverty, ignorance, diseases and inequality of opportunities and providing a better and higher quality of life were the basic premises upon which all the plans and blue-prints of development were built.…
India’s strong economic growth has consistently tried to include the rural population, which is concentrated in areas where rain fed agriculture is the main economic activity. However poverty persists because of limited and inequitable access to productive resources, such as land, water, improved inputs and technologies and microfinance, as well as vulnerability to drought and other natural disasters. Low levels of literacy and skills conspire to keep people in the poverty trap, preventing them from claiming their basic rights or from embarking on new activities to earn income or build assets.…