N. Nageshwar Rao & Co. v. State of A.P
INDEX
CONTENTS
Page No.
Introduction
1
Issues Raised
1
Rules Applicable
5
Analysis
8
Conclusion
10
Bibliography
11
N. Nageshwar Rao & Co. v. State of A.P
1994 (6) SCC 205
Introduction
India is a Union of States and is governed by a written constitution. Rights being immunities denote that there is a guarantee that certain things cannot or ought not to be done to a person against his will. According to this concept, human beings, by virtue of their humanity, ought to be protected against unjust and degrading treatment. Thus the principle of the protection of human rights is derived from the concept of a man as a person and his relationship with an organized society, which cannot be separated from universal human nature. Human beings are rational beings. They by virtue of their being human possess certain basic and inalienable rights. We have tried to enshrine this concept by adopting a written constitution and thus ensuring people that nothing can be done to take a way the very basic essentials of human life from them even by the state.
The present case study deals with the detailed analysis of the loopholes present in today’s society due to non-application of a Article 300 in its proper form. This matter also shows how members of the society have made use of the contrary actions of different laws for their own personal gains and then tried to dodge from the legal actions and punishments. Issues Raised:
In order to understand the issues raised in the present matter it is important to go through the facts of the case which led to the following disputes.
There were a set of complaints and hence it becomes essential to only focus on therelevant issues and facts realted to our analysis and stick to facts in gist.
It has been found and is not disputed that the appellant carried on business in fertiliser and foodgrains under licence issued by the appropriate authorities. Its premises were visited by the Police Inspector,
CONTENTS
Page No.
Introduction
1
Issues Raised
1
Rules Applicable
5
Analysis
8
Conclusion
10
Bibliography
11
N. Nageshwar Rao & Co. v. State of A.P
1994 (6) SCC 205
Introduction
India is a Union of States and is governed by a written constitution. Rights being immunities denote that there is a guarantee that certain things cannot or ought not to be done to a person against his will. According to this concept, human beings, by virtue of their humanity, ought to be protected against unjust and degrading treatment. Thus the principle of the protection of human rights is derived from the concept of a man as a person and his relationship with an organized society, which cannot be separated from universal human nature. Human beings are rational beings. They by virtue of their being human possess certain basic and inalienable rights. We have tried to enshrine this concept by adopting a written constitution and thus ensuring people that nothing can be done to take a way the very basic essentials of human life from them even by the state.
The present case study deals with the detailed analysis of the loopholes present in today’s society due to non-application of a Article 300 in its proper form. This matter also shows how members of the society have made use of the contrary actions of different laws for their own personal gains and then tried to dodge from the legal actions and punishments. Issues Raised:
In order to understand the issues raised in the present matter it is important to go through the facts of the case which led to the following disputes.
There were a set of complaints and hence it becomes essential to only focus on therelevant issues and facts realted to our analysis and stick to facts in gist.
It has been found and is not disputed that the appellant carried on business in fertiliser and foodgrains under licence issued by the appropriate authorities. Its premises were visited by the Police Inspector,