UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
LESSON PLAN : SEPTEMBER 2012- JANUARY 2013
COURSE : BUSINESS LAW – LAW 416
LECTURER : PUAN FAZLIN MOHAMED ZAIN (Email: fazlin.mz@gmail.com, Room No.315, C2)
|Week No. |Topics |Date (tentative) |
|WEEK1 |Introduction | |
| |Lesson Plan, Evaluation |11.09.2012 |
| | | |
|WEEK 2 |MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM |18.09.2012 |
| |- Sources of Law in Malaysia | |
| | | |
|WEEK 3 |MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM | |
| |Legislative Process |25.09.2012 |
| |Hierarchy & Jurisdiction of Courts | |
| | | |
|WEEK 4 |LAW OF CONTRACT |02.10.2012 |
| |- Elements of Contract : | |
| |Offer, Acceptance | |
| |Postal Rule | |
| | | |
|WEEK 5 |LAW OF CONTRACT |09.10.2012 |
| |- Elements of Contract : | |
| |Intention to create legal relation, Consideration, Capacity | |
| | | |
|WEEK 6 |LAW OF CONTRACT |16.10.2012 |
| |- Discharge of Contract | |
| |- Remedies of Contract | |
| | | |
|WEEK 7 |SALE OF GOODS |23.10.2012 |
| |- Sale of Goods Act 1957 | |
| |- Formation of contract of sale |*MID SEM BREAK* |
| |- Implied terms under sale of goods |WEEK 8 |
| | | |
| | |(26.10.2012– 04.11.2012) |
|WEEK 9 |SALE OF GOODS | |
| |- Passing of property |06.11.2012 |
| |- Passing of title | |
| |- Remedies | |
| | | |
|WEEK 10 |LAW OF AGENCY |13.11.2012 |
| |- Nature & Creation | |
| |- Duties of Agent & Principal | |
| |- Termination of Contract | |
| | | |
|WEEK 11 |HIRE PURCHASE | |
| |- Formation & Formaties |20.11.2012 |
| |- Statutory rights & Obligation of Hirer | |
| |- Repossession by Owners | |
| | | |
|WEEK 12 |NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS | |
| |- Bill of Exchange |27.11.2012 |
| |- Cheque | |
| | | |
|WEEK 13 |PARTNERSHIP AND COMPANY | |
| |- Definition of Partnership |04.12.2012 |
| |- Liability of Partners | |
| |- Dissolution | |
| | | |
|WEEK 14 |PARTNERSHIP AND COMPANY |11.12.2012 |
| |- Effects of Incorporation | |
| | | |
|WEEK 15 |REVISION |18.12.2012 |
Important Dates
* Mid Sem Break : 26.10.2012-04.11.2012
* Revision week : 22.12.2012-02.01.2013
* Final Examination : 03.01.2013-21.01.2013
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In the contract between Mitsubishi and Crown Door Company ,the terms like”Mitsubishi would import the wood from Taiwan and deliver it to Crown’s plant in Atlanta”appears, which is a term of term“place of destination”.Therefore,the contract is a destination contract. A destination contract expresses that the risk of loss is on the seller while the goods are in transport and the risk of loss will be passed to the buyer when the goods are tendered to the buyer.As the goods were damaged because of railroad’s negligence in loading the train during transport, the risk of loss should be born by the seller.…
- 347 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Scott entered into a unilateral contract with Hume. Scott used the large signboard to offer $1000 to the ballplayer who hit a homerun over the sign. This is a promise for an act. Hume completed the performance of the act by hitting the homerun over the sign and therefore the unilateral contract between them was formed.…
- 317 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The case I have chosen is Meras Engineering, INC., et al. (Plaintiffs) V. CH20, INC., et al., (Defendants). Meras Engineering is a provider of water treatment solutions. They develop products that treat industrial and agricultural water applications. CH20 is a similar company that provides clients with chemicals that control the biological fouling in cooling towers. Rich Beriner and Jay Sughroue were employed by CH20 and signed a non-compete agreement during their employment. They both left CH20 and went to work for Meras. According to their non-compete agreement from MERAS v. CH2O, INC Northern District of California (2013) “after they ceased working for CH20 they would not work for “any business of similar nature to that of [CH20] which is in competition with [CH20]” for the period of three years”…
- 802 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Remember that these questions were designed to help guide the analysis you might do to develop appropriate recommendations. You need to focus on identifying and solving the major problem(s) in the case. Make sure you understand WHY you're doing each analysis and how you will use it to guide your recommendations.…
- 349 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v Bear Stearns & Co. (retrieved November 4, 2011) http://scocal.stanford.edu…
- 2266 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Review the case of Any Kind Checks Cashed, Inc. v. Talcott in Chapter 30 of the text. Write a short paper on whether or not you agree with the Court’s decision. Is it fair? In your opinion, is Any Kind a HDC?…
- 483 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Under the Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose, what two things must a seller know about a buyer? 280…
- 991 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
2) Is Bright entitled to specific performance because of the unique nature of the goods?…
- 359 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
John Thomas is the sole owner of the masonry company named Concrete 123, and is the only employee. Concrete 123’s area of business is based in Sacramento California, in Sacramento County. Thomas has the appropriate licenses and experience to conduct the work and has been self employed as a concrete installer for approximately seven (7)…
- 1897 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
5. Summarize, by reflecting in general on the impact legal issues can have in both small and large businesses.…
- 2363 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The following situations are similar (all involve the theft of Makoto’s laptop computer), yet they represent three different crimes. Identify the three crimes, noting the differences among them.…
- 255 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
If the representation will result in violation of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct or other law, the lawyer's physical or mental condition materially impairs the lawyer's ability to represent the client, or the lawyer is discharged.…
- 952 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Since Democratic Party is the one who proposed this law, most Democratic senators supported the medical device tax law. Obviously, this law will make the implementation of Affordable Care Act become more easier. The Affordable Care Act will be successfully only when government has enough money. Moreover, although many medical device manufacturers asserted that this tax is harmful to their businesses, these senators think that this tax just a small sacrifice from bigger revenue. After Affordable Care Act start to work, there are more than 30 million people who will gain health coverage under Affordable Care Act. In other words, all these people will become potential customers to medical device industry. Therefore, the increase revenue from these potential customers will offset the tax cost 1. Furthermore, we should consider the influence of this tax policy on other industries except medical device industry. Affordable Care Act is a very complicated project and influential to many industries. There are also some tax regulation to industries such as hospitals and health insurance companies. Democratic Party have to consider that the repeal of medical device tax may trigger the serial effects because the other industries such as insurance companies and hospital will try to repeal the tax they have to pay as well.2 Furthermore, medical device industry is one of the most profitable industry in United States. Passing this law not only make the Obamacare operate easier but also help U.S. government reduce the financial deficit. "Fracturing on anything related to the Affordable Care Act is one of the most moronic moves Democrats could make," said a Senate Democratic aide, who requested anonymity to speak candidly. "Repealing the medical device tax is playing into House Republicans' pathological obsession with dismantling the law at any cost. This is a more than $30 billion handout to one of the most profitable…
- 754 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
80. As courts decide cases involving the Internet and new kinds of issues not addressed previously, what role, if any, does precedent play? What role should it play? What difficulties could arise?…
- 394 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Nancy Johnston, appellant, brought suit against her employer, Del mar Distributing Co., Inc., appellee, alleging that her employment had been wrongfully terminated. Del Mar filed a motion for summary judgment in the trial court alleging that appellant’s pleadings failed to state a cause of action. After a hearing on the motion, the trial agreed with Del Mar and granted its motion for summary judgment.…
- 343 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays