Preview

i like google

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1562 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
i like google
Task 1
A. Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability Principles of Responsibility distinction
Tort liability in general, the principle of fault liability, under the special provisions in the law, to take the principle of liability without fault, if the law does not specify to which the parties the two sides nor the fault of the concept of fair, can also take the principle of equitable responsibility.
Contractual obligations after the conclusion of the contract, or the formation of the contract as well as the performance of the contract period, the damage due to the behavior of the party of the contract led to the other party in interest, and should bear the legal consequences.
Constitute elements of distinction
The contract responsibility includes: Contracting negligence liability and breach of contract. Liability for wrongs in conclusion of contract refer to a party in violation of the first contractual obligations in good faith and practical in the contracting process, caused the other the damage of the parties, therefore, should bear the legal consequences. Liability for breach of contract, is the party fails to fulfill the contract debt should bear legal responsibility.
Tort liability is the perpetrator subjective fault, its imputation principles applicable vary, but there must be consequences of the damage exist, no damage and non-infringement.
The difference the burden of proof
Tort liability, general tort victims, an obligation on the offender if there is fault of the burden of proof.
Contractual obligations, the defaulting party only prove to have statutory or contractual reasons disclaimer.
The difference the exemption conditions
The Tort Liability Disclaimer condition is only legal.
Contractual obligations in addition to the statutory exemption conditions, the parties to the contract agreed in advance not bear civil liability, but the parties may not be agreed in advance to waive the responsibility of intent or gross



References: 1. P. S. Atiyah. Introduction to Law of Contract. Beijing: Law Press,2002.1 2. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_cqdxxb-shkx200806019.aspx 5. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_gszfxyxb200401014.aspx

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence in this scenario includes the five essential elements of negligence, duty, breach of duty, the breach being the cause of injury, proximate, and the resulting damages (Lucas, 2008). In a case of negligence the individual or company may be held liable not only with negligence but sometimes with trespass, injury, and even mental or emotional harm (Lucas, 2008). However, the law requires these elements are proven in order to recover in a law suit against a torfeasor for negligence (Melvin,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cheeseman (2013), negligence is a "A doctrine that says a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions" (p.91). The elements of negligence include:…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    En1320 Unit 1 Research Paper 1

    • 27742 Words
    • 111 Pages

    negligence, or under any other theory of liability) for any loss or damage of any kind or nature related to, arising under,…

    • 27742 Words
    • 111 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the text; Torts and Personal Injury Law (Okrent, 2009); absolute (strict) liability holds a tortfeasor responsible for his or her behavior regardless of fault. Some people feel that it is unfair to hold a defendant accountable especially if he or she did not behave intentionally. “That is why absolute liability is restricted in certain types of activities, such as abnormally dangerous task and defectively dangerous products, where the risk involved substantially outweighs the benefits” (Okrent, 2009). Product liability is any form of liability arising out of the use of a defective product. A plaintiff can bring three different causes of actions depending on the facts: strict tort liability, negligence, or breach of warranty.” Under products liability, the manufacturer or the seller of a product is absolutely liable for a defective product that has caused an injury (Okrent, 2009).…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform in the Us

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort law is a type of law that is designed to offer remedies to civil wrongs. Unlike contractual damages that occur, where responsibility is predetermined, tort law is designed for someone who is legally injured to be able to recover damages from the person who is deemed legally responsible, or liable for such injuries. Tort law is broken down into three main categories, negligence, strict liability, and intentional tort. In negligence tort one is accused of causing damages through their carelessness. After accusation of negligence the plaintiff must be able to show that the defendant had duty of care, and that a breach of duty had occurred that caused the damages. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that makes someone responsible for damages caused by their actions (e.g. product liability). Intentional tort is much like negligence, but instead of one causing damages by accident, there was reckless action or intent to cause the damages that occurred (e.g. assault, battery). Tort cases are based on common law, which is laws that have been developed through court decisions, i.e. precedent. However, in certain cases tort law can also be based on statutory law laid out by the legislature. It is up to the court to decide which rule should take a higher standing depending on the case.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hot Coffee

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A tort is a non-criminal civil wrong that is caused either on purpose or through negligence (Simon, Eddins…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Products Liability Outline

    • 35396 Words
    • 142 Pages

    Any cause of action having to do w/a product; not a cause of action in and of itself; rather, it has to do with an injury or accident arising out of the use of a product (any product sold in the stream of commerce; must be sold by a merchant)…

    • 35396 Words
    • 142 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tort Law Definition

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Torts fall into three general categories intentional, negligent and strict liability. There are four basic objectives to tort law. The first is preservation of peace which eliminates reasons to seek revenge. Next is culpability or finding fault for wrong doing. Third is deterrence which is to deter the criminal from repealing his offences or deterring him from repealing the same act. The final objective is compensation which is to "make one whole" (or at least better) after for an injury or…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all actions brought to recover damage for negligence resulting in death or injury to person or property, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Explain the general differences between intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability. Additionally, explain the elements of intentional torts and negligence and provide working examples to illustrate each.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study of Tort Law

    • 5740 Words
    • 23 Pages

    B. Contractual liability is not necessary to prove that if there are some mistakes for one party who breaks a contract, importantly, it is just to indicate whether contract is performed. On the other hand, liability is established on basis of accidence and negligence of party who has tort behavior.…

    • 5740 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case Assignment

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The areas of law applicable to the factual scenario falls under remedies, if a party breaches a contract, the other is entitled to monetary damages. The purpose of damages is to put the plaintiff in the position it would have been in had the contract been performed. The courts have a method they have developed to determine the appropriate monetary damages in contract cases. The principle of law that is most appropriate for the factual scenario is referred to as expectation damages. Expectation damages give the plaintiff the benefit of its bargain, putting the plaintiff in the cash position they would have been in as if the contract had been complete. The general formula for expectation damages is Expectation Damages = Compensatory Damages + Consequential Damages +…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A contract is an agreement between two parties, each agreeing to do or forbear from doing something. A contract, if properly formed, is legally binding and all parties to a contract are required to perform their respective obligations under the contract, failing which legal action can be taken. A failure or refusal to perform one's obligations under the contract will be called a "breach" of the contract.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Vs Tort

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tort liability usually carries a monetary fine and does not identify the loser as a criminal. Tort liability does not provide for a proportional remedy as in criminal responsibility (Simmons, 1984). A party in a tort suit does not face the possibility of “loss of liberty or life” (Garland, 2012). A wrongful death lawsuit is a civil or tort lawsuit. The party may be found innocent in criminal proceedings but still be found guilty in a civil suit.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    hedley byrne

    • 26847 Words
    • 66 Pages

    However, in this case there was an express disclaimer of responsibility and there was therefore be no liability. This case established the doctrine of negligent misrepresentation, but in this case the disclaimer effectively barred the claim.…

    • 26847 Words
    • 66 Pages
    Powerful Essays