Preview

History Notes

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1159 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History Notes
Response paper 6-7 (this counts as two response papers).
Instructions:
Completing this assignment will require anywhere from 60-80 minutes. It will count as two response papers. This documentary is a case study in policy making. It helps us to learn about the mechanisms of making laws at the national level for high profile policies in America. In particular, this case focuses our attention on the role of powerful and wealthy interest groups in Washington, and how they can easily influence government and sway laws to their benefit. It also helps us to lean about who has power over and in government, who is represented, who has voice, influence, and who doesn’t.
Please, watch “Obama’s Deal: PBS Documentary Exposing Corruption and the Role of Big Money and Powerful Lobby in American Policy Making Process” by opening this link: www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamasdeal/view/?autoplay You may start filling out the questionnaire while you are watching the documentary. Simply copy these 14 questions into your response paper and answer them in the order of appearance.
1. What immediate problem did the president run into when initiating the healthcare reform?
2. Obama’s administration believed that taking on a healthcare reform is a test of what in American politics? According to Obama, it was intended to prove what?
3. Who opposed the healthcare reform under both Clinton and Obama? Who stood to lose from the healthcare reform?
4. What did the propaganda ads funded by insurance lobby advertise to the American public about the healthcare reform? Whose interests did they keep in mind when doing that?
5. Who could get to the congressional hearings on the healthcare reform? Was there anyone representing 50 million uninsured Americans at the congressional hearings?
6. While powerful insurance lobbyists initially stated that they would support the reform, what did they request in return and why? (hint: they wanted some feature added to the bill, what is that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    1.1. Summarize and discuss the proposed benefits under the PPACA (i.e. “Obamacare”). How will the federal government pay for any health insurance subsidies under the PPACA?…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Affordable Care Act (2009) and the Health Security Act (1993) were two attempts made to reform the U.S. healthcare system. In 1993 the Clinton administration fought to better the system and provide comprehensible healthcare coverage to its citizens. This bill however was shot down in the legislative system and never made it into law. Then in 2010 the Obama administration squeezed their updated version of the bill through the House and Senate in a very narrow, partisan victory. The reasoning behind why the Clinton’s attempt didn’t get passed came down to two reasons. First it was highly criticized and opposed politically. Secondly it was a matter of concerns about the actual content of the bill.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Reform Case Study

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The individual mandate in health reform is quite controversial. Discuss one policy argument supporting the mandate and one policy argument opposing the mandate=============.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anatomy Option 2

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Question : All of the following changes were a result of managed care except…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This assignment is to discuss the major provisions of the Massachusetts health care reform laws of 2006. In April there were about fifty eight which were put in to the law. By putting these into effect they made a stand for the health care reform. It was then that Massachusetts could provide affordable health insurance for its residents. When the legislation met they came to a compromise in which it was reached by the then Governor Mitt Romney who was a republican, and was also joined by Robert Travaglini and Salvatore Dimasi. It was discussed and believed that everyone in the state should have health insurance, but they were in hopes that it would be affordable. They finally decided to make insurance affordable as long as they could use…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discussion 4: Select one of the strategies presented in chapter 43-Box 43-4 on how to influence legislative and regulatory processes and discuss how you might use it to address your selected health care problem…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    With the election of President Obama, public healthcare has become a major issue in American politics. Currently the Democrats and Democratic Party are staunchly behind the new healthcare bill. In fact, even the Republicans have “frequently said they want to work with Democrats,” (Cohn 12) on the healthcare reform. Those words are all but meaningless as Republicans end up nearly unanimously opposing every single bill that comes from the Democrats. This is not the first time that a party has railed against the other on the issue of healthcare reform. Back in the 1970’s, “Richard Nixon put forward a health care reform proposal that Kennedy and his liberal allies rejected as too timid.” (Cohn 12) So,…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast two Medicaid plans from different states. Discuss your opinions regarding each state being able to choose how they administer the Medicaid program for their state. Does this leave some Americans at a disadvantage? Explain.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Agoritsas, T., Bovier, P. A., Deom, M., and Perneger, T.V. (2010). What doctors think about the…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    American democracy is based on the notion of a government, by the people for the people, but policy out comes are sometimes changed by the some range of factors, not necessary by the candidates which voters elect to represent on Election Day. One factor is the interest groups whom advice government on using a variety of tactics, one of the two tactics is the inside game plan and outside game plan. The inside game plan means to convince government officials through face to face contact (direct contact). The other term is lobbying. Washington is filled with lobbyist. Lobbyist usually work for corporations and interest groups. We as the people should put a stand on much lobbying are wasting, and advice the government to put limitations on the interest group.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ObamaCare and the Healthcare System Medical and health insurance is a very helpful and needed aid in America. Although not…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dunham, Will. 2010. “TIMELINE-Milestones in Obama 's quest for healthcare reform”, Reuters. Retrieved September 11, 2011 from…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health Care Reform

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. In what ways have recent health care reform measures expanded or inhibited access to care?…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Healthcare Insurance Issues

    • 2493 Words
    • 10 Pages

    O 'Brien, S & About.com (2008). Baby Boomers and Healthcare: What are the problems and…

    • 2493 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pushing a Wet Noodle

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A.) As a group we decided to kill things more than to amend or keep them. I think that had a lot to do with the different roles everyone in the group had, and the people they were trying to please. Members were politically at different ends of the spectrum. There were only two issues that everyone wanted to keep or cut completely. As a group, we were all able to agree on provision C, mandating that insurance companies cannot exclude or deny coverage for pre-existing conditions, and provision G, a mandate that established a patient 's bill of rights. The only provisions we amended was provision F, eliminating the first two sentences, as well as provision A, changing the required minimum payment to 45% the cost of the premiums. We decided to kill provisions B, D, E, I, J, L, and M. These were generally provisions that put strict rules on making sure that people had health insurance by a certain point, I myself was for most of these provisions, but the conservatives of the group were usually strongly against. There were more conservatives in the group, so republican was the majority party, which gives them more power. Provisions that looked as though they would cost the country more money, conservatives were almost always voting against.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays