Han China vs Imperial Rome Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
The Methods of political control used in Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) were similar to that of Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.), however, these societies greatly differed on their opposition to governing and the techniques used in maintaining control over their citizens, expansion, and internal conflicts that later resulted to their decline.

Han China and Imperial Rome's government were similar due to the fact that they were ruled under one central leader. Han China had an emperor, who would enforce policies. Imperial Rome had a republic because they felt as though a monarchy did no good to the people. Although, the Senate of Rome had most of the power over the citizens. The differences between their rule was that in Han China the lower class citizens did not have any say on how they were ruled, while in Imperial Rome the plebeians, ordinary people, had representatives in the Senate, tribunes. Another difference between Han China and Imperial Rome is that, in Han China the emperor was chosen through family(hereditary), while in Rome they chose their ruler.

Both, Han China and Imperial Rome, emphasized territorial expansion. Both, Han China and Imperial Rome, perceived threats to security, which then led to wars and conquests that only increased the length of border and led to more threats, which led to more wars. The differences of the two expansions is that Imperial Rome built up its army, from citizen-farmers, to conquer lands and due to the many conquests Rome had many slaves. Han China had an impressive military at their disposal to enlarge the empire. Han China conquered many lands, but were not brutal to those they conquered like Imperial Rome and did not have slaves as a result of their ever growing territory.

Han China and Imperial Rome had similar declines due to internal conflicts, but they still had their differences. Han China and Imperial Rome's over-expansion led to invasions by nomadic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial administration in Imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E and Han China from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E. had both their similarities and differences. Similarities include general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. One major difference is the method of political control with religion, and the way their leaders were selected.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The roman and Han Empire were different in their political and governmental control through the use of the monarchy and the republic system. The monarchy of the Han Empire was a method of political control because it really strengthened the power of the government to really crackdown on the citizens to make sure that there were no protests or any riots. This control also showed the kinds of beliefs that they had in Han China. Also another type of political control that they used was the filial piety. Filial piety is the respect for your father and elders. This kept the people in check because they had to respect all their elders and the people that were above them. In the Roman Empire the republic method was more based on keeping the society happy then using political authority power. They would hold bread circuses and different events such as the gladiatorial games to keep them happy and prevent riots. The effectiveness of the system in Rome is demonstrated by the explosion of art, giving credit to people that…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ancient civilizations of Rome and Han China shared both similarities and differences in their social, political and economical views.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han and Roman Empire

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both civilizations had very strong central governments which allowed for powerful and expanding kingdoms. Both empires had to develop road systems for their expanding military. The Roman army men were experienced and privileged and held high ranks in their class system and played an important role, along with the senate, in choosing an emperor. The center power for the Roman empire was generally the senate. The ruler for the Han dynasty was hereditary. The Han dynasty's military wasn't as loyal. Most of the soldiers were newly drafted and didn't have much experience. China had two capital cities which served as seats of power for emperors and they were Louyang (located in the east) and Chang'an (located in the West). The merchant class in Han was restricted by the government unlike the middle class in Rome whom were free from government constraints which allowed economic mobility. The imperial model was only revived in China later but it never revived in Rome.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China And Rome Dbq Essay

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire both expanded their boundaries to the point where many thought they would be impossible to defeat. Regardless of that power, both empires had very devastating falls. Though they were both very different societies, China having a centralized bureaucracy, and Rome having a rule based on laws and private authorities, like many empires, many aspects of their defeat are similar. Some of the ideas contributing to this fall was the stress on military, the high taxes placed on citizens, and the religions of each empire.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Vs Han

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a lot in common, but they also have many differences. For instance, the Roman Empire relied heavily on slave (mostly prisoners of war) labor, but the Han Dynasty relied greatly on free peasant labor. Although both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a well organized bureaucracy, the Han Dynasty had bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideology. Also the Han Dynasty did not have paved roads, where as the Roman Empire constructed many paved roads (which was because the romans discovered concrete).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both empires had problems with social in takes. The Han Dynasty had problems with taxations, peasants grew angry over the raise of taxes and revolved against china so they used the military to stop them but soon needed more soldiers so, the Han government forced many farmers and others to fight as well, generating a large group of angry citizens. The Romans struggled with religion more than taxes as Christianity spread through Rome officials…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty declined gradually, mostly due to multiple invasions by foreign people. However, while the Roman Empire showed a decrease in population, Han population rose greatly, leading to two very different outcomes for the ancient civilizations.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hierarchy. But in contrast, the Romans were more benign on the one affecting the family’s hierarchy,…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A few similarity can be they are both empires and a difference can be they are located in different areas.The Rome and the Chinese both had an emperor or king. Rome and China both had a big and strong army to protect their borders, they both even had tall and strong wall to keep people out and for protecting the borders in their land. Both of the countries invented a lot of things that we are using today. In Rome, they have some laws that are the same as China’s laws. Rome and China are in different areas, but they are close or near each other. Rome and China used the same items because Rome improved a lot of them. They both had a village like a place where the people live. They both had their own way of doing art because China painted while Rome sewed pictures into cloth.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and China are alike in ways that they both fell due to external interactions and problems within the Empire. Both civilizations experienced nomadic invasions from Huns or nearby tribes. In Rome Germanic tribes were forced out by the Huns and had no choice but to move toward Rome. This forced them to hire mercenaries to protect Rome, adding tot the deficit. Roman leaders were weak and corrupt and focused heavily on pleasure seeking, instead of trying to improve Rome. Rich and powerful men could easily buy their way into the government. They spent money unwisely and could not collect tax from citizens efficiently, decreasing their funds. Weak emperors could not solve economic issues, and only offered solace by providing the poor with "bread and circuses" . In China officials could easily get family and relatives into power and order assassinations to acquire positions, which weakened the central government. Both empires had a wealthy aristocratic class and a poor peasant class that relied on agriculture. The social unfairness led to rebellions such as the yellow turbans and injured the relationship between the state and people. Since both civilizations were in constant contact with others either by trade or war, both empires suffered from plagues which wiped out a large amount of the population. With lack of people, the economy started to fall and social unrest rose. The combination of internal corruption and disorganization in conjunction of outside attacks were able to topple Rome and China. With all the turmoil many citizens…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ancient civilizations of Rome and Han China shared both similarities and differences in their social, political and economical views.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, decentralization occurred and upper classes’ values in both societies changed. In Han China, landlords ruled their neighborhoods according to their wishes. In Rome, farmers gathered under the protection of landlords. The decentralization occurred because in both societies, the central government was weakening and quality of imperial rule was declining so landlords became the source of power. Another reason was that in Han China, bureaucrats were becoming corrupt. In Rome, the upper class became more pleasure-seeking, and did not participate politically and economically. The upper classes’ shifting values caused the empires to crumble because they did not want what was contributing to the success of the empire, only to their personal gain.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China and Imperial Rome’s methods of political control vary religiously through the influences of their religions on the people and government, as well as through leadership styles; however, they are analogous regarding territorial expansion through reliance on the military.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays