Preview

Gravimetric Determination of Calcium

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
808 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gravimetric Determination of Calcium
Phuong Pham
Prof. Johnson
Lab 3 Gravimetric determination of Calcium as CaC2O­4.H2O
Feb, 27, 2014
I. Objective:
The purpose of this lab is to determine how well gravimetric method measures the calcium level in a solution of known calcium concentration.
II. Method:
a) Overview:
In this lab we will prepare 25 mL known concentration Calcium solutions. Then we will use Gravimetric method to determine the concentration of Calcium in each solution to figure out how well this method is. As we know, Ca2+ can form precipitation with oxalate in form CaC2O4. H2O in basic solution. So, in this method we will slowly precipitate all Ca2+ in the solution with C2O42- in acidic HCl solution and slowly raise pH of the solution by thermal decomposition of Urea. Then, we will filter and dry the precipitation from the solution and mass the precipitation. After all we will calculate to figure out how much Ca in the precipitation, then compare with the expected Ca amount.
b) Procedure:
The experiment is done in Room condition.
We are prepared with standard mass of Gooch crucible so we can skip drying crucible process.
In this experiment, we transfer 25mL of Ca2+ from 500mL solution of 8.9037g Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) in 0.46M HCl into a 250mL beaker, then add 75mL HCl 0.1M acid into thebeaker. Next, we add 8 drops methyl red indicator to the beaker. After that, we add 25mL ammonium oxalate to the beaker and mix the solution. Mass around 15 g urea and add them to the beaker. (our amounts of urea are 15.048g (added in crucible A) and 15.099g (added in crucible B).While one of us is preparing another solution in another 250mL beaker with the same process, the other will boil the 1st beaker until the solution turn clear completely, which takes around 40 mins. After the 1st solution is done with the boiling process, one of us filter the precipitation from the 1st beaker with Gooch crucible A, which takes around 30 to 40 mins, the other will boil the second solution. When the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Experiment and Observation: Weigh out your 1.0g of CaCl2-2H20 and put it into the 100mL beaker, add your 25mL of distilled water and stir to form the calcium chloride solution. Next, use stoichiometry to determine how much Na2CO3 and put it into a small paper cup. Then add the 25mL of distilled water to make the sodium carbonate solution. Mix the two solutions in the beaker and a precipitate of calcium carbonate will form instantly. Next, set up your filtration assembly. After the filtration assembly is ready, swirl the contents of the beaker to dislodge any precipitate from the sides. Then, pour the content of the beaker into the filter paper-lined funnel carefully. Afterwards you will need to measure out 2 to 5mL of distilled water into a graduated cylinder. Pour it down the sides of the beaker, swirl, and pour into the filter paper-lined funnel. Once all the liquid has drained from the funnel, lay the filter paper containing the precipitate on folded layers of paper towels and set it somewhere to air-dry. Once the filter paper and the precipitated calcium carbonate are completely dry, weigh them, subtract the original weight of the empty filter paper, and record the net weight of the calcium carbonate. That is your actual yield of calcium carbonate. Then, you can calculate the percent yield, using your theoretical yield and actual yield. Be sure to clean up properly, rinse any remaining chemicals down the sink and throw paper cups and towels in the garbage. Clean and dry all equipment you used. The following results will be observed:…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Qwerty

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A 50-mL buret, a 250-mL volumetric flask, and 25- and 50-mL pipets were obtained from stockroom. The 0.5 g of calcium carbonate was weighted in a small 50-mL beaker. Approximately 0.4 g of the carbonate was transferred to a 250-mL beaker. 25 mL of distilled water was poured to the large beaker and 40 drops of 6 M HCl were added. Then, solution was heated until it just begins to boil. After boiling 50 mL of distilled water was added to the beaker. The flask was stoppered and mixed thoroughly by inverting the flask. The buret was filled with the EDTA solution. The blank was prepared by adding 25 mL distilled water, 5 mL of the pH 10 buffer to a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask. Small amount of solid Eriochrome Black T indicator was added. EDTA was added to the solution until the last tinge of purple just disappears. Three 25-mL portions of the Ca2 + solution were drawn separately into clean 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks. To each flask add 5 mL of the pH 10 buffer, a small amount of indicator, and 15 drops of 0.03 M MgCl2 were added. The solution was titrated in one of the flasks until its color matches that of your reference solution.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Put 1.00 g of calcium carbonate and place it to the labeled beaker. Then record the mass and…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) Mix only the calcium chloride and red phenol, and observe any changes that occur.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the results recorded it was identified that activity A and C had exothermic reactions, whilst activity B had an endothermic reaction. Each of the activities had initially begun with 23.4/8/9oC, however, within one minute of adding the 2nd reactants, the results began showing, as seen from the graph. Activity A and C had risen in temperature, with A gaining 4oC and in total of 2 minutes having the temperature of 27.9oC along with C increasing by 2.2oC and within 2 minutes of the experiment having the temperature of 26oC. Activity B however was the anomaly in the test, as the temperature went lower, by 1.9oC as within 2 minutes, the Ammonium Chloride and water had the temperature of 21oC. Furthermore the line graph shows Activity A and C rising to its highest peak, although it eventually reduces. Activity A for example, was rising until it reached 27.9oC and it continuously decreased, until the 10 minute mark had reached having the final temperature similar to the initial temperature. A similar thing occurred to Activity C however, as its highest peak was 26oC (2 minutes in the test), and the final temperature having a 0.1oC difference from the initial temperature.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lab 3 no name

    • 1348 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Experiment and Observations: As I performed the lab, I had to retrieve all my equipment’s from my labpaq. As I started to setup, I had to weigh out 1.0 gram of CaCl2*2H2O on the digital scale. After it was weighed, it was added to the 100 mL beaker and 25 mL of distilled was added and stirred. Next, I had to figure out the amount of the second reactant, so that it can be added to the solution. I had to perform stoichiometry to figure out the amount of Na2CO3 is needed to make a precipitate of calcium carbonate. After the calculations, I arrived at .72 grams of Na2CO3 and rounded to the nearest tenth to mix with 25 mL of distilled water. After both of the reactants were mixed separately with distilled water, they both were clear color. As soon as you added the solution of Na2CO3 to CaCl2*2H2O the color of solution changed to a cloud white color. When both solutions are mixed, the paper filter that was provided with the lab must be weighed and recorded. Then you pour the solution into the paper filter to filter out the precipitate and dry the filter to weigh the mass of the precipitate when it dries. After it dried, it was weighed and stoichiometry was performed to see what the…

    • 1348 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hydrate Formula

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The purpose of this lab is to determine the formula of a given hydrate through collecting and calculating experimental data.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limiting Reactant Lab

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    25 mL of sodium iodate solution was added to each flask. Using 10 mL and 25 mL graduated cylinders, the following volumes of CaCl2 solution with a concentration of 22 g/L was added to the Erlenmeyer flasks. In flask 1, 5 mL of CaCl2 solution was added. In flask 2, 15 mL of CaCl2 solution was added. In flask 3, 25 mL of CaCl2 solution was added. In flask 4, 35mL of CaCl2 solution was added. In flask 5, 40mL of CaCl2 was added. The mixture was stirred into each flask. The observations about the reaction in each flask was recorded in the Results and Analysis section. The filtration process was the same for each product. First, the suction filtration apparatus was set up. Using a Buchner funnel, the funnel was fit in a filter flask, which is an Erlenmeyer flask with a second opening off the side of its neck. The second opening was attached to an aspirator, which provided the vacuum. A circular piece of filter paper was placed over the holes in the bottom of the Buchner funnel. A heavy rubber tube was connected to the side arm opening on the filter flask. Then, the tube was attached to a special side opening on a water…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hydrated Chloride

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Once cool, the empty crucible was weighed and approximately 2-3g of Hydrated Barium Chloride was added to the crucible. The crucible and contents were then weighed on a balance and a note of the mass was taken. The crucible was then heated for 15minutes using a blue Bunsen burner flame on the pipe-clay triangle, with the lid partially covering the contents. The crucible was then transferred to the desiccator using tongs. Once cooled, the crucible + contents were re-weighed. This process was repeated, heating for about4 minutes each time, until two successive balances reading were within 0.002g of each other, at this point the contents were at constant mass, and all of the water had been removed. The value of n in BaCl2.nH2O was then…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The unknown used in this experiment by this group is unknown # 9. The result obtained from this experiment shows that the unknown contains Ca2+, Mg2+ and NH4+cations.The test made for Ca2+ both on the unknown and the control showed a white precipitation after the group performed the necessary steps from the flowchart for Ca2+ test. The blue solid precipitation the group obtained at the end of the test for magnesium in both the control and unknown is the evidence for the presence of Mg2+ in the unknown # 9.The test for NH4+ made on both the control and the unknown turned the litmus paper to blue which is an indication that the unknown contain NH4+.…

    • 4019 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Instructor Changes: Weigh out about 1.7 g of CaCl2·2H2O and record your mass to +/- 0.1 g (for example 1.6 g, 1.7 g, or 1.8 g). We have made this change so that you will have 2 sig figs in subsequent calculations.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mass of the weighing dish was measured as 0.6 g. The mass of the filter paper was measured as 1.0 g. Initially it was calculated that 0.68 g of CaCO3 was needed for a full reaction. The net mass of Na2CO3 (reactant) was 0.72 g and the net mass of CaCO3 was 0.7 g. The dried calcium carbonate measured at 0.7 g (net mass).…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Measuring the mass of beaker 1 we got 66.26 g and adding 5 g of the sample we totaled 71.26 g. And measuring the mass of the second beaker we had 69.73 g and by subtracting 71.26 g we got 1.53 g for NaCl. After that we evaporate SiO2 in a dish and we had the mass of dish + the sample as 43.37 g the dish itself was 42.68 g and we got the mass of SiO2 as .69 g. Our final result was for CaCO3 we measured the mass of watch glass + filter paper and got 47.96 g and measuring again with the sample we got 55.06 g, after drying our CaCO3 mass was 7.1 g. As a total recovered mass we got 9.32 g from the initiate mass which was 5 g. The percent recovery is 186.4% and the error was 86.4%.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first thing we needed to do for this experiment was to weigh 1.0 g of CaClᴤ ˣ 2HᴤO and placed it into a 100 mL beaker. Next we measured 25 mL of water and added it to the beaker with the calcium chloride dihydrate and stirred until the granules were dissolved and mixed with the water. The water became slightly cloudy. Next we had to figure out how much NaᴤCoᴣ we needed for this experiment. I know that for this we need mass/molar mass and that equals 1.0/147.015=.006802 mol. Next we use the mol which is .006802 and multiply by the molar mass which equals: .006802 ͯ 105.99= .72 g of CaClᴤ * 2HᴤO. We could then pour this into the beaker with the calcium chloride dihydrate solution. Instantly, the solution turned milky white. I then folded my filter and placed the filter into the funnel and poured the milky solution into the filter lined funnel. The liquid poured through into the paper cup inside the coffee mug. It filtered slowly and I had to continually stop to allow the liquid to drain once all the milky solution went into the liner I waited until no more water was dripping from the funnel. Finally, I was able to remove the filter and placed it on a folded paper towel until dried completely. While I was waiting for the filter to completely dry I calculated the theoretical yield. To do this we use: 1g CaClᴤ*2HᴤO * (1 mol CaClᴤ*2HᴤO/147.015 g CaClᴤ*2HᴤO) * (1 mol CaCOᴣ/1 mol CaClᴤ*2HᴤO) *…

    • 1470 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Two Unknown Substances

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Since an acid + carbonate Salt + water + Carbon Dioxide, and lime water (Calcium Hydroxide) precipitates to Calcium carbonate when exposed to CO2, then if the unknown substance is placed in Hydrochloric acid and the captured gas causes precipitation (precipitation in ionic compounds generally form if the opposite charged electrons of two substances are attached, hence those with same charges do not form precipitate) in the lime water, it must contain carbon. The only carbon ions that result in precipitate in Calcium Hydroxide are Carbonate ions (CO3-2) which react with the calcium ions (Ca+2) to form the precipitate. Hence, the identification of a carbonate concluded to being the case, as after testing the experiment twice with different masses the results were very similar (hence being reliable) and supportive of the confirmation (they both created precipitation). To further conclude the identity of the 2nd unknown substance a second step was done, which was a pH test through the use of the universal indicator (measures pH by containing various indicators that respond differently to Hydrogen ions). A controlled test was done to ensure the pH scale was correct, and once the two concentrations were placed into the diluted indicator (through water) a distinct purple was achieved. This points closely towards either Sodium or Potassium carbonate, as they fall into the distinct purple colour. However, this test proves to be somewhat invalid as the addition of water into the Universal indicator could have resulted in a chemical reaction occurring with the unknown compound, hence changing the possible pH. To finally conclude what the unknown substance’s identity was, a flame test was conducted to see what colour the substance would create. The flame test creates different colours due to the movement of electrons in the metal ions…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays