Public Organiz Rev (2010) 10:31–47
E-Government in Kazakhstan: Challenges and Its Role
Shahjahan H. Bhuiyan
Published online: 9 July 2009
# Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009
Abstract This paper critically examines the progress made in introducing and implementing e-government programs and policies in Kazakhstan. It argues that in order to achieve the articulated development goals, the Kazakh government has moved toward e-government paradigm to ascertain a people-centered, accountable and transparent government. Available data substantiates that the initiative faces several challenges such as political support and relationship between political institutions, bureaucracy and citizens, digital divide, widespread corruption, lack of human resources, and inadequate infrastructural development, which needs to be amputated to improve public service delivery. This study illustrates some international development experiences to understand the benefit of e-government. Such experiences may serve as policy guidelines to the successful implementation of e-government to ensure overall development in Kazakhstan.
Keywords Development . E-government . Kazakhstan . Service delivery
Electronic governance has been widely endorsed as a solution to a range of predicaments in the public sector. With promises of decreasing corruption, cutting red tape, reducing government costs, and fluctuating participatory governance, the egovernance revolution has swept most nations, capturing the imaginations of policy makers and attracting the interests of citizens and business alike (Salem 2006). Electronic government evolves swiftly through defined stages, beginning with a web presence of public agencies (“interaction”) to a means for citizens around the clock seven days a week in the convenience of their homes (“transaction”) (Netchaeva 2002). This essentially creates a new ground for public sector operation. The S. H. Bhuiyan (*)
Department of Public Administration, Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics, and Strategic Research (KIMEP), 4 Abai Avenue, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan e-mail: email@example.com
sequence of stages was depicted as inevitable, fueled by technology, citizen demand, and economic realities in the public sector (Mayer-Schönberger and Lazer 2007). The prime objective of any technological innovation is to improve the quality of human condition. This cannot be achieved by technological advances alone. First and foremost, they have to be successfully applied to human society. Such an approach is significant for governance and public administration because of its impact on a larger section of the society (Sharma 2002). To reap benefit of the information and communication technology (ICT), international development agencies are paying considerable attention to the gradual improvement of egovernment, particularly in developing countries. The most recent United Nations Report entitled e-Government Survey 2008: From e-Government to Connected Governance succinctly illustrates the importance of e-governance: ‘E-government can contribute significantly to the process of transformation of the government towards a leaner, more cost-effective government. It can facilitate communication and improve the coordination of authorities at different tiers of government, within organizations and even at the departmental level’ (UN 2008, p.xii). In the same vein, the 2001 Human Development Report entitled Making New Technologies Work for Human Development, commissioned by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), clearly portrays the role of ICT for development as it stated: ‘[I]t is time for a new partnership between technology and development. Human Development Report 2001 is intended as the manifesto for that partnership’ (UNDP 2001, p. iii). Again, in the United Nations system, the World Bank launched an e-government website, and in...
References: ADB (Asian Development Bank). (2008) Asian development outlook 2008 [Kazakhstan]. Available at:
http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/ADO/2008/KAZ.pdf, last accessed December 5, 2008.
Agarwal, P. (2008). Economic growth and poverty reduction: evidence from Kazakhstan. Asian
Development Review, 24(2), 90–115.
Aminuzzaman, S., Baldersheim, H., & Jamil, I. (2003). Talking back! empowerment and mobile phones in
rural Bangladesh: a study of the village phone scheme of Grameen Bank
Bakenova, S. (2008). Civil service in Kazakhstan: Déjà Vu? International Journal of Public
Administration in Central and Eastern Europe, 1, 89–96.
Bayes, A. Braun, J. V., & Akhter, R. (1999). Village pay phones and poverty reduction: insights from a
Grameen bank initiatives in Bangladesh
Bhuiyan, S. H. (2006). E-government in Bangladesh: prospects and challenges. Journal of Politics &
Administration, 1(1), 105–118.
Brown, D. (2005). Electronic government and public administration. International Review of
Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 241–254.
Cochran, J. (2008). Kazakhstan’s potential for wind and concentrated solar power. KIMEP Working
Cummings, S. (2005). Kazakhstan: Power and elite. London: I.B. Tauris.
egov magazine. (2007). Interview with Kuanishbek Esekeev, Chairman, Agency for Informatization and
last accessed March 27, 2008.
ESCAP. (2008). Economic and social survey of Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from: www.kazakhemb.
org.il, last accessed November 18, 2008.
Gleason, G. (1997). Prospects for Kazakhstan’s asian liberalism. Democratization, 5(3), 376–385.
Haldenwang, C. (2004). Electronic Government (E-Government) and development. The European Journal
of Development Research, 16(2), 417–432.
Haque, M. S. (2002). E-Governance in India: its impact on relations among citizens, politicians and public
Hasse, D. (2002). E-Government: The future of federal and municipal institution. An unpublished
Heeks, R. 2001. Understanding e-governance for development. i-Government Working Paper Series.
Heeks, R. (1998). Information technology and public sector corruption. Information System and Public
Sector Management Working Paper Series
Ho, A. T.-K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the E-government initiative. Public
Administration Review, 62(4), 434–443.
Holliday, I. (2002). Building e-government in East and Southeast Asia: regional rhetoric and national (In)
Holliday, I., & Yep, R. (2005). E-Government in China. Public Administration and Development, 25, 239–
Hossain, F. (2005). E-governance initiatives in developing countries: helping the rich? or, creating
opportunities for the poor? Asian Affairs, 27(4), 5–23.
Iqbal, H. (2007). Democracy and Central Asian states. Regional Studies, 4, 66–95.
ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (2004). ITU Data. Available at: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/
ict/statistics/at_glance/main04.pdf, last accessed November 5, 2008.
Jho, W. (2005). Challenges for e-governance: protests from civil society on the protection of privacy in egovernment in Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1), 151–166.
Kabir, A. (2008). Discourse on e-governance: Bottomline. The Daily Star. November 14. Retrieved from:
http://www.thedailystar.net/pf_story.php?nid=63243, last accessed November 14, 2008.
Keesing Record of World Events. (2005). Kazakhstan presidential elections. December.
Knox, C. (2008). Kazakhstan: modernizing government in the context of political inertia. International
Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(3), 477–496.
Makhmutova, M. (2001). Local government in Kazakhstan. In Igor Munteanu & Popa Victor (Eds.).
October 7, 2008.
Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Lazer, D. (2007). From Electronic Government to Information Society. In V.
Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality? Public
Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.
Netchaeva, I. (2002). E-government and E-democracy. The International Communication Gazette, 64(5),
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide? civic engagement, information poverty and the internet in the democratic
Perlman, B. J., & Gleason, G. (2007). Cultural determinism versus administrative logic: Asian values and
administrative reform in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan
Robinson, A. (2001). Geopolitics and oil focus the spotlight on Central Asia. Financial Times Survey.
Salem, F. (2006). Exploring e-government barriers in the Arab States. Policy Brief. No. 2. Dubai: Dubai
School of Government.
Sharma, T. (2002). E-governance: process reengineering approach. Indian Journal of Public Administration,
Tandon, H. (2005). e-governance: an Indian perspective. Policy & Society, 24(3), 1–28.
Transparency International. (2008). Corruption perception index 1999–2008 (Kazakhstan). Available at:
http://www.transparencykazakhstan.org/eng/content/8.html, last accessed January 7, 2009.
Transparency International. (2006). Global country report, 2006 [Kazakhstan], pp.184–188. Available at:
www.transparency.org/publications, last accessed November 18, 2008.
UN (United Nations). (2008). United Nations e-government survey 2008: From e-government to
United Nations/American Society for Public Administration [UN/ASPA]. (2002). Benchmarking egovernment: A global perspective: Assessing the progress of the UN member states. NY: UN/ASPA.
UNDP (United Nations Development Program). (2007). Human development report 2007/2008
last accessed November 13, 2008.
UNDP. (2001). Human development report 2001: Making new technologies work for human development.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document