Preview

Double Jeopardy - the 5th Amendment Essay Example

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1191 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Double Jeopardy - the 5th Amendment Essay Example
Constitutional Law
Unit 8: Double Jeopardy
Jesely Rojas
July 13th, 2010

“The 5th Amendment is an old friend and a good friend, one of the great landmarks in men's struggle to be free of tyranny, to be decent and civilized.”
William O. Douglas

Prepare a paper analyzing why, under certain circumstances, two state trials in two different states for the murder of the same person will not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Also, analyze why, under certain circumstances, a state trial and a federal trial may be held for the murder of the same person without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. As part of this assignment, you should conduct legal research to support your analysis of the concept of Double Jeopardy.
Using the legal research tool Lexis, as available through Kaplan University, complete the assignment and provide your instructor with a detailed description of your search terms, techniques and results. With your submission, include a list of all Boolean search terms, or natural language searches, utilized to complete this assignment. The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment states, no person shall "be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." Not only does the Double Jeopardy Clause defend individuals from being put in jeopardy of life or limb, but it also protects against other punishments such as monetary fines and prison terms. The Fifth Amendment discusses – among other issues – legal protocol as it relates to persons who are suspected, accused, or formally charged in relation to commission of a crime. It does not protect a person from being tried by two or more separate governments. Thus, both the federal government and the state government are able to charge and prosecute one person for the same criminal act, which is often the case for drug related crimes. As well, two or more states can prosecute and try a person for the same

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Content: Student located three different secondary sources on given legal issue. Student provided proper citation for each source. Student provided a summary of each secondary source and explained why the source was helpful. This section of the grading rubric counts up to 30 points.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fifth Amendment is protection against self incrimination; "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Quiz Chapter 1

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A clause to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments that says no person shall be deprived of "life, liberty or property" without due process of the law. Page 118…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "The history of liberty has largely been the history of observance of procedural safeguards." We agree with this quote because our country is based on the right to have our guaranteed protection of life, liberty and property. Two of the greatest procedural guarantees that insure liberty are the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. According to the Fifth Amendment, a capital crime is punishable by death, while an infamous crime is punishable by death or imprisonment. This amendment guarantees that no one has to stand trial for such a federal crime unless indicted by a grand jury. Further, a person cannot be put in double jeopardy for the same offense by the same government. The amendment also guarantees that a person cannot be forced to testify against himself, and forbids the government from taking a person's…

    • 2354 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    159). The issues with the Double Jeopardy Clause is that the clause does not prevent the possibility that a single criminal act may lead to more than one prosecution. "One criminal act can produce several statutory violations. But a single criminal act with multiple victims could result in several prosecutions because the identity of each victim would be an additional fact or element of proof in each case” (Mallor et al., 2015, pg.159). Also, the Double Jeopardy Clause “does not bar a private plaintiff from pursuing a civil case” (Mallor et al., 2015,…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution provides the highest level of law in the United States. The first ten amendments of the Constitution make up the Bill of Rights and within this, there are several rights that an accused person may exercise before, during and after a criminal trial. The Fifth Amendment states a defendant has the right to remain silent and cannot be forced to testify against himself. The Fifth Amendment also covers against double-jeopardy. The accused cannot be charged for the same crime, twice.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Crucible Symbolism

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page

    people would attempt to get out of questioning by pleading the 5th Amendment. In any…

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5th Amendment

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hi I am Lester Walker and I will be explaining to you which Amendment from the Bill of Rights I think is most important in today’s society. Personally I think Amendment 5 is the most important one because it’s still racism going on throughout the United States and in some places they would seriously punish an African American male or female for small crimes just because of the color of their skin. I think it’s unfair because I thought everyone were created equally to the same rights and no person was better than one another. So accusing someone of a capital crime is unlawful and the 5th Amendment put a stop to it.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a defendant cannot "be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Meaning, the…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fifth Amendment

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1966, there was a supreme case called Miranda v. Arizona which the Supreme Court ruled that the fifth amendment privilege againest self incrimination requires law enforcement to advise a suspect that before a custodial interrigation, a suspect must be informed of both his or her privileges against incriminating oneself and to obtain an attorney. Miranda warnings must be given before any questioning by law enforcement officials.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Right to Counsel

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The provisions of the 5th Amendment read, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation,” ("Fifth amendment: an," n.d. para 1). To this end, offenders plead the 5th Amendment when the choice is made that answering such questions would result in self-incrimination in regards to the charges at hand. This strategy allows the offender to be questioned by their own legal counsel while still retaining the ability to choose not to answer cross examination questions that may make verifiable proof of connection to the charge. Using such tactics can be as beneficial as it is damaging. Juries like to be able to hear from the accused, listen to what they have to say, and watch their body language. Refusing to take the stand in their own defense raises questions as to their guilt or innocence, even though it is the evidence they are required to follow.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legal principle established by the exclusionary rule is embodied in the United States of America Constitution and relates to the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Fourth Amendment protects the people by prohibiting illegal searches and seizures. The Fourteenth Amendment ensures offenders are afforded their rights to due process in a criminal trial according to the law. The exclusionary rule also applies to the Fifth Amendment, which protect the people against self incrimination when charged with an offense by a government officer. Furthermore, the rule applies to interrogations where the offender is often pressured by officers to confess to their crimes. In turn, the rule also applies to the Sixth Amendment that ensures every offender has the right to have legal counsel. Ultimately, the rule greatly influences the credibility of any evidence gathered, by government officers, for use in the prosecution of an accused offender. If the evidence presented to the court is found to have been collected in violation of the rule it may be suppressed in any federal or state court.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jennings vs. Armington

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fifth Amendment states, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation..” (Legal Dictionary, 2013) The way it is seen in the courts, the Double Jeopardy Clause applies only to legal proceedings brought by state and federal governments in criminal court and it will not apply to civil tort suits individuals bring forth in civil court.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Robbins Collections School of Law University of California at Berkley. (n.d.). The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Retrieved from http://www.berkley.edu…

    • 1862 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays