Preview

Death Penalty Pros and Cons Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
904 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty Pros and Cons Essay Example
Two Completely Different Views on the Death Penalty

These are the feelings that Amnesty International USA has toward the death penalty: They believe that the death penalty is the ultimate and irreversible denial of human rights. By working toward the abolition of the death penalty worldwide, Amnesty International USA's Program to Abolish the Death Penalty looked to discontinue the cycle of violence created by a system consumed with economic and racial bias and corrupted by human error. The death penalty is a violation of human rights. More than half the countries in the world have now abolished the death penalty in law or practice. The USA is executing criminals who have been diagnosed with mental illness. In 1986, in Ford v Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that the execution of the insane violates the Constitution's ban on "cruel and unusual punishments." It is impossible to know how many of those executed suffered from mental problems, but estimates go as far as 10%. The execution of those with mental illness is clearly forbidden by law in literally every country in the world. Despite these standards, the USA continues to execute people with clinically-labeled mental illnesses. Another reason Amnesty is against the death penalty is because, it can claims the lives of innocent people. Since 1973, more than 115 people have been released from death rows throughout the country due to evidence of their wrongful convictions. Just in 2003 alone, 10 innocent defendants were released from death row. Some factors that can lead to wrongful convictions are: inadequate legal representation, police and prosecutorial misconduct, perjured testimony and mistaken eyewitness testimony, racial prejudice, jailhouse snitch testimony, suppression and/or misinterpretation of mitigating evidence, and community/political pressure to solve a case. All these factors can lead to the killings of many innocent people in the USA. There are numerous more reasons why

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The debate over whether or not capital punishment should be used has gone on for thousands of years. Although the method of capital punishment has changed the idea of it has not. Capital punishment will always have its disadvantages and its advantages. There has always been an intense debate among the people regarding the constitutionality of capital punishment. In my opinion, capital punishment should only be used in harsh cases that the convicted person is proven guilty in.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are not many absolute truths in the world. Almost every point can be argued and justified. But if there is one truth universally recognized, one truth upon which societies the world over have been based on, it is that murder is wrong. The willful termination of a life is immoral. If we as a society accept that to be true, how then can we condone the death penalty? How is government sanctioned murder a moral option? The legal system is not fool proof, nothing man-made is. How then can we claim that an imperfect court of law, pervious to human error and persuasion, has the power to lay down the most perfectly irreversible solution of them all: death. Even after the appellate courts have been exhausted, it is possible for an innocent person to be convicted of a crime they did not do. If there is even that small possibility, how can we, in all good conscious, make it legal to put someone to…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you know how many people die in Canada every year . Over 500 people die from Murder every year. This is a very high rate since Canada's population is very small. The capital punishment of death penalty has a very clear connection with homicide rates. I think the death penalty should be legal in Canada. Since so many people are getting murdered and so many heinous criminals have the courage to kill someone they should get a taste of their own medicine and should be killed as brutally as they killed their victim. The death penalty should also be legal because it's cheaper than keeping people in prison for 25 years . It also gives fear to people who would want to commit heinous crimes because they will…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retribution is the theory that the mandate to pay an offender back for his or her wrongdoing (pg. 6 Cullen). Conservatives lean in favor of this approach while liberals favor what is called “just deserts.” The difference between the two is that retribution is has the goal of ensuring that the offender endures the pain they have caused. Just desert want the offender to suffer no more than the pain caused. They wish to see that justice is served but not more than that which is truly deserved. One punishment that is considered retribution rather than rehabilitative is the death penalty. The argument that this punishment is more retribution is that the offender should suffer the same harm to which his or her inflicted on the victim. They see the…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas and the Death Penalty

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Putting people to death for breaking the law is a punishment that has been in existence for thousands of years of human history and has been enforced in all corners of the world by different societies. Capital punishment has become a very controversial subject that is widely accepted by some people and harshly protested by others especially in today’s American society where differences in opinion about subjects such as this are as broad and complicated as the legal information and research information that has been published about it. This is also one of those subjects where it is impossible, because of these differences for there to be any sort of universal agreement among law makers, law breakers, conforming citizens, communities and societies because it involves punishment by the decision of taking or sparing of a human life.…

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic in America, and people usually shy away from it, but speaking about controversial topics can help us come close to actually find solutions. This exercise was conducted in my survey of law class in which, we had gone over several homicide cases in which the criminal received the death penalty. In the end of the lesson, our teacher asked a simple question “raise your hand if you believe in the death penalty”. I was appalled to see that more than half believed it was worth it. In my mind it was clear that even though that person could have murdered another human being, we have no jurisdiction to kill them, and we would be no better as civilized being if we killed him.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is viewed as a political viewpoint that has pro’s and con’s by the American people. Capital punishment is known as the “The Death Penalty” and is identified as the premeditated and planned taking of a human life. The government views this as a response to a crime committed by a legally convicted person. The question is The Death Penalty just and applied fairly? The argument against Capital punishment can include the following; Amnesty International, who believes that “The Death Penalty” is the cruelest denial of human, rights (White, 2009). The pro’s state that, “Capital punishment gives society the right and duty to protect the innocent in self-defense.” The Death Penalty gives closure to the victim’s families who have suffered so much. Some families may never recover from the cruelty of the crime, and most families just want closure. Most Americans and people from different countries such as; china, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan agree with capital punishment. White stated, “I believe that it sends the wrong message: Killing people who kill people to show killing is wrong (White, 2009). Therefore, is it just and applied fairly is the question that is asked, should we kill because some kill? I believe that we are sending a message to promote killing, is it fair for some and not for others.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A sixteen- year-old is prosecuted in adult court and is given the life sentence without any chance at parole. He doesn’t understand what is happening. His brain isn’t developed like any adults, nor does her comprehend the court surroundings. He is practically a victim to the justice system as he is being treated the same as a thirty-year-old criminal. Any offender under the age of twenty-one should be separated from adults in the justice system.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: 1) 'Simply Living ' Vol.4 No.4 1989, 'The Green Pages: Amnesty International, Campaign to abolish the death penalty '…

    • 745 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty in general is very controversial on whether it should actually still take place or not. The “Death Penalty” by David Bruck was originally printed on May 20, 1985 in the New Republic. David Bruck is focusing on how to accomplish justice without using the electric chair or lynching. He uses ethos but mainly pathos appeal to argue his point. Frank Keating has a completely different idea on this matter. His article “Why I Support Capital Punishment” was published in 2000 by Human Events Publishing. He discusses all his opinions on why the death penalty should occur, while defending his state on capital punishment. To argue his opinions on executing someone he uses ethos and logos appeal. David Bruck’s claims are more effective than Frank Keating’s solely because he is able to appeal to the reader’s emotions.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    capital punishment

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Amnesty International, “The death penalty legitimizes an irreversible act of violence by the state and will inevitably claim innocent victims.” If there is any chance that error is possible (which ­there always is), the drastic measure of capital ­punishment should not be taken. Also, it is too final, meaning it does not allow opportunity for th accused to be proven innocent, a violation of the Fifth Amendment which guarantees due process of law.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We must keep in mind that this is a serious matter; we are dealing with human beings! An error rate has been proven, anything with an error rate; killing innocent people, needs to be killed as an idea! Furthermore, if the death penalty is not abolished, it will continue to waste our tax dollars & open the doors for more innocence to be executed!…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently there has been a major controversy about whether to keep the death penalty or to dispose of it. A portion of the world’s population supports the death penalty, while others frown upon it. The death penalty helps the government prevent deaths, costs taxpayers less, and provides assistance to those who do not wish to live through their rough feelings. Though keeping the penalty does have its consequences, the lengthy list of pros overpowers the cons.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays