Preview

criminal justice fundamentals

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1280 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
criminal justice fundamentals
1. What is the difference between retribution model of punishment and the utilitarian justification for punishment? The retributive justification for punishment focuses on what the offender deserves as a result of his or her criminal behavior and the utilitarian focus on the future criminal behavior of both the person being punished and other members of society.
2. What is retroactive justice? Utilitarian justification of punishment that views punishment as a means to repair the harm and injury caused by the crime and focuses on the victim and the community as well as the offender.
3. What is retribution? The amount of punishment imposed on the offender should equal the amount of harm done by the offender the punishment should be proportional to the seriousness of the crime and by the culpability of the offender.
4. What is a byfarquey trial?
5. What is a mandatory sentence? The minimum jail or prison sentence that must be imposed of an offender convicted of a particular type of crime especially common for drug offenses involving use of a weapon.
6. What is the most important factor in determining a sentence? Is the fixed term sentence that may be reduced if the offender behaves himself or herself while incarcerated, the offenders date of release is based on the sentence imposed minus any good time credits.
7. When fines are allocated in usually and conjunction with other kind of punishment? In intermediated sanctions.
8. Are judges allowed to punish repeated offenders harder than first offenders? Yes judges are allowed to punish harder those individuals.
9. What are intermediate sanctions? Are more severe than probation but less severe than a prison sentences example boot camps, house arrest, etc.
10. What are the 4 utilitarian justifications for punishment? Deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation and specific deterrence
11. In the case Furman V Georgia (1972)? The court ruled that the death penalty as it was administered under the existing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Two main purposes: Retribution & Prevention. Retribution looks back to past crimes and punishes individuals for committing them, because it’s right to hurt them. Prevention looks forward and inflicts pain, not for its own sake, but to prevent future crimes. There are four kinds: General deterrence, Special deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When retribution is fulfilled justice is better served. The most fundamental belief of justice is that the…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory of punishment can be divided into two concepts: the Utilitarian and Retributive. Utilitarian theory of punishment to discourage criminal behaviors someone attempts to punish the perpetrators, or " shock and awe”, the future wrong behavior. Retribution theory attempts to punish the perpetrators because they should be punished.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Retributive justice is when you violate the rights of another; then you should be penalized. These punishments restore order in the community. When offenders not getting punished, then there is an unbalance in society and guilt is now placed on the policy makers. Retributive justice becomes an issue when the individual committing the offenses is a victim as well. This person has been affected by outside entities, therefore lacks moral fiber, and will not endanger the rest of the community. Utilitarian justification has been the model for the American justice system for the most of the twentieth century. It utilizes different strategies for punishment, one being general deterrence. The knowledge of the penalty to follow the crime will reduce the violations. Individuals observed the consequences through another offender, who has committed a violation of rules and therefore are not interested in criminal…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    d. Theory of Retributivism: look back at the harm and calibrate the punishment to the crime…

    • 11795 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that retribution should be the foremost goal of the criminal justice system in the United States today because of its perspective of “an eye for an eye”. Retribution is a theory that states that people should be punished for that crime that they have committed equally to what they have done (396). It is not like the other two goals of punishment, which is deterrence and rehabilitation that does not make much of an impact on criminals we see today. Deterrence has many problems that arise with it and is not very affective, such as a criminal would commit the crime again in knowing the severity of the time, cost, and if they would even get caught doing so (339). Furthermore, in the case of rehabilitation only 35% of criminals…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Retribution, in the form of capital punishment is the execution of the criminal in vengeance for the victim and their families. This ideology is flawed, out dated and irrelevant in today’s civilisation.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Restorative Justice Theory focuses on the needs of the victim and the rehabilitation of the offender through reconciliation in conjunction with victims and society; on the other hand, Retributive Justice theory focuses rather on retribution and punishment of offenders obtaining justice for the victims and to society.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penal

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Retribution is another area that can be viewed when discussing the pros and cons of the death penalty. You have those people who feel that the punishment should fit the crime so therefore, if you kill someone then you should be killed. This is also known as eye for an eye. Retribution can also be seen as a form of revenge for those who oppose the death penalty.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some proponents of capital punishment believe that the death penalty is justified because it is a form of retributive justice, where the criminal deserves to die because he has committed an equally horrendous act such as murder or rape. In my opinion, the concept of “retributive punishment” is merely a euphemism for the primal desire of revenge. Two wrongs does not make a right – executing the offender will not revive the victim, nor will it benefit society in any way. Individuals seeking to dish out…

    • 1026 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main idea of punishment using the idea of utilitarianism is that punishment should be created solely for the reason of deterrence. There are two different levels of deterrence, and they are specific…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the retribution goal the punishment is imposed by a sentencing judge. It is intentionally given as way to get back at the offender and offer some closure to the victim. The offender is given notice and an attorney is made available. The punishment to the offense is thought to be equal to the offense. Punishment is imposed to the offender in the form of a fine, imprisonment or probation. As a result the offender can spend a good part of their life in prison. Penalties are not sought for their own sake, because this is not the era of retribution; rather they are meant to be corrective by being conducive either to the reform of the sinner or to the good of society, which becomes more peaceful through the punishment of sinners (Mahoney, 2007).…

    • 653 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The second is retribution; this means that they punishment needs to fit the crime. A judge will not sentence someone to five years for a traffic violation and give a convicted murder just a few days. Judges need to take into account the full impact the crime had on everyone.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retribution is the theory that the mandate to pay an offender back for his or her wrongdoing (pg. 6 Cullen). Conservatives lean in favor of this approach while liberals favor what is called “just deserts.” The difference between the two is that retribution is has the goal of ensuring that the offender endures the pain they have caused. Just desert want the offender to suffer no more than the pain caused. They wish to see that justice is served but not more than that which is truly deserved. One punishment that is considered retribution rather than rehabilitative is the death penalty. The argument that this punishment is more retribution is that the offender should suffer the same harm to which his or her inflicted on the victim. They see the…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goals Of Sentencing

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The sentencing phase of the criminal justice process is where a guilty offender is sanctioned for his conduct. The goals of sentencing include retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation. Historically the primary goal has varied by criminal justice era and the crime committed. However, each sentencing goal has a specific purpose (Masters, et al., 2017). The sentencing goal of retribution is normally pursued in heinous crime cases. Its aim is to castigate the offender. In contrast, rehabilitation is a sentencing goal that seeks to correct offender conduct, by teaching offenders, skills that aid in the prevention of recidivism. On the other hand, the sentencing goal of deterrence seeks to discourage future criminality by way of…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays