Constitution Comparison Essay Example
Constitution Comparison
By AntiYuke
I compared the U.S.A. constitution and the Australian constitution. Their differences are as abundant as their similarities. The Australian constitution is extremely long and drawn out, where as the United States constitution sticks right to the point. All in all, the two constitutions have the same goal in that they wish to bestow the same basic rights to each person. The two constitutions both have a preamble, however the Australian constitution is many more times greater in length. They both state how the power is bestowed on the federal government, but the power from each comes from different places. Australian takes it from the Queen, where USA takes it from the people, displaying how the separation from the British Empire by the Australians was more peace oriented than the rebellion of the United States. The Australian preamble doesn't deal with legitimacy to USA standards because it doesn't state the reasons for its creation where USA simply states, "in order to form a more perfect union." The Australian preamble sis redundant in that it states things in it that are restated later in the body of the constitution.
Both constitutions are segmented into powers bestowed upon branches or states and other important agendas. The US calls their segments articles, and the Australians call theirs chapters. The basic framework of the two is basically the same in that universally the first three deal with the Federal Government in the same order: Parliament (Australia)/Legislature (US), the Executive Government (Aust.)/Executive Branch (US), and the Judicature (Aust.)/Judicial Branch (US). Again both the US constitution and the Aust. Constitution have segments dedicated to state powers and alteration; however the Aust. Constitution goes further by dealing specifically with "Finance quel Tracle" and "Miscellaneous."
Under the US Constitution our legislature is a bicameral containing a House of Representatives
By AntiYuke
I compared the U.S.A. constitution and the Australian constitution. Their differences are as abundant as their similarities. The Australian constitution is extremely long and drawn out, where as the United States constitution sticks right to the point. All in all, the two constitutions have the same goal in that they wish to bestow the same basic rights to each person. The two constitutions both have a preamble, however the Australian constitution is many more times greater in length. They both state how the power is bestowed on the federal government, but the power from each comes from different places. Australian takes it from the Queen, where USA takes it from the people, displaying how the separation from the British Empire by the Australians was more peace oriented than the rebellion of the United States. The Australian preamble doesn't deal with legitimacy to USA standards because it doesn't state the reasons for its creation where USA simply states, "in order to form a more perfect union." The Australian preamble sis redundant in that it states things in it that are restated later in the body of the constitution.
Both constitutions are segmented into powers bestowed upon branches or states and other important agendas. The US calls their segments articles, and the Australians call theirs chapters. The basic framework of the two is basically the same in that universally the first three deal with the Federal Government in the same order: Parliament (Australia)/Legislature (US), the Executive Government (Aust.)/Executive Branch (US), and the Judicature (Aust.)/Judicial Branch (US). Again both the US constitution and the Aust. Constitution have segments dedicated to state powers and alteration; however the Aust. Constitution goes further by dealing specifically with "Finance quel Tracle" and "Miscellaneous."
Under the US Constitution our legislature is a bicameral containing a House of Representatives