Preview

Cases Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7988 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cases Study
Malayan Law Journal Reports/1966/Volume 2/STEPHEN KALONG NINGKAN v TUN ABANG HAJI OPENG AND TAWI SLI - [1966] 2 MLJ 187 - 7 September 1966

8 pages

[1966] 2 MLJ 187

STEPHEN KALONG NINGKAN v TUN ABANG HAJI OPENG AND TAWI SLI

OCJ
HARLEY AGCJ (BORNEO)
KUCHING CIVIL SUIT NO K 45 OF 1966
7 September 1966

Constitutional Law -- Constitution of the State of Sarawak, Articles 1, 5, 6, 7, 10, 24 and 44 -- Whether Governor has power to dismiss Chief Minister -- Allegation that Chief Minister has ceased to command the confidence of majority in Council Negri -- Lack of confidence may be demonstrated only by vote in Coucil Negri.

Article 6(3) of the Constitution of the State of Sarawak gives power to the Governor to appoint as Chief Minister a member of the Council Negri who in his judgment is likely to command the confidence of a majority of the members of the Council Negri; while Article 7(1) provides that if the Chief Minister ceases to command the confidence of a majority of the members of the Council Negri, then unless at his request the Governor dissolves the Council Negri the Chief Minister shall tender the resignation of the members of the Supreme Council.
On the 16th June 1966, the Governor of Sarawak (the first defendant) received a letter signed by 21 members of the Council Negri to the effect that the writers had no longer any confidence in the plaintiff, their Chief Minister. The Governor thereupon wrote and informed the plaintiff on the 16th June that from representations he had received he was satisfied that the plaintiff had ceased to command the confidence of the Council Negri and invited the plaintiff to resign. The plaintiff in his reply of the 17th June informed the Governor that the Governor's views as to the loss of confidence of the members of the Council Negri in the plaintiff was not supported by the meeting of the Council Negri held on the 14th June and the plaintiff in the same letter requested that he be supplied with the names

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Trespass to person

    • 2470 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Norchaya Talib, Law of Tort in Malaysia (3rd edn, Sweet & Maxwell Asia, Kuala Lumpur 2006)…

    • 2470 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is true that delegated legislation is a common phenomenon in almost all the countries of the world, but the extent to which such power of law making can be delegated is a question of concern. As the Committee on Ministers Powers recommended that the enabling or skeletal legislation which contains only basic principles and which leaves the details to be provided by delegated legislation, should be exceptional. Under those circumstances, where it becomes extremely inevitable to delegate, the methods for its control should also be provided so as to prevent the delegated authorities from abusing the law making power or from exceeding the limits provided by the enabling legislation. Usurping the role of the legislators cannot be permitted as there can be no parallel law making body to that of the Parliament or of the State Legislatures. Thus, an important issue arises as to where the…

    • 6376 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Applied Management Project

    • 13570 Words
    • 55 Pages

    17. Tsang (1999), “Law society Gazette-Focus ' '. Available at www.lawgazette.co.uk/archives/1999-10-08/00000012.html, (Accessed: 27th July, 2010)…

    • 13570 Words
    • 55 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Evidence Rule

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Administrative Law, Trimester 2, 2012 Assignment Question „[The] statutory “no evidence” ground of judicial review is both wider and more specific than was the case with “no evidence” grounds for judicial review at common law.‟ Justice Kirby, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2002] 210 CLR 222, at [111]. Of the judgments in Rajamanikkam, which do you prefer, and what justification can you provide for your preference? In answering the question, you should read the following three prescribed cases. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam (2002) 210 CLR 222 Television Capricornia Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1986) 13 FCR 511 SGFB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) FCAFC 422 You may, however, also choose to read the following supplementary reading. The supplementary reading consists of the following three cases. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 Sunchen Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2010) FCA 21 The supplementary reading also consists of the following article. Andrew Pinchin, ‘No Evidence’ and ‘Mistake of Fact’: A Reconsideration (2007) 55 AIAL Forum 59-85 This supplementary reading might assist your understanding, but students will not be penalised for not referring to it, nor rewarded for referring to it. The focus should be on the prescribed reading for the assignment. As this is a reflective and not a research essay, you should not refer to material outside the prescribed and supplementary reading. You should follow the advice below, but also the advice given in the Study Guide on the assignment. Note especially the reference to penalties if the 1500 word limit is exceeded. You should also follow any further advice on the question provided in lecture notes. Some advice on the assignment The question requires students to reflect on primary material, rather than merely…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3 Levels of Government

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Has authority over external affairs, defence, internal security, justice (except civil law cases among Malays and other indigenous peoples, adjudicated under Islamic and traditional law), federal citizenship, finance, commerce, industry, communications, transportation and other matters etc as stated in the Ninth Schedule (List 1) if the Federal constitution.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the common law replaced the Malay-Muslim law as the basic law, the country has exercised the doctrine of the constitutional supremacy. Unlike Malaysia, the British constitution isn’t the supreme law of the land; instead they practice the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy. The doctrine however is important for several reasons. Firstly is that one should appreciate the constitution to differentiate the Malaysian constitutional system than the British constitutional system. Even though the country’s constitutional and legal institutions have been modeled along the British’s style, the notion of constitutional supremacy does not form the basic foundations in the latter institution. Unlike Malaysia, the British constitution isn’t the supreme law of the land; instead they practice the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy. And secondly, many implications sprout from the notion of constitutional supremacy and these are very vital from the different opinions of constitutional work.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soliven/Beltran V Makasiar

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    vs. THE HON. RAMON P. MAKASIAR, Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Manila, Branch 35, UNDERSECRETARY SILVESTRE BELLO III, of the Department of Justice, LUIS C. VICTOR, THE CITY FISCAL OF MANILA and PRESIDENT CORAZON C. AQUINO, respondents.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    W hether the resp. ’s refusal was well founded. W hich in turn depended on whether the statute passed in England in1824 is also applicable in Penang by virtue of the Charter of Justice. the S.S by the 2nd Charter had superseded the previous law.…

    • 6658 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Judiciary, except for Syariah Courts and the courts in Sabah and Sarawak, comprises of judges appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. The judges have to act independently and may not be removed from office before the compulsory retiring age of 65; except on the recommendation of a tribunal consisting of at least five judges and ex-judges. Under the constitution, they are empowered to interpret the Articles of the constitution. They also have power to declare any laws to be invalid or any executive acts to be unlawful.…

    • 3669 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judicial decisions

    • 1828 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Different countries practices difference types of legal system. Some country practices one type of legal system while other practices the mixed legal system which means a combination of two or more legal systems. Malaysia for example, practices the mixed legal system which includes the common law (British law), Islamic law and customary law.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    - Premier must dissolve legislature if there is a vacancy in the office of premier and the legislature fails to elect a successor within 30 days.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Digest

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    NO, the decision of the CSC-CARAGA invalidating the appointment of Daligdig as Municipal Government Department Head I is not in order. Therefore the CSC granted the appeal of Mayor Lademora in pursuant to the Section 443 (d) of Republic Act No. 7160, where it is stated that the Sanggunian concerned shall act upon the appointment fifteen (15) days after the date of is submission, otherwise the appointment is deemed as valid. In the case of the appointment of Daligdig the Sangguniang Bayan issued its non-concurrence on August 10, 2005, whereas the appointment should have been resolved fifteen (15) days…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    arabic letters

    • 4270 Words
    • 18 Pages

    NENG “KAGUI KADIGUIA” MALANG, petitioner, vs. HON. COROCOY MOSON, Presiding Judge of 5th Shari’a District Court, Cotabato City, HADJI MOHAMMAD ULYSSIS MALANG, HADJI ISMAEL MALINDATU MALANG, FATIMA MALANG, DATULNA MALANG, LAWANBAI MALANG, JUBAIDA KADO MALANG, NAYO OMAL MALANG and MABAY GANAP MALANG, respondents.…

    • 4270 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arfah Jasmi

    • 4881 Words
    • 13 Pages

    [1] This is my judgment in respect of the prosecution 's appeal against inadequacy of sentence passed by learned sessions judge. The accused was not represented here and the court below.…

    • 4881 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Peter A Williams QC, Judicial Misconduct, Pelanduk Publications, 1990 2. Kevin YL Tan, TM Yeo & KS Lee, Constitutional Law in Malaysia and Singapore, Malayan Law Journal Publications, 1991 3. HP Lee, Constitutional Conflicts in Contemporary Malaysia, Oxford University Press, 1995 4. Poh-Ling Tan (ed), Asian Legal Systems, Butterworths, 1997 5. Sharifah Suhana Ahmad, Malaysian Legal System, Malayan Law Journal Publications, 1999 6. Peter de Cruz, Comparative Law in a Changing World, 2nd ed, Cavendish Publishing, 1999 7. S Joseph & M Castan, Federal Constitutional Law: A Contemporary View, Lawbook Co., 2001 8. Suri Ratnapala, Australian Constitutional Law: Foundations and Theory, Oxford University Press, 2002 9. G Hassall & C Saunders, Asia-Pacific Constitutional Systems, Cambridge University Press, 2002 10. Bede Harris, A New Constitution for Australia, Cavendish Publishing, 2002 11. RA Hughes, GWG Leane & A Clarke, Australian Legal Institutions: Principles, Structure and Organisation, Lawbook Company, 2003 12. Bede Harris, Essential Constitutional Law, 2nd ed, Cavendish Publishing, 2004 13. Sir Gerard Brennan, ‘Judicial Independence’, The Australian Judicial Conference, Canberra, 2 November 1996 14. Justice Michael Kirby, ‘Attacks on Judges- A Universal Phenomenon’, American Bar Association section of litigation winter leadership meeting, Hawaii, 5 January 1998 15. Justice Michael Kirby, ‘Independence of the Judiciary- Basic Principle, New Challenges’, International Bar Association Human Rights Institute Conference, Hong Kong, 12-14 June 1998 16. Justice Michael Kirby, ‘Courts & Politics: Judicial Independence- Summing Up’, Yale Global Constitutionalism Seminar, Yale Law School, 16 September 2000 17. Justice Michael Kirby, ‘The Challenges to Justice in a Plural Society’, Commonwealth Lawyers’ Association Judicial Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 4 April 2002 18.…

    • 6522 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays