Preview

Case Questions Chapter 4, Legal Environment of Business Management Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
759 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Questions Chapter 4, Legal Environment of Business Management Essay Example
Case Questions
1. Many states prohibit their lottery tickets from being sold out of the state, so Pic-A-State would have it agent buy lottery tickets in various states and hold them there; someone in Pennsylvania would buy a claim on the tickets held in the other states. Congress passed a law prohibiting interstate transmission of lottery ticket information to be used for lottery ticket sales. Pic-A-State, which was being put out of business, challenged the law as unconstitutional. Was this correct?
Pic-A-State Inc.’s challenge stating that the law Congress passed prohibiting interstate transmission of lottery ticket information to be used for lottery ticket sale was unconstitutional is not correct. As per out text, the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution provides that “Congress shall have Power… To regulate commerce with foreign Nations, and amount the several states...” Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce that includes transmission of information by computer for purchasing lottery tickets. Although Pic-A-State did not transport actual lottery tickets across state lines, but only sold interest in lottery tickets via computer, their activity may still be regulated by Congress. Congress has acted under their constitutional exercise and power to legislate under the Commerce Clause. This law has protected the state lottery revenues, and preserving state sovereignty in the regulation of lotteries and interstate gambling.
2. Plaistow, New Hampshire, passed an ordinance prohibiting truck traffic during late-night hours at a truck terminal loading and unloading facility. It did so to reduce noise and fumes for the benefit of town residents. The truck terminal had been in operation several years. Most of the trucks came five miles from an interstate highway to change loads. The truckers contested the regulation as a restriction on interstate commerce and maintained that regulating an area (interstate trucking) subject to federal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Analysis: The state of Confusion follows passes both of the first two test. Their regulation does pursue a legitimate end. There is also rationale behind that end. However, the state of Confusion is putting a burden on the neighboring state of Washington. By limiting their granite to only the state of Confusion. Which is in violation of the Dormant Commerce Clause..Ron is from the state of Nevada. Bill is from the state of California. California and Nevada are different states. The amount in controversy is more than $100,000 which is more than the $75,000.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue with this case is that does it violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Which in short says that no other state has the…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 2003, the corporation North Carolina Right to Life, Inc. sued the federal Election Commission claiming that that two FEC regulations were unconstitutional.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Case 3-3

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should a party to a lawsuit have to hand over its confidential business secrets as part of a discovery request? Why or why not? What limitations might a court consider imposing before requiring ATC to produce this material?…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alex would be suing Betty for a breach of contract. He would only succeed if he’s able to prove that a contract was in place. A contract can be defined as “a written or spoken agreement that is intended to be enforceable by law.” In order for it to be formed, agreement must take place and it can be broken down into two elements. Firstly, an offer. This can be described as an expression of willingness to contract on clear terms, with the intention that it will become a binding contract when it has been accepted. The second is acceptance, which can be defined as the unqualified expression of assent to the terms of an offer.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In one situation, the state of New York granted Aaron Ogden an exclusive monopoly to operate his steamboat between New York and New Jersey. Ogden suddenly becomes aware that another individual, Thomas Gibbons, is operating along the same route. Afterwards, Ogden claimed that New York has not given Gibbons the rights to operate on that route. Gibbons, on the other hand, claimed that he had the rights to travel on that route because of an act passed by Congress dealing with coastal commerce. Ogden ended up suing, and the New York court stated that only Ogden can operate on the route. So, New York upheld the monopoly it issued to Ogden.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miller v. California

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The court ruled in favor of California. In a 5 to 4 decision, the main question the court faced was whether the sale of “obscene” material via mail protected by the First Amendment? The court decided that in this particular case, it was not…

    • 675 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matter of Mogharrabi

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421 (1987), the United States Supreme Court held that the "clear probability"…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V Ohio

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tanya could file suit in the federal district court, although she could file suit in a state court in Confusion. The statute is unconstitutional as it imposes an impermissible burden on interstate commerce and is comparable to an import duty to drive through the state that was prohibited with the adoption of the U.S. Constitution. The suit starts with a complaint alleging the unconstitutional nature of the statute based on the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution. Injunctive relief will be sought in the complaint and probably under a motion for preliminary injunction enjoining the enforcement of the statue. There would be an answer and responsive papers on the motion. The court would decide the motion. Preliminary…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 4 Quiz

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. The 1962 Supreme Court decision Engel v. Vitale ruled which of the following unconstitutional?…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Positives of Indian Gaming

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Indian gaming has endured and fought many battles to become legal in the United States. The concept of Indian gaming began with low stakes bingo on reservation land. Throughout the 1970s, dozens of tribes were using bingo to help their community (Pevar 319). Many tribes encountered legal battles within the states they were hosting profitable bingo halls. Such was the case for the Oneida in 1975, located in New York, which held a bingo fund raiser for the local fire department (Cuillier 202). The state claimed the game was illegal because the prizes offered by the tribe were over the limit of New York law (Cuillier 202). The Oneida argued that their status as a sovereign nation kept them from such limitations. Another case spurred up in Florida, alongside the Oneida case and both were under Supreme Court review. The Seminole Nation had established their own high-stakes bingo game in retrospect to the Oneida’s claim of sovereignty and they were shut down by the Florida state (Cuillier 203). The Seminole sued under the same premise as the Oneida. They argued that as a sovereign nation they were not regulated by state law. In 1976, the Supreme Court ruled that the states cannot have power of this situation and reaffirmed the right of sovereignty (Cuillier 203). This decision made dozens of other tribes to establish their own…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The potential customer never received any such prize or in some cases neither prize nor magazines. When this case went to trail the defendants tried to appeal the ruling of…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    eyes open to the blatant disregard of the Supreme Court’s decision of 1954 - outlawing…

    • 767 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law applied in this case was the act of state doctrine, which states, “local courts may not question the legal effect of a foreign state’s acts fully executed within its own territory” (US Legal, 2013). Therefore, the court dismissed the action against Metropolitan Museum of Art.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays