Preview

Brutus’ Decision Not to Kill Antony at the Time May Have Been Honourable but It Was Unwise in the Light of Things to Come. Brutus’ Honour and Nobility Initiated the Mistakes He Made That Led to His Tragic Downfall, Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1058 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Brutus’ Decision Not to Kill Antony at the Time May Have Been Honourable but It Was Unwise in the Light of Things to Come. Brutus’ Honour and Nobility Initiated the Mistakes He Made That Led to His Tragic Downfall, Essay Example
Brutus’ decision not to kill Antony at the time may have been honourable but it was unwise in the light of things to come. Brutus’ honour and nobility initiated the mistakes he made that led to his tragic downfall, sparing Antony’s life being the most detrimental.

The string that unravelled the drawback begins in the first scene of the second act where the naïve Brutus is swayed by Cassius and joins the conspiracy. The plot against Caesar is first devised by Cassius, who slowly allows Brutus to take over the arrangements. This is when Brutus’ oversights eventually lead him to his own demise. The question of whether or not to kill Antony is brought up amongst the conspirators, Brutus and Cassius disagree on the answer. Brutus does not see the threat in Antony, his naivety leads him to believe that everyone is noble and has good intentions in mind. He doesn't think people can be someone other than what they seem. This is shown with his strong opinion of Antony, "And for Mark Antony, think not of him; For he can do no more than Caesar's arm When Caesar's head is off." (Act II, Scene i, Line 181-183) This opinion is very far from the truth as is proven in the emotional speech Antony makes following Caesar's death. Cassius, on the other hand, was very much less trusting; he believed it would be best to kill Antony so that there would be no fear of retaliation from him. As a character, Cassius was usually suspicious of others and cautious to act for he was the first to declare Antony will bring the downfall of the conspirators saying, "A shrewd contriver; and you know his means, If he improve them, may well stretch so far As to annoy us all." (Act II, Scene i, Line159-161) He is also against letting Antony speak at Caesar's funeral before the citizens of Rome. His scepticism in Antony, but failure to act accordingly, turns out to be a key influence to the play's outc Brutus’ decision not to kill Antony at the time may have been honourable but it was unwise in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For instance, during the conspirators’ meeting in Brutus’ orchard, Cassius suggests that Marc Antony should be killed because his many connections and undying love for Julius Caesar threaten the scheme. However, Brutus opposes Cassius’ claim by stating that Antony is absolutely harmless because he will only lament after the death of his beloved friend, Caesar (II.i.157-191). Evidently, their quarrel develops the external conflict by showing Cassius and Brutus’ of their contribution to their regret and downfall on very important issues in the conspiracy. In addition, this affects the work as a whole because it develops the theme of fate versus free will by showing that Brutus chose not to kill Antony and that Cassius did not make a greater effort to change Brutus’ opinion. Later in the play, Cassius mentions that if Antony was condemned soon after Caesar was murdered, the battle at Philippi and the defeat of the conspiracy. The conflict between Brutus and Cassius shows that the Lens is correct because both men are ashamed that they spared Antony.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Roman's godlike worship of Caesar threatens the prominence of the Senate. To retain his dominance Mark Antony chooses to become a close ally to him. Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators however, plot Caesar’s demise. In the end, Mark Antony finds high esteem and the conspirators receive banishment and death. The play is an example, or maybe even a warning, that our actions and reactions have real effects. Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, and Cimber respond swiftly and without thought to Caesar’s rise and pay a heavy price for it in the end. Mark Antony sees the worth in being Caesar’s friend, and their friendship benefits him when Caesar is dead. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the principal characters' initial reactions to Caesar’s rise affect their conclusive outcomes.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    did not want him in the conspiracy is that he did not want competition for the…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The two Romans had very different morals. Brutus was an honorable man and said that he had never met a man that he did not trust. He was forgiving, but gullible and naive. This turned out to have bad results as far as whether or not Antony should live. If Antony were killed he could not have started the war. His qualities unlike Cassius', which were vengefulness and manipulative, made Cassius the better man for the job because he would have had Antony put to death. He was deceitful and had no problem lying to people, even Brutus. He was also plotting and suspicious which made for a very god military strategist.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassies Conspires

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, there are a few characters with great soliloquies, who have an extremely dramatic effect on the plot of the story. One of those characters happens to be Cassius, Caesar’s enemy. During Act I, scene ii, Cassius starts plotting against Caesar, as he is now the new leader of Rome. Although Cassius is the one going against Caesar, he manipulates Brutus, Caesar’s…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Incidentally, Brutus ends up at the conspirator’s house discussing how they are to kill Caesar. He makes many decisions here that hurt him later the first being that when Cassius wants them to take an oath of secrecy Brutus rejects that idea saying “What need we any spur but our own cause, to prick us to redress?” Artemidorus tries to give Caesar a list of the conspirators but Caesar fails to read it. The second mistake made at that house was the decision to not recruit Cecilia. He was a great speaker whose words could have swayed the crowd in the conspirators favor. Finally the last mistake made here was to not kill Antony. Brutus believes that "Antony is know your outward favor.” When Cassius says this Brutus begins to reconsider his standing with Caesar and slowly is convinced that Caesar being dead is for the good of Rome.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Body paragraph 1 Furthermore, Brutus, at the beginning of the play Julius Caesar, is presented as conflicted and torn. When Cassius first confronts Brutus about his plans to eliminate Caesar, Brutus feels like Cassius has picked the wrong man to complete this task, saying that what Cassius is looking for is, "not in me" (act1scene2) and that he is not "of quick spirt" (act1scene2). Brutus feels torn because, Caesar is his friend, but Brutus being an honorable man, wants to do what's best for the city of Rome. However, even after his talk with Cassius, Brutus still feels conflicted on what he should do.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision that Brutus made to join the conspirators in killing Caesar was his first, and most significant, mistake. If he had not of joined them to begin with, that may have hopefully saved his life. Brutus faced various repercussions after stabbing Caesar, that would affect him until the day of his death. Although Cassius was a main influence in Brutus killing Caesar, ultimately it was his decision (Dove, Roland, & Gamble). If Brutus had…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Yet another one of the more commonly deemed immoral personality traits. It was by this state of mind and his abuse of power that Marc Antony contributed the loss of morality within the political aspects of this play. Being a great admirer and friend of Caesar, Antony sought out revenge upon the conspirators after learning of the assassination. By making his eulogy more emotionally charged and getting the opportunity to speak after Brutus, Antony was able to uproot what his pier said and get the revenge he was seeking. Throughout his speech, Marc Antony described Caesar’s wounds in ways such as, "Look, in this place ran Cassius' dagger through. See what a rent the envious Casca made. Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabb’d.” (III, ii, 176-178) This inspired grief and anger within the Roman people that was then pointed directly at the conspirators. Until the end of the play, Antony is continuously seeking revenge and he does obtain the ultimate revenge when both of the conspirators, Brutus and Cassius, die. This strong desire for revenge is masked to look like justice for the assassination of a great leader, but is it really? In the end, there is no benefit. Yes, Caesar’s death has been avenged but all the great political minds that could have taken his place after his assassination have also been killed and the couple left have been even more corrupted after going through this whole ordeal. Now those…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    •Brutus argues in favor of sparing Marc Antony, claiming that killing Antony would make them appear as butchers. After Caesar is assassinated, Brutus allows Antony to speak at Caesar's funeral. Bad idea.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus is a very cautious man. "Into what dangers are you leading me, Cassius, that you would have me lookinto myself for things that are not there?"(1.2.68-70) This quote is referring to act 1 where Cassius brings Brutus into the room and starts to talk about Caesar. When Cassius suggests to kill Mark Antony alone with Caesar, Brutus says, "Our plan will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius. We cut off the head and then hack the limbs, seem to kill Caesar in anger and then vent malice on his friends, for Antony is only a branch of Caesar."(2.1.169-172) Brutus doesn't want to just kill everyone, and be know as a killer, he just wants to do what he thinks is right for the people of Rome. Brutus was cautious, even near the end of the play when he was in his tent talking to Cassius,he told Lucilius and Titinius to go guard the door, until he had finished he conference.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus: the Tragic Hero

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To begin with, Brutus' lust for power is one of the many ways that make him to be the tragic hero. It all started when the conspirators and himself discussed/planned the assassination of Caesar. During the agreement and arrangement of the assassination, is when Brutus gains his power and gets what he wants. He then gets more involved with the killing of Caesar, making him feel more powerful. "Ay, every man away. Brutus shall lead, and we will grace his heels with the most boldest and best hearts of Rome." (iii, I, 119-121). Although Brutus can single handily take over the conspirator group and over rule Cassius, as a tragic hero he is to begin to lose power. This takes place throughout the falling action in act4 when Antony makes the angry mob turn against him. It will eventually lead up to his untimely death/downfall.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus believes nothing should be done without honor, which he illustrates by killing Caesar publicly. Some would say killing for political reasons, is more honorable than killing someone for pure revenge. He even believes an oath is dishonorable: “No! Not an oath if not the face of men!” (Shakespeare 2.1.125). He believes an oath would undermine the purpose of his honorable assassination. He believes that if the conspirators have to go so low as to take an oath, one of them might want to quit or have second-thoughts. After the killing, he makes sure that the conspirators will proclaim they killed Caesar by telling them, “Let no man abide this deed but [us], the doers.” (3.1.103-104). Brutus is so sure that killing Caesar is right, that he believes the conspirators won’t be arrested by running down the streets yelling that they killed Caesar and “tyranny is dead!” (3.1.87-88). Also, when he is running away from Antony’s victorious army, he feels it is more honorable to, “leap in ourselves than tarry ‘till they push us.” (5.5.28-29). He is so dedicated to honor that he would rather kill himself than be taken by Antony.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The act of joining the conspirators in a plot to kill Julius Caesar was Brutus’ first blunder. At first Brutus was unsure about the plan and needed more time to think about it. Cassius then misled Brutus into believing that more people would support the action of killing Caesar than leaving him alive. Cassius makes Brutus believe this by sending many fake letters through his window, signed with various names, in the days leading up to the assassination. If Cassius wouldn’t have swayed Brutus into believing that Caesar needed to die the great tragedy of Julius Caesar would have never occurred. Brutus should have never listened to Caesar.Therefore, leading to Brutus’ first mistake.…

    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays