Are Science and Religion in Conflict? - Paper Essay Example
Are Science and Religion in Conflict? The debate about the compatibility of science and religion has been quite ongoing for a while. Many clergy men do not believe that both institutions are in conflict with each other. In fact people have come to believe that they both complement each other. In other words, science provides an explanation where religion falters and religion provides an explanation where science falters. This argument has been used to quell inquiries into the relationship that exists
(or seems to) between science and religion. The argument being presented in this paper is very straightforward. It transcends the borders laid out by the proponents of the compatibility of science and religion regarding how they seem to complement each other and proves that they are in conflict with each other. Science and religion have been in conflict with each other from time immemorial and this is still the case even at the present. It may even be subjectively suggested that it has become obvious to the ‘compatibility’ proponents that religion has lost the war against science and rather than surrendering, religion could still be made to coexist with science, and thus, the ‘compatibility’ argument. In subsequent paragraphs, the opposing sides of the argument on science not being in conflict with religion will be presented. As with any proper argumentative paper, a counter argument will be presented and this will also be followed by an argument that counters the counter-argument. The main opposing view will delve into the conflicting nature of these institutions by considering the wide gap between the nature of scientific laws and that of religious laws by means of logical reasoning techniques. The counter-argument on the other hand will explore the possible relationships between scientific laws and religious laws that make them complement each other, and the subsequent response to the counter-argument will still provide logical means by which the claims
(or seems to) between science and religion. The argument being presented in this paper is very straightforward. It transcends the borders laid out by the proponents of the compatibility of science and religion regarding how they seem to complement each other and proves that they are in conflict with each other. Science and religion have been in conflict with each other from time immemorial and this is still the case even at the present. It may even be subjectively suggested that it has become obvious to the ‘compatibility’ proponents that religion has lost the war against science and rather than surrendering, religion could still be made to coexist with science, and thus, the ‘compatibility’ argument. In subsequent paragraphs, the opposing sides of the argument on science not being in conflict with religion will be presented. As with any proper argumentative paper, a counter argument will be presented and this will also be followed by an argument that counters the counter-argument. The main opposing view will delve into the conflicting nature of these institutions by considering the wide gap between the nature of scientific laws and that of religious laws by means of logical reasoning techniques. The counter-argument on the other hand will explore the possible relationships between scientific laws and religious laws that make them complement each other, and the subsequent response to the counter-argument will still provide logical means by which the claims