Preview

Anti-Federalist Speech Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
399 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anti-Federalist Speech Example
We went to war with Great Britain, and for what? Did we not fight them in order to escape monarchy? They have taxed us without our consent, they have violated our homes with their troops, they have forbidden out most fundamental rights: Life, Liberty, and Property. Does this new constitution not do the same? The new constitution may contain many intriguing aspects, but beware. Will this constitution take away our rights, our freedom, our sovereignty? We must be wary of this constitution or else our 'president' will become a tyrant. "We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness..." We must be on alert about our rights, for this 'constitution' will allow our governments to take away our 'unalienable' rights. We have paid for our liberty with our blood, our lives, and our loved ones. Why must we take chances with a document that does not guarantee success? The need for a Bill of Rights is essential. Without the Bill of Rights, we are bound to face many issues: Our nation will split in two; we will have another Revolutionary War. Through out history, we have seen political leaders starving for power. And with this starvation, countries have been left with little freedom. To prevent this from happening, we must create a document, a document serves as a defense against our government, a document that will guarantee our freedom, a document that will set us apart from other countries. Our liberty is what many dream about having, but is also what kings, tyrants, and monarchs fear of. Without a Bill of Rights, we will be like servants to the government. Is this not why we broke away from Great Britain? I ask you, what is the point of changing the political system if our rights are hanging by a thread? The success in this new nation depends on whether or not the Bill of Rights exists.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The American Constitution is far from “a beacon on the hill” because it has significant flaws; features such as its rigidity means that it is extremely hard to amend when necessary and The Constitution’s ambiguity enables krytocracy to exist. Its underlying principles of democracy, equality and freedom are admirable particularly when it was created in the late seventeen hundreds and there are many strengths that remain in the constitution e.g. The Bill of Rights. However whilst historically it would be seen as a “beacon on the hill” it does not seem to remain a valid assessment of it in modern society, as much of the context is dated or inflexible.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the first draft of The Declaration of Independence, people’s rights were being ignored by the King. Thomas Jefferson once said “mankind is more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed” (Jefferson,1), this is telling us that the people are allowing the corrupt government to take over their life and put them through suffering that they do not deserve or want. “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Jefferson, 1), this one ruler mentality also known as absolute monarchy lets the ruler have full control of everything and has no limits on his wishes or power. This type of government allowed the one ruler or king to take away people’s right to be heard, seen and ultimately their happiness.…

    • 813 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Framers wrote “securing the blessings of liberty,” it was referring to the freedom to criticize the government or petition it when they disagreed with its policies, in other words it meant our government will make good decisions so that we have the good things about freedom and the future generations have freedom and right as well. Once the constitution was ratified the Bill of Rights were the ten amendments to the constitution that offered numerous limitations on the national government's ability to interfere with personal liberties, now there are 27 amendments.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States of America has become one of the most essential documents of legislation in history. The modern government of America that exists today is built upon the Constitution. Found within the document is another important piece of legislation that is called The Bill of Rights which is composed of the first ten amendments. The purpose of this bill was to protect the rights of the citizens, granting the people certain freedoms and preventing the government from becoming powerful. One of the most heated debates on civil liberties is freedom of speech.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It outlines the freedoms and rights that citizens have, for example when a citizen is on trial they have the right to a fair trial, before trials were often unfair and innocent people were found guilty. Just like the United States has changed and evolved over the past 200 years, certain rights addressed in the Bill of Rights have also changed. Some don't really even pertain to today. Amendment three for example doesn't really have any relativity today. Back then housing troops was a major issue but today it is not. The Bill of Rights was written in an era completely different than ours. Issues were different and with that there were different situations to arise. I believe that the Bill of Rights to change as the times change. 200 years ago they didn't have the issues of searching people when going through the airport, because of the fear that there might be some kind of danger. As times change I believe so should the Bill of Rights, to an extent. There are certain rights that are just as relevant now as they were 200 year ago, yet the ones that no longer pertain to us should be taken out and replaced with new ones that would serve the people better. The Patriot Act which was enacted to protect citizens from terrorism, seems like it has limited basic rights more than it has protected. Citizens passing up rights in order to feel protected. There are people out there though…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    and the replacement of the Bill of Rights with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If it wasn't for king George being a tyrant under colonist eyes we may have never obtained the first amendment .The act of spreading tyranny over the colonist solidified the colonist under one principle which was the view that Monarchies are unacceptable and that a Republic is desirable to the commonwealth of the people. King George oppressed the colonist by rendering there legislatures useless by overruling them. Founders of 1st Amendment realized the significance of rights people must have in order to maintain a Republic. what. The rights to freedom of speech, Press, religion and to assemble are all heavily relayed on to maintain a Republic because the belief was that without one of these rights a Republic may alter into another form of tyranny or crumble…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Constitution did not protect the basic human rights that were the goal of the Revolution. It was necessary that the Constitution protected the people from tyranny. The document also provided a system of government that was too closely related to that of Great Britain. The President held too much power just like the King of England. America was becoming their own nightmare. No one man should have enough power to take away an individuals God given rights, and control everything and everyone. The Constitution was on a path of creating a tyrannical monarchy in America, just like in England. The government had all the tendencies to centralize just like a monarchy, which is exactly what the convention was trying to end. The Constitution lacked the security of rights, had the makings of an overly centralized government that could lead to tyranny and it had a major resemblance of aristocracy. Without rights, people are subject to become nothing more then a piece in a monarch’s game. Under the Constitution, the president could have suppressed people’s rights, as they were not…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is very important that the Constitution be ratified. The Constitution is a compilation of many of the proposed ideas suggested in various important documents such as the Magna Carta, English Bill of Rights, and even the Declaration of Independence. I am amazed at the compromises that are being suggested to win the Anti-Federalists' approval of the Constitution. I am also angered at the promise of a bill of rights! The national government would be so good at protecting the rights of the people that it would soon gain their loyalty and support. It could not become a tyranny because of the limitations placed on it by the system of checks and balances and separation of powers, because of that I feel a Bill of Rights is not necessary.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mathew Spalding’s “We Still Hold These Truths” uncovers the steps needed to create and maintain a free, and just government run by the liberty of the people. However, the contemporary political system reeks of tyranny in its unjust representation, self-serving politicians, and in many other ways. It may remain unknown for centuries to come what it will take to maintain a government based entirely on the consent of the people. Until then, none may truly know the powers that come with a free nation, like Benjamin Franklin stated, “A republic, if you can keep…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These unalienable rights include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; which is stated in the Declaration of Independence. (“ We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”) Today, people are still trying to decipher what the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence is truly trying to say. For example, there have been recent arguments centered on the death penalty.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The English Bill of Rights precedent for other governments led the idea of unalienable rights to become a hot topic. Citizens under the French and British monarchies believed that “The promise of those rights can be denied, suppressed, or just remain unfilled, but it does not die (Hunt, 175).” Therefore, our rights still exist even if our government suppresses them. Those rights will always be there no matter how much the government tries to belittle them. The uprising of peoples’ belief in their own rights spurred the creation of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American people have been known from the start for a strong Constitution created to protect the rights of their citizens. As culture evolved, our interpretation of the document has shifted with it, but the document itself and its fundamental concepts have not. The Constitution has protected the basic rights of all citizens, and has granted us certain privileges that allow us to uphold the democracy and the government that serves the people. Some of these include the right to vote and the ability of citizens to maintain their status.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We The People Analysis

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ‘We the People’ are the driver; the government is the car. And we decide where it should go, and by what route, and how fast. Almost all the world's constitutions are documents in which governments tell the people what their privileges are. Our Constitution is a document in which ‘We the People’ tell the government what it is allowed to do. ‘We the People’ are free.” I agree with what Ronald Reagan said in his Farewell Address, we are the ones who give the Constitution power and meaning. The Constitution is for “the people” and as we grow and mature as a nation these simple words “we the people” will continue to grow along with…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalist viewpoint is valid, and should be considered seriously. Their ideas on federalism and the Constitution were similar to the Federalists, but the Anti-Federalists wanted to add more precautions to the Constitution, and were especially careful about preventing tyranny from happening within the states. The Anti-Federalists were focussed on individual rights, and wanted the states to have a high power in the government. Each state at the time was vital for the growth of the United States, as it is today. Their pressing for the Bill of Rights was extremely important then, and equally important in this modern age. This is why the Anti-Federalist view should come to light to the people of the United States.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays